*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Awesome info, thank you CS. Yes, we are all learning here, including me. Helping to clarify and elaborate on my longtime belief in/
understandings of terrain theory.

And hopefully opening some minds on Twitter!

SEVEN STEPS THAT PROVE VIRUSES DON'T EXIST - DR. STEFAN LANKA WITH DR. THOMAS COWAN

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gomwZTcfGERg/

According to fact checkers this document was "misrepresented". At the time the CDC wrote it there wasn't enuff covid viral stock to do a proper test. So they used transcribed RNA or a synthetic version of the viral genetic material. But now there are plenty of viral stocks in laboratories world wide. Sounds good to me lol.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cdc-idUSKBN27633R

shaftless wrote:According to fact checkers this document was "misrepresented". At the time the CDC wrote it there wasn't enuff covid viral stock to do a proper test. So they used transcribed RNA or a synthetic version of the viral genetic material. But now there are plenty of viral stocks in laboratories world wide. Sounds good to me lol.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cdc-idUSKBN27633R

Reuters fact check. Yeah that's a reliable source.

shaftless wrote:According to fact checkers this document was "misrepresented". At the time the CDC wrote it there wasn't enuff covid viral stock to do a proper test. So they used transcribed RNA or a synthetic version of the viral genetic material. But now there are plenty of viral stocks in laboratories world wide. Sounds good to me lol.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cdc-idUSKBN27633R

Let's fact check the pharmaceutical bribed 'fact checker' Reuters. I heard a devoted acquaintance explain
to me that he trusts mainstream media because "they are not allowed to lie." Well, that used to be true.

On January 2,2013 Obama signed and enacted into “law” HR 4310. It is also known as the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012. It was part of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).



The RNA of SARS-CoV-2 actually comes from a healthy human tissue

In the second part of the control experiments, the laboratory confirmed that what virologists call "viral genetic material" actually comes from healthy human tissue.

Statements from the laboratory 🧫

Already with 12 cycles (PCR) we get 20% of the genome of SARS-COV-2

With 30 cycles (PCR) we get 98% of the genome of SARS-COV-2

With 45 cycles you would get all the sequences, that would be dirty and only virologists do that


Video in English with German subtitle:

https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/873

Okay, so let's try to figure out how viable reverse transcribing would be.

PCR amplification with conditions commonly used for virology seem to produce many errors.

You find the primer here:

https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-020-2008-3/MediaObjects/41586_2020_2008_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Checking the forward primers with copy / paste + ctrl & find. The primers are OK for Mn908947.1, but not OK for AP019846.1

The letters in the forward primer are the same as in the letters ref.seq sars-cov-2. Anti-sense strand DNA is reverse transcribed from RNA, and a forward primer is bound to it.

The primers do not match exactly in the second genome. They were mapped under the acceptance of an error rate. But this shows that primers are not cleanly binder and thus not "viral" sequences are amplified!

Mismatch should be 15% maximum but with 35 cycles every magical scenario is possible.

So, that first graph for the first contig might prove that the wuhan-hu-1 sequences were obtained with dirty PCR and dirty primers.  

I found that someone already addressed the Reuters "fact check" so in addition what I provided above, here's what was written.

"The so-called “fact-check” blows off and trivializes admissions (re-published by the CDC in JULY 2020) that “no quantified virus isolates” were available and that their “C0NV!D” assays (the useless, fraudulent PCR tests that are utterly incapable of confirming any disease or “virus”) have been assessed for accuracy using “characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA”, aka synthetic RNA, not RNA from any actual “SARS-COV-2”.

The so-called “fact-check” boils down to reassurances from Dr. Thushan de Silva that this is perfectly normal, “no reason to question the existence of SARS-CoV-2” and that “there are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world” – which is an outright lie from Dr. de Silva and one that I hope he is held responsible for.

Reuters’ so-called “fact-check” cites zero proof or even compelling evidence that “the virus” actually does exist, because there is none.

Meanwhile, the collection of “SARS-COV-2” isolation FOI responses (https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/) includes a formal “no records” response from the CDC dated NOVEMBER 2, 2020, showing that the CDC still had no record of anyone on the planet ever isolating “the virus”.

Click to access USA-CDC-Virus-Isolation-Response-Scrubbed.pdf

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/USA-CDC-Virus-Isolation-Response-Scrubbed.pdf

This so-called “fact-check” from Reuters contributes only condescending authoritative posturing and outright lies. The only thing they correctly point out is that the CDC document alone doesn’t “prove” that “the virus” doesn’t exist. However the document certainly contributes powerfully to the body of evidence (which of course includes all the so-called “isolation” studies) that the whole “SARS-COV-2” story is a hoax. That “the virus” doesn’t exist is undeniable at this point."

ADDRESSING DR MCCULLOUGH, DR MALONE AND DR COLE'S SARS-COV-2 CLAIMS: WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Mee0oHfBTGz/

Maybe it's because of the different physiology between people and animals. Dogs and cats get heartworms fairly easily from being bit by an infected mosquito. We don't. Those parasitic worms can grow up to a foot long and mosquitoes are the main culprit for transmission by sucking up larvae from an infected wolf or fox or other wild animal. Maybe for the covid virus we're the more susceptible ones.

shaftless wrote:Maybe it's because of the different physiology between people and animals. Dogs and cats get heartworms fairly easily from being bit by an infected mosquito. We don't. Those parasitic worms can grow up to a foot long and mosquitoes are the main culprit for transmission by sucking up larvae from an infected wolf or fox or other wild animal. Maybe for the covid virus we're the more susceptible ones.

What C0NV!D virus?

But speaking of parasites, I think there's no argument that parasites exist. Here's a few, that are very infectious. Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum.

FOIs 2020, 2021, 2022 reveal that health/science institutions around the world (178 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Wouldn't damage from insects be a little more obvious...like holes in the leaves from being physically attacked? And if the plants are being attacked down in the roots then you should find these nasty little critters in the soil next to the root system as well like you find those white cutworms munching away. The general change in appearance of the tobacco leaves in colour and texture suggests something more subtle is going on.

She also says that the way they tested for a virus on tobacco leaves was that they ruffed up the leaves a little before they spread the porcelain-filtered sap on it doesn't happen that way in nature. But it does. Bugs pick up the virus from other plants and deposit it on new leaves at the same time they are trampling around and eating or laying eggs. Bugs naturally ruff up leaves. Also workers working in the fields brush against the leaves and any tools that come in contact with leaves can spread the virus from one plant to another just by touch.

She mentioned that it's probably a nutrition problem. But wouldn't that be seen early on when the tobacco plant was growing...and not so much in a previously healthy and robust fully-grown plant? And that would be the easiest to cure simply by changing the biological composition of the fertilizer.

And lastly, for a professional doctor she grins a heck of a lot... lol

shaftless wrote:She also says that the way they tested for a virus on tobacco leaves was that they ruffed up the leaves a little before they spread the porcelain-filtered sap on it doesn't happen that way in nature. But it does. Bugs pick up the virus from other plants and deposit it on new leaves at the same time they are trampling around and eating or laying eggs. Bugs naturally ruff up leaves. Also workers working in the fields brush against the leaves and any tools that come in contact with leaves can spread the virus from one plant to another just by touch.

She mentioned that it's probably a nutrition problem. But wouldn't that be seen early on when the tobacco plant was growing...and not so much in a previously healthy and robust fully-grown plant? And that would be the easiest to cure simply by changing the biological composition of the fertilizer.

And lastly, for a professional doctor she grins a heck of a lot... lol

Gr8 Devil's advocate positions here.

I've got another angle on this TMV or Tobacco Mosaic Virus.

First of, all totally agree on the grin, Sam Bailey does it like breathing.

Cyanide action in plants — from toxic to regulatory

I think this is about natural plant defense. Recent biochemical and genetic studies on hydrogen cyanide (HCN) metabolism and function in plants were reviewed. The potential sources of endogenous cyanide and the pathways of its detoxification are outlined and the possible signaling routes by which cyanide exerts its physiological effects are discussed. Cyanide is produced in plant tissues as the result of hydrolysis of cyanogenic compounds and is also released as a co-product of ethylene biosynthesis. Most cyanide produced in plants is detoxified primarily by the key enzyme β-cyanoalanine synthase. The remaining HCN at non-toxic concentration may play a role of signaling molecule involved in the control of some metabolic processes in plants.

In other words, most of us here are somewhat familiar with the notion that tobacco products contain some cyanide.

I'm conjecturing here that the role of the so-called 'virus' is more of an association with hydrogen cyanide.

Other references to look at:

Liang W.-S. 2003. Drought stress increases both cyanogenesis and â-cyanoalanine synthase activity in tobacco. Plant Sci. 165:1109–1115.

Liang W.-S., Li D.-B. 2001. The two β-cyanoalanine synthase isozymes of tobacco showed different antioxidative abilities. Plant Sci. 161: 1171–1177.

Siefert F., Kwiatkowski J., Sarkar S., Grossmann K. 1995. Changes in endogenous cyanide and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid levels during the hypersensitive response of tobacco mosaic virus-infected tobacco leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 17: 109–113.

VIROLOGY IS WAY PAST ITS 'CELL' BY DATE

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mUWDjoL0i9xI/

DR. ARDIS SNAKE VENOM THEORY DISCUSSION WITH MIKE ADAMS

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FcRCHcivfCh5/

Part 2/3 - Dr. Bryan Ardis reveals BOMBSHELL origins of C0NV!D mRNA vaccines and treatments

https://www.brighteon.com/60556b94-86af-4eae-aa59-441b02b71c33

Is it just me or is this guy incredibly confusing lol. He says that snake venom is covid...but points out numerous articles that say snake venom can cure covid. Huh? Or maybe certain molecules in snake venom can cure covid. Something like homeopathy perhaps...like cures like. Well that would be an easy experiment to do in the lab. Treat a snake bite victim...preferably an animal first....with these venom-derived molecules like phospholipases A2 mentioned at the 7:50 mark. Who knows, maybe it might work. But so far snake anti-venom is made up of antibodies taken from blood plasma.

To me it's wrong to assume that just becuz snake venom can be a cure for covid that somehow covid and venom share a likeness. Or just becuz covid and venom share a lot of the same symptoms in people that somehow they are related. Eating too much salt can give you high blood pressure. So can diabetes...or a lack of exercise and being over-weight...or even pregnancy. Snake venom affects your breathing ability...so does emphysema from smoking too much.

I dunno. This guy is grabbing at straws too much for me.

shaftless wrote:Is it just me or is this guy incredibly confusing lol. He says that snake venom is covid...but points out numerous articles that say snake venom can cure covid. Huh? Or maybe certain molecules in snake venom can cure covid. Something like homeopathy perhaps...like cures like. Well that would be an easy experiment to do in the lab. Treat a snake bite victim...preferably an animal first....with these venom-derived molecules like phospholipases A2 mentioned at the 7:50 mark. Who knows, maybe it might work. But so far snake anti-venom is made up of antibodies taken from blood plasma.

To me it's wrong to assume that just becuz snake venom can be a cure for covid that somehow covid and venom share a likeness. Or just becuz covid and venom share a lot of the same symptoms in people that somehow they are related. Eating too much salt can give you high blood pressure. So can diabetes...or a lack of exercise and being over-weight...or even pregnancy. Snake venom affects your breathing ability...so does emphysema from smoking too much.

I dunno. This guy is grabbing at straws too much for me.

More interviews coming up. Remember, Ardis has looked at this carefully for 4-months. Be sure to watch all
of the interviews.

Hold your horses.....oh speaking of horses, that's partly how they produce anti-venom.

It's not venom curing C0NV!D, it's anti-venom curing the poison (snake-venom like peptides they are blaming on a non-existent virus.

Remdesivir = Freeze dried snake venom.

Before expanding on this, here are the antidotes for snake venom-like peptides or synthetic mRNA they very well maybe nothing more than forms of king cobra venom.

Just a partial list

Chlorine Dioxide
Ecklonia Cava - 10 to 15 X stronger than NAC (N-Acetyl-Cysteine)
NAC (N-Acetyl-Cysteine
Vitamin C

The other interviews on this subject go into much further detail.

Another important note:

Bryan Ardis has stated that the vector of contamination could be a variety of sources. Water is only one
possibility. Most of us who drink tap water have been poisoned for decades with fluoride, yet there are
also DARPA documents suggesting aeroslized or even food.

The so-called "spike-protein" would only make sense in the form of trypsin enzymes. As I've previously mentioned,
researchers who attempt to 'prove' viruses resort to using trypsin enzymes to create a spike protein effect. It's simply not going to appear that way without it.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29604354/

To clarify any "benefits" some venom-like properties in some types of drugs, it's not really a health benefit, but that's only my opinion--I'm biased against drugs. Lisinopril for example is a "blood pressure" lowering drug, but does it really help people?  If getting dizzy is a benefit, then I would agree.

monoclonal antibodies = anti-venom against snake venom

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9723843/

I think Ardis nails it 100%.

DR ARDIS WITH MIKE ADAMS - VENOM IN VACCINE - PART 3

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1d3sh6zUWaeb/

I wonder why he originally bad-mouthed monoclonal antibodies

shaftless wrote:I wonder why he originally bad-mouthed monoclonal antibodies

Ardis seemed to think that some of the research with the development of monoclonal antibodies involved the use of cancer cells. Because of that, he wasn't certain about the longterm safety effects.

CausticSymmetry wrote:DR ARDIS WITH MIKE ADAMS - VENOM IN VACCINE - PART 3

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1d3sh6zUWaeb/

I haven't commented on this because I haven't really studied it.  I am hearing impaired and much
prefer videos to be subtitled or closed captioned.  A transcript, even better. This is where the alt media
sites fall down, they don't caption hardly anything.

I was just reading the Covid Blog, run by Brian at Covid Legal.  
He said of the snake venom theory:

I have no comment on the whole "snake venom" story that's been circulating since last week. Several people have written in about it. But I prefer reading versus watching a video with a lot of dramatic music. One subscriber is transcribing the video so I can read it.

Hope he posts the transcription when ready.  In the meantime, if you would care to summarize Ardis' findings, CS, that would be awesome

The snake venom discussion has a lot of layers to it. The detractors I think have only performed a superficial dive and have not addressed all of the what this entails.

There is still some proving out to do whether this is real or just an interesting hypothesis.
That said, there is a lot of inference related to patents.

https://www.changeexchangehealth.com/post/dr-ardis-snake-venom-covid-bombshell

Bing Liu was murdered who apparently made a connection between the krait venom.

https://www.ibtimes.sg/bing-liu-murder-fatal-shooting-chinese-coronavirus-researcher-us-fuels-wild-theories-44529

There is mounting evidence that snake venom might be inside of the mRNA Quackines and it is speculated the
"There isn't an aspect of C0NV!D, its symptoms as a disease or an infection, none of the symptoms or side effects of 'the antiviral' Remdesivir, none of the side effects or adverse advents, serious or minor, of the mRNA vaccines that cannot be linked to snake venom poisoning. All of it is related."

[Forwarded from The Truth Seeker]

"Dr Joseph Yi, AKA "StreetMD" asked Drs Bailey, Cowan and Kaufman to respond to Drs Malone, McCullough and Cole's claims that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and shown to exist. Boom!"

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/SARS-CoV-2-Bailey-Cowan-Kaufman-respond-to-Cole--McCullough-and-Malone:3

Someone should tell that streetmd guy to organized a meeting of the minds from both sides at the same time. Get these same pro and anti virus experts to come on his show and go head to head in a live feed. And not just using only words for denial or justification but also supplying links to experiments and photos etc. But yeah, it would be great to see each side in a tag team effort defend itself in.... the bout of the century!!!