*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Virology is a pseudoscience

..........From "The Way Forward by Alec Zeck"

I hope people understand the implications of what we've done.

With multiple independent labs, we've conducted the exact same experiments as are conducted by virologists — wherein they claim the results of the experiment demonstrate both the presence and pathogenicity of a virus, except we DID NOT have any human sample (meaning no possible source of a virus) and we achieved the same results, repeatedly.

Think about what that means for virology's foundational "evidence."

We conducted the exact same cell-culture isolation technique 90 times, EXCEPT we DID NOT include a human sample (which they say contains viruses).

We used one of the most robust cell lines — Human Embryonic Kidney Cells, with the exact same antibiotic and serum concentration.

Each time, we achieved the exact same cytopathic effect (CPE, or cellular breakdown). This CPE is what virologists point to as proof of viruses. And we did it multiple times, without any human sample — meaning no possible source of a "virus" — and got the exact same results.

A separate independent lab then conducted Transmission Electron Microscopy on the samples atter CPE.
In the TEM images, we found:

HIV (same size, shape)
SARS-CoV-2 (same size, shape)
Measles (same size, shape)

Again, this is without ANY human sample at all, which means no possible source of any "virus."

So, in layman's terms, what does all of this mean?

This means that the foundational evidence wherein virologists claim that a virus exists and causes illness can be achieved, repeatedly, without any human sample (meaning no possible source of a virus) present.

So what does that mean about the foundational claims of virology, of which all of the medical tyranny, much of allopathy, and the entire shot schedule was built upon?

I’ll let you think about the implications.

Interesting. So cellular debris can resemble said viruses. To take this even farther they should have a comparison challenge. Take samples from these guys and from other virologists who think they have actual viruses and try to grow more in a petri dish. I wonder if they would still get the same results or not.

shaftless wrote:Interesting. So cellular debris can resemble said viruses. To take this even farther they should have a comparison challenge. Take samples from these guys and from other virologists who think they have actual viruses and try to grow more in a petri dish. I wonder if they would still get the same results or not.

In 1954, Enders did this experiment as a control, and in the notes, it said the experiment could not rule out these results being from the experiment itself....However, the push (financially) and the Nobel Prize and Ender's being on the cover of TIME Magazine just 'blew' away all reasons to look at this paper under the microscope, because that same paper provided a gateway toward vaccine manufacturer and finally 'proved' all those particles they could never find before, could now be "found. using this flawed procedure.

What was thought to be the 'proof' was based on a chain of misinterpretations.

The first paper was published in 1954 by Enders et al.: “Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic
agents from patients with measles” (Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun; 86 (2): 277–286).

In that experiment, Enders et al. Dramatically reduced the nutrient solution and added cell-destroying
antibiotics to the cell culture before introducing the allegedly infected fluid. The subsequent dying of the
cells was then misinterpreted as presence and also isolation of the measles virus. No control
experiments were performed to exclude the possibility that it was the deprivation of nutrients as well as
the antibiotics which led to the cytopathic effects (death of cells).

Enders and his colleagues ignored their own reservations and cautions expressed in 1954, when they had
observed and noted that many cells also died after being treated normally (i.e. without being
“infected”), which they thought to have been caused by unknown viruses and other factors. All these
facts and cautions were subsequently disregarded.




Also, Stefan Lanka did this experiment, and he subsequently performed control experiments on Bioinformatics as well.

All that said, an important distinction should be made.

Three techniques that can readily be used to properly isolate (purify) a virus if they really existed.

A protocol for isolation, purification, characterization, and functional dissection of Exsomes.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33420988/
Purification of Bacteriophages Using Anion- Exchange Chromatography
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29134587/
Standardized Bacteriophage purification for personalized phage therapy
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32709990/
So-called "Giant Viruses" are Bacteriophages and can be purified and isolated.
Stock image of Bacteriophages. This is the typical image often portrayed as "viruses" but they are not.

The above material is from my own "book" called "Virus Myth."

Anyway, there are thousands, (probably tens of thousands) by now of intended way to disprove viruses.

For example. thousands of natural botanical substances are tested for "anti-viral" activity.

Most people who have no understanding of the methods, procedures, and tech will just assume anti-viral means it destroys viruses.  In reality, it simply demonstrates the natural substance or whatever is being tested on a cell culture which utilizes the standard procedure for 'growing viruses' diminishes or has an effect of some kind on the dying of cells (cytopathic effect).

So in my book, I provided an example of a common nutriceutical called Naringenin, which is derived from citrus rind fruits. A 'viral isolation' procedure on corona virus was used to demonstrate the effect of Naringenin on its anti-viral activity against the alleged virus.

Since no viruses exist and by the way, the procedure said to be used in virology textbooks is never used...Naringenins 'anti-viral' activity was in reality the anti-toxin effect against the poisons added to the cell culture, which were added to the monkey kidney cells, Amphotericin, cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with non-essential amino acids (NEAA), penicillin/streptomycin.

Remember, such toxins, listed in bold are extremely toxic to monkey kidney cells, which cause the cytopathic effect, however in the presence of Naringenin, the effect was muted.

Kaufman - Kirsch interview Virus Debate!

link to view-starts at the 5 min mark.

https://rumble.com/v516uno-vsrf-live-131-the-great-virus-debate-an-interview-with-dr.-andrew-kaufman-m.html

I watched it....wasn't blown away by the Kirsch's anti-scientific discourse.

The End of Virology with Jamie Andrews + Jacob Diaz

https://rumble.com/v512nrn-the-most-important-project-of-the-century-the-end-of-virology-with-jamie-an.html

For Steve Kirsch & anyone else claiming "SARS-COV-2" exists, quit relying on fraudulent genomic data to try & prove this.

Look at the foundational evidence presented. You will realize that not only is it pseudoscientific, but the authors admitted that they did not isolate a "virus."

For more on the "coronavirus" fraud, please see this article.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/12/24/creating-the-coronavirus/

For explanations and evidence against Steve's arguments against purification/isolation, please see these articles:

1. https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/11/has-the-virus-been-isolated-no/
2. https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/30/is-purification-of-a-virus-necessary-yes/
3. https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/26/the-virus-of-sin/

RECAPPING THE VIRUS/ NO VIRUS DEBATE- JUNE 19TH, 2024

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aEZaGZEOctnj/

For the "meat" of this, start at the 37 minute mark.....What causes the cytopathic effect (CPE) or dying of cells 'proving viruses' has nothing to do with viruses....instead it is the additives in the experiment that cause this effect.

There is no isolated virus; without an isolated and purified virus, the test, be it PCR, antigen, or antibody, is impossible to develop and validate. Therefore, any claim that the test is linked to the virus is simply a false claim, and this is a fact from science/chemistry.

Test development and validation are part of science/chemistry, not the subject of medicine or biology. Hence, they (medical/biological area experts) made the colossal mistake of claiming and promoting a test for the virus and exposed themselves as nonscience experts (aka fake scientists).

Moreover, Dr. Cowan is correct in saying that no culturing can show the existence of the virus based on CPE or so-called sequencing (technically not sequencing but joining of arbitrary and imaginary (chemical) pieces) because such studies or claims would require isolated and purified virus samples. This is a scientifically valid statement.

Was reading about a 25% surge in hospitalizations happening now in the uk and america with respiratory symptoms. They are blaming a new covid variant. Haven't heard of anything here in canuckland. If this is true wondering what causes these "unseasonal" symptoms to appear out of nowhere. Maybe its weather related with the summer heat waves and humidity trapping air pollution closer to us.

What we see are exosomes which are released by our cells and are beneficial to protecting our body.
There’s no such thing as “C0NV!D.”


[/url]