*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

shaftless wrote:I just thot that she was a little out of form talking about these mind-control graphene particles. I've never heard her husband carry on about them. He just sticks to the fallacies of virology. But maybe that gets boring after a while and you have to spice things up a little. Looking back at the video, it is a bit dated made back in early 2022 when a lot of those theories were flying around.

I think we don't have to worry about vaccines anymore. People are staying away from them in droves. They just can't be bothered and think any viral infection has minimal consequences these days.

She had a lot of her fan base ask about shedding, and yes this was more of a topic from last year and I've been asked about this occasionally.

It's an interesting topic and I've only heard a few theories tossed around on it.

Perhaps at some time much more will be revealed.

Here's a post from a doctor who believes in the fake thing (C0NV!D), however does drop some interesting
points

https://x.com/DrSHankMD/status/1702322350711345248?s=20

I noticed one of the comments is someone who thinks that just because they got really sick before the \/accine came out
that C0NV!D was the cause. It's very much like being beamed with toxic radiation and then blaming a made-up virus as the cause.

CausticSymmetry wrote:Longshanks - I can generalize on the treatment, however medical history is often a critical piece. That said, you did drop one interesting tidbit on the birth control, which is probably either a Premarin-based and or conjugated-estrogen and progestin combo.

Natural treatments for cysts (on the ovaries), so yes research is not clear on the cause, but probably  related to the suppression of ovulation, the stimulation of ovarian follicles (FSH), or Luteinizing hormone (LH), or a sensitivity to  gonadotrophins.

So frequent dosing of very high dose serrapeptase. This embolizes (digests them)

https://www.iherb.com/pr/arthur-andrew-medical-serretia-pure-serrapeptase-250-000-spu-90-capsules-125-000-spu-per-capsule/40061?=hil335

That said there are additional things can that be done to act as a way to prevent future ones, because birth-control absolutely can increase the risk.  Estrogen preparations inhibit thyroid, so would normally suggest certain types of iodine, but not necessarily a good idea just coming off of BC, and then there's progesterone (natural), not progestin, because it can cause cysts-The natural form shrinks them, the synthetic form creates them.

Iodine shrinks cysts, but note the above info.

Really appreciate all this CS, ironically I just had my wife start taking iodine as she had come down with a cold & was complaining of feeling fatigued. I’ll have her keep up with it.

Secrets of Virology – “Control” Experiments

https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/corruption-and-medicine/secrets-of-virology-control-experiments

I know a good way for her to show the world the lack of proper controls. She should go to a university lab and pretend to show interest in their viral experiments cuz she's making a scientific documentary for her "students". They would probably agree to help out since it's an interesting learning experience. Kinda like some scientific TV series like NOVA or Planet Earth. Then after filming their experiments and talking to the scientists and technicians she can then take off her Groucho Marxs eye glasses and mustached-nose disguise and say GOTCHA!

[

Are prions just as elusive as viruses? Zombie deers are showing up in the wild more and more these days and prions are getting all the blame. What is making these deer sick? You don't expect them to be coming in contact with man-made toxins in these far-removed forested areas like cattle and sheep would in farm settings.

shaftless wrote:Are prions just as elusive as viruses? Zombie deers are showing up in the wild more and more these days and prions are getting all the blame. What is making these deer sick? You don't expect them to be coming in contact with man-made toxins in these far-removed forested areas like cattle and sheep would in farm settings.

The playbook for prions is similar to viruses. I'm not really stating that "they" the researchers or scientists are purposefully scripting these diseases, but instead, much like science and $cience, understanding how things really work is a political process, so because of funding and grants, it slows the wheels of truth.

Quoting Stefan Lanka on viruses: It is the virologists that are deceiving themselves.

This likely applies to prion diseases.

These are protein accumulation (mis-folded protein) is the concept.

I have a very simple explanation. Toxins, which is exactly the same explanation for disease
associations with viruses.

So in 2004, a study by Mark Purdey reveals health hazards associated with some of the other toxic metals that have been found in unusually high concentrations, especially silver (Ag), barium (Ba) and strontium (Sr).

The study is reported in his article entitled Elevated silver, barium and strontium in antlers, vegetation and soil sourced from CWD cluster areas: do Ag/Ba/Sr piezoelectric crystals represent the transmissible pathogenic agent in TSEs?

CWD is chronic wasting disease, which is regarded as a TSE that is only experienced by certain types of deer.  BSE referred to the claim that a protein called a ‘prion’ is regarded as the cause of all TSEs, but demonstrated that this is not the case. In the abstract of his article, Mark Purdey indicates clearly that ‘atmospheric spraying’ was not theoretical in 2004, “The elevation of Ag, Ba and Sr were thought to originate from both natural geochemical and artificial pollutant sources.

BSE is not the only form of Spongiform Encephalopathy; there are other types that affect other animals, and these are referred to under the general heading of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy, or TSE, the causes of which are explained by the OIE information sheet about BSE that states, “BSE, like other TSEs, is characterized by the presence of
an abnormal infectious protein called a prion in nervous tissue.”

The information sheet also states that, “The subsequent spongy degeneration of the brain results in severe and fatal neurological signs and symptoms.”

Although referred to as ‘transmissible’, one form of TSE only affects sheep and goats; this disease is more commonly known as ‘scrapie’, which is also an apt description of the behavior of animals with this condition, as they often scrape their fleeces against stationary objects. However, scrapie is also described as a fatal degenerative disease that involves more than fleece scraping.

The characteristic of the ‘infectious protein’ that is claimed by the OIE to be ‘abnormal’ and the cause of TSEs is that it is ‘misfolded’. It is also claimed that the misfolding of a protein induces other proteins to become ‘misfolded’ and it is this process that is claimed to activate the ‘disease’. However, despite these claims, the establishment information about TSEs shows that the actual mechanism of action, by which the proteins become misfolded.

It is not only animals that are claimed to be affected by diseases claimed to be caused by misfolded proteins known as prions. A well known example is CJD (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), which is claimed to be the human version of BSE and is described as an incurable fatal neurodegenerative condition. One form of CJD, referred to as vCJD (variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), is claimed to be acquired from animals, which has led to the classification of BSE as a zoonotic disease.

Interestingly there are a number of human neurodegenerative diseases that are also claimed to be associated with misfolded proteins; these diseases include Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis).

There are explanations on how this really develops, but that's for another day.

Although BSE is claimed to be caused by an ‘infectious agent’, the source of this ‘pathogen’ is unknown; as the OIE information sheet indicates, “Scientists believe that the spread of this disease in cattle is caused by feeding rendered material from infected cattle or sheep back to other cattle.”

The statement that ‘scientists believe’ demonstrates that this idea has not been conclusively proven; although the OIE claims that, “…dairy herds are fed concentrate rations that contain meat and-bone meal…”

Dr Stefan Lanka:

“But what do virologists do? You only have to read any of their publications. In particular, you have to go to the Materials and Methods section to see that virologists are wrong on seven fundamental points, as well as acting unscientifically by not carrying out control tests; and on top of that, they are self-refuting.

“Point 1. Virologists inadvertently kill cells in the test tube. They remove the tissue sample from the feeding solution and apply cytotoxic antibiotics. In other words, they starve and poison the cells to death. And once the sample has been "prepared" in this way, they apply tissue that is supposedly infected with the virus, but the truth is that the original tissue will die and decompose even if sterile material is applied. Well, since 1954 it has been assumed that cell death is due to the presence of the virus. And it is understood that the virus is present in the test tube because the tissue has been taken from an infected patient. Then, from that cell and tissue mass, genetic fragments are obtained and conceptually sorted to obtain "a viral genome". However, the relevant control tests to see if the healthy tissue dies and decomposes without adding anything are never carried out.
Well, from this dead organic material, vaccines are made; if the whole material is used, they are called "live attenuated vaccines" or if only certain proteins are used, "inactivated or killed vaccines”.

“Point 2. Virologists assume that the virus is in the millions of tiny fragments of genetic material in that mixture of dead cells, so they pick out a few and sort or align them to build - using computer programmes! a complete viral genome that they have not actually
found.

“In fact, neither in cell cultures like these, nor in saliva, nor in blood has a complete viral genome ever been found. They construct it artificially. So it is the first team of virologists that constructs a viral genome that determines what it looks like, and all the others repeat the same alienation process so they get a result that is 99.99% identical to the reference genome, the one that was supposed to have been "isolated" the first time. In short, they find what they want to find! That they never find a complete viral genome and have to construct it that way is a clear indication that, quite simply, there is no such viral genome, there is no virus.

“Point 3. The millions of fragments of genetic material that the tissues and cells under study release at death contain a great deal of material from microbes, many of which are not even known. The organism constantly generates new RNA independently of DNA, which was not thought possible. However, virologists who follow in the footsteps of the group that first "sequenced" a virus simply replicate the procedure and arrive at the same result. That is, they take as a reference, as a template, the original sequence - when it is nothing more than a theoretical and mathematical construct -, find the same pieces and reach the same conclusion. Nobody performs the following control test: from the same database of genetic material, instead of being guided by the reference template, they should try to construct other supposed viral genomes with the same information; for example, genomes of other RNA viruses such as HIV, HIV-like viruses, HIV-like viruses and HIV-like viruses. RNA viruses such as HIV, measles or Ebola. But, of course, they don't do that. It should be added that the idea that the death of cells in a test tube is caused by infected material being added dates back to 1954 and was the brainchild of Nobel laureate John Franklin Enders.

“Point 4. Electron microscope photos taken by Microtomy are supposed to be of viral particles but what they actually show are typical components of decaying cells and tissues. The particles in the photos presented to us as viruses have never been biochemically characterised, nor isolated. Then they also disprove themselves. They show pictures of particles but do not work exclusively with them because they do not isolate (separate) them from the rest.

“Point 5. In the Petri dish, the virologists shake and suck up the contents of the decaying cells and tissues with fine needles and inject them back into the Petri dish. The content of this liquid is a mixture of proteins, fats, torn tissue and cell fragments and chemicals. Well, the absorption of the liquid with the needle and its re-injection causes tiny bubbles to which a dye is applied when microscopic images are taken, and these pictures are then published as if what appears in them were viral particles. However, they are not biochemically characterised to show that they actually contain a viral genome.

“Point 6. None of the microscopic photographs claiming to show a virus have been taken from samples of blood, saliva or other body fluids of any person, animal or plant. They work with artificial cellular systems that only exist in Petri dishes and laboratory test tubes and have nothing to do with what goes on inside organisms. If they want to prove what they say is true, let them isolate and photograph viruses in blood or saliva samples! It is striking that today we have to wear masks because it is said that the virus spreads like an aerosol and it turns out that no virus has ever been seen or photographed in saliva.

“Point 7. Infection experiments are carried out on animals in order to cause symptoms similar to those ascribed to coronavirus. The idea is to demonstrate that the virus spreads and causes a range of symptoms. This is done by injecting fluid into their brains or by inserting a tube into their lungs. Well, what that causes is aspiration pneumonia, but not because the fluid they are injected with has coronavirus in it: any sterile fluid would cause inflammation of the lungs (pneumonia)! Reading such studies, one realises that the
symptoms described are caused by the cruelty of the experiment itself and not by the pathogen they are supposedly inoculated with, be it "X" or "Y", HIV or SARS-CoV-2.

“Hence, here too, no control experiments are carried out.
Seven rebuttals and seven blatantly unscientific procedures. In the infection protection laws of many countries, scientific rigour is demanded of all those involved, and this is being seriously flouted. There is no science here, but anti-science. The refutation of the official version is on the table and this alone destroys any legal justification for the measures being taken.”

~ by Dr Stefan Lanka

Granted there is a lot of assumption going on. But surely...SURELY...didn't they do some kind of control sample testing at some point in the distant past to see if these unusual genetic sequences showed up in normal, uninfected samples? It's like building on a complex mathematical equation that took years to construct...we don't have to keep going back to the beginning and start all over again.

Then again, if there was an unintentional technical flaw to blame for not detecting these same genetic sequences in normal (healthy) samples then that is a different story. But you'd think the error would be found out by now.

An example of this would be those rapid covid tests you can do at home. These tests are based on the presence of antibodies from nose swab samples. If symptomatic people are testing positive then non-symptomatic (uninfected) people should also be testing positive as well. But this isn't the case. A particular antibody normally show up if there is a particular antigen present. Thus showing that this is a "unique" situation.

Then again (and there's always a "then again") one can blame a multitude of possibilities for a positive test (or a particular genetic sequence) other than the expected cause. But that only dilutes the logic behind what seems to be a worldly-accepted field of science.

So, in other words...just go with the flow until aliens prove us wrong LOL

Then again (lol)...it was just recently discovered about two decades ago that a big part of heart disease was caused by inflammation of our blood vessels. This was heresy in the medical field back then. But later gained traction and is now widely accepted. Maybe something like that will happen to reshape the current view of virology perhaps. But for now, all there is, is just a lot of finger pointing and conjecture. We need something dramatic to set the virology field on its ear.

shaftless wrote:Then again (lol)...it was just recently discovered about two decades ago that a big part of heart disease was caused by inflammation of our blood vessels. This was heresy in the medical field back then. But later gained traction and is now widely accepted. Maybe something like that will happen to reshape the current view of virology perhaps. But for now, all there is, is just a lot of finger pointing and conjecture. We need something dramatic to set the virology field on its ear.

With great thanks to our favorite master of the grin (broad smile with teeth) - Sam Bailey has already done the explaining on the rapid antigen tests. Sure I've covered this in previous pages nevertheless, these are excellent devil's advocate questions.

https://wethepundit.com/rapid-antigen-tests-making-viruses-real-again-dr-sam-bailey-3/

If we get into heart disease, the reason 'experts' do not agree on anything is that most of them have little idea how science is done. In other words, not statistically powered, not properly controlled, no independent variable on the back of epidemiology in most cases, which cannot inform on cause and effect.

Over a decade ago I wrote this piece on heart disease that rests on an archive site (it will take about 15 seconds to load).

http://web.archive.org/web/20120422155952/http://healthyfixx.com/42/clogged-arteries-do-not-cause-heart-attacks

Some of the data here is strong, but for political reasons it's not economically sustainable and very few people even know anything about this.

Then there's the number of missing teeth...this is well cited in the literature....probably the most predictive of early death from cardiovascular disease.

So back to the Virus scam. There no zero proper controls performed on the genetic sequencing, and yes Stefan Lanka performed one of his own--the result? "They have nothing!"

In order for genetic sequencing to be valid in the first place, there at least has to be a real presence of a virus...well there's none of that either.

There's a word for this. Fraud.

Man she is picky about definitions! Like if it doesn't match word for word with a particular sentence in a book then it has no meaning whatsoever. Cut them some slack, Sam! lol

And just becuz they didn't provide her with any information that she was looking for doesn't mean that there wasn't any. Maybe they just couldn't be bothered with her. She is good at pouncing on the differences of opinion of what constitutes proper standardized PCR testing...and asking how can we trust all this. But also, this is a relatively new field of testing and it is still evolving.

I was wrong about the rapid test detecting antibodies when in fact it detects a protein like she said. There are antibody tests for covid too. But still...why do so many sick people have that particular protein and many non-sick ones don't? Also some people are asymptomatic meaning they don't feel sick but are carriers of the virus. So that would explain a positive result even if they feel fine. Or they are in the beginning stages and don't feel bad yet until the virus starts multiplying more.

I've had covid a few times and I've tested positive each time while having symptoms. And when I was back to normal I tested myself on more than one occasion (out of curiosity) and tested negative each time. Isn't it logical to assume that that particular protein coincided with each time I got sick? And where did that protein go when I was feeling better? Every time I tested myself when I was feeling normal that protein was nowhere to be found.

Surely this is inescapable logic, right? And even more mysterious is...HOW DID THAT PROTEIN GET UP MY NOSE???? lol

shaftless wrote:Man she is picky about definitions! Like if it doesn't match word for word with a particular sentence in a book then it has no meaning whatsoever. Cut them some slack, Sam! lol

And just becuz they didn't provide her with any information that she was looking for doesn't mean that there wasn't any. Maybe they just couldn't be bothered with her. She is good at pouncing on the differences of opinion of what constitutes proper standardized PCR testing...and asking how can we trust all this. But also, this is a relatively new field of testing and it is still evolving.

I was wrong about the rapid test detecting antibodies when in fact it detects a protein like she said. There are antibody tests for covid too. But still...why do so many sick people have that particular protein and many non-sick ones don't? Also some people are asymptomatic meaning they don't feel sick but are carriers of the virus. So that would explain a positive result even if they feel fine. Or they are in the beginning stages and don't feel bad yet until the virus starts multiplying more.

I've had covid a few times and I've tested positive each time while having symptoms. And when I was back to normal I tested myself on more than one occasion (out of curiosity) and tested negative each time. Isn't it logical to assume that that particular protein coincided with each time I got sick? And where did that protein go when I was feeling better? Every time I tested myself when I was feeling normal that protein was nowhere to be found.

Surely this is inescapable logic, right? And even more mysterious is...HOW DID THAT PROTEIN GET UP MY NOSE???? lol

So let's have the inventor of PCR clarify something...and it's not new...it's just been abused as a diagnostic, which it is not.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gabkfjJA6tjY/

When we are symptomatic, toxins that have accumulated are being expelled (expressed as symptoms), so that debris,  which could be exosomes (not infectious agents), so yes testing positive for some of these metabolic waste products is logical in that sense.

Not much different than having off gassing from a heaping dumpster of waste in contrast to an empty dumpster.

So back to the "grin master" she is particular about definitions because in real science, these are being changed at alarming rates via "Wackypedia" (mainstream astroturf), for those who appeal to authority.

Any G00gle search, which includes YouTube is 'fact' checked by pretend 3rd parties who in a court of law had to admit they are opinions and not real facts.

CON-V!D is no different than influenza, which is nothing more than detoxification.

50 + studies in the last 120 years, zero proof of contagion, nothing of any viral sort have been ever been found in animal or human tissue ever.

Only indirect tests, which are proxy markers for things never even verified to exist simply prove nothing.

Worse of all, terrain theory is a real science that is not even taught and this is a huge missing piece.

Most $cience is based on dead and/or sterilized cells under a microscope. However, the most accurate way to
obtain truth is by way of live blood, through a somatoscope. This reveals what occurs in real time, without artifacts.
The difference between dead and live cells will be observed in the video below.

PLEOMORPHISM EXPLAINED

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wbscnORQDlIv/

You'd think that detoxification should be a relatively benign process. We're getting rid of stuff the body doesn't need. Like taking a poop or pee. It's a normal daily function that is necessary and keeps us healthy. So when does detox turn rogue and overwhelms the body? And why does it pick mostly on our respiratory system?

And you'd think that such high levels of excreted toxins that can cause inflammation, fever, muscle aches, weakness and respiratory problems should be easy to detect in blood samples since it is having such a profound affect on the entire body. These toxins are byproducts of what we normally ingest so they wouldn't be terribly foreign and hard to recognize under the microscope.

Even if these toxins were unnatural like the chemicals in food processing or house-hold cleaners or from work-place residues etc, it still should stand out like a sore thumb as the culprit in blood samples.

shaftless wrote:You'd think that detoxification should be a relatively benign process. We're getting rid of stuff the body doesn't need. Like taking a poop or pee. It's a normal daily function that is necessary and keeps us healthy. So when does detox turn rogue and overwhelms the body? And why does it pick mostly on our respiratory system?

And you'd think that such high levels of excreted toxins that can cause inflammation, fever, muscle aches, weakness and respiratory problems should be easy to detect in blood samples since it is having such a profound affect on the entire body. These toxins are byproducts of what we normally ingest so they wouldn't be terribly foreign and hard to recognize under the microscope.

Even if these toxins were unnatural like the chemicals in food processing or house-hold cleaners or from work-place residues etc, it still should stand out like a sore thumb as the culprit in blood samples.

Depending on how one's diet, lifestyle, weather, sleep, etc, will effect how and when our bodies detox.

So, I'll use myself as example here because this was at least in my case, how the self-realization came about on the basic question, do viruses even exist?

An a practitioner of orthomolecular medicine (which simply means the right about of a natural substance) that facilitates the bodies desired physiological response, as in working with the body's process to promote healing.

So the very basic and universal formula is 2 grams of Vitamin C (plain ascorbic acid) every 6 minutes until symptoms are gone. This formula is easy because without even knowing body weight, it's easy to figure. However in my case, knowing how much is needed, I usually would take in the slightest bit of malaise a dose of 10 grams usually every 10 minutes.

I rarely ever need to do this, because (1) my diet generally doesn't violate the Randle cycle, also known as the glycerol cycle or the glucose-fatty acid cycle.

To violate this means to combine relatively high doses of both fat and sugar sources in a meal regularly.

This results in fatty acid oxidation inhibits glucose oxidation by several mechanisms, such as increasing the ratios of [acetyl-CoA]/[CoA] and [NADH]/[NAD+] in the mitochondria, which inhibit pyruvate dehydrogenase and the citric acid cycle. This leads to an accumulation of cytosolic citrate, which inhibits phosphofructokinase-1, a key enzyme in glycolysis. This in turn leads to an increase in glucose 6-phosphate, which inhibits hexokinase, the first enzyme in glycolysis. As a result, glucose uptake and utilization are reduced when fatty acids are available as an alternative fuel source.

Anyway, if we factor in other bad habits or conditions on top of that, toxins will accumulate to a point where a purge is necessary.

However, it isn't always that simple because if we constantly bombard ourselves with certain insults, the body builds up a tolerance...this tolerance could be more of a temporary place such as the interstitium.

Up until maybe 2018, mainstream researchers did not even know the interstitium existed.

The interstitium is a term that refers to the fluid-filled spaces and connective tissues that exist between the cells and organs of the body.

So within the extracellular space (in-between cells) waste products and/or toxins migtrate into this interstitium and dump them into the lymphatic system.

So let's digress a little bit, whatever the toxin or noxious substance is, it will usually result in some type of reactive oxygen species (many researchers have been indoctrinated to believe this is a virus related thing, well it's not).

If the toxins have accumulated in the respiratory system, then we will cough. Also mucus will form to help coat the offensive toxins and eventually it and all other systems works, rid them out.

These other systems could be enzymes and processes in the Phase 1 detox or one of the many known cytochrome P450 enzymes are most important. While many things happen, we could summarize the process into their ability to take a toxin from the blood and make it able to be processed to get them out of the body.

For example, one P450, Cyp2C9, is involved with the metabolism of a large number of medications including NSAIDs, warfarin, and tamoxifen. Cyp2E1 is involved with the detoxification of many industrial pollutants, as well as carcinogens.  Cyp2E1 also metabolizes ethanol to acetaldehyde and acetate. Cyp2E1 is also responsible for bioactivating a number of carcinogens, including tobacco smoke.

Then there's phase 2 enzymes in the liver are regulated by a transcription factor called Nrf2 [nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NF-E2) p45-related factor 2]. Nrf2 is key to regulating the body’s detoxification and antioxidant system in other cells as well.

Some of the supplements often mentioned here related to hair loss protection involve this particular pathway.

There are other phases of detox, such as respiration, sweating, etc...However, the key here is that if the body is overloaded or nutrient deprived, it will not be capable of dealing with detox without a severe healing crisis.

As for myself, getting ill is very rare....for it to happen, there would have to usually be a combination of poor sleep due to stress, overextending for whatever reason, emotional stress, etc. Even then it's so slight, and a little bit of bolus dose Vitamin C will take care of it.

So let's then look at someone who uses those toxic indoor air-freshers (which pollute the air), they drink on the weekends, they eat meals loaded in both fats and sugars regularly, their stress levels are high, maybe they get irregular sleep. This kind of person will be the type who assumes they "caught" something so they think...and if bad weather occurs, a change in barometric pressure--others' like them will probably also get sick around the same time.

Barometric pressure changes can increase the concentration gradient for toxins to be released (purged).

Well, since you put it THAT way. I'll have to bone up on my orthomolecular studies to comprehend this one...which could take a few years LOL. Yeah there is a lot of stuff going on inside us that's fer sure. And too much of waste products that are not quickly got ridden of can perhaps start a gradual snow-balling effect with other things going on. Just like a nervous breakdown. Small anxieties piling up and not getting resolved can eventually be the straw that breaks the camels back and you have a full-blown meltdown and end up making front page news.

It wouldn't surprise me.

But I think that these are extreme cases. You'd think that down and out homeless people and druggies would be detoxifying like crazy all the time and not the vast majority of everyday people.

Children getting sick is another mystery to me. How do children, who are care-free and get lots of exercise and eat healthy at the dinner table along with their doting parents, reach a state where they need to detox? Yet children are among the first to come down with the "seasonal sickness".

shaftless wrote:Well, since you put it THAT way. I'll have to bone up on my orthomolecular studies to comprehend this one...which could take a few years LOL. Yeah there is a lot of stuff going on inside us that's fer sure. And too much of waste products that are not quickly got ridden of can perhaps start a gradual snow-balling effect with other things going on. Just like a nervous breakdown. Small anxieties piling up and not getting resolved can eventually be the straw that breaks the camels back and you have a full-blown meltdown and end up making front page news.

It wouldn't surprise me.

But I think that these are extreme cases. You'd think that down and out homeless people and druggies would be detoxifying like crazy all the time and not the vast majority of everyday people.

Children getting sick is another mystery to me. How do children, who are care-free and get lots of exercise and eat healthy at the dinner table along with their doting parents, reach a state where they need to detox? Yet children are among the first to come down with the "seasonal sickness".

In years past on this forum, there have been posters making interesting remarks about why some homeless people despite questionable lifestyle habits maintain a full head of hair. Also in other cases, a lot of surfers having a tendency to maintain full heads of hair.

The common theme here is, more likely to have their feet on the ground (earthing) and exposure to real sunlight, which promotes vitamin D through the skin, which activates the body's master antioxidant (Glutathione). Then we could add that homeless and perhaps even drug-addicts in some cases tend to eat less, which means less activation of the Randle cycle.

Anyway back to children, we could call this an observation of the epidemiological kind, without it being official and without any adjustments in criteria, etc.

I will speculate on the "why" of the children getting ill, some of their enzymes and detox functions are not fully advanced enough to handle some of the toxin overload, and if we look at Quack-cinated children verses the non-poisoned.

Dr. Paul Thomas, MD (pediatrician) was asked by the Oregon Medical Board to prove his alternative vaccine plan (as laid out in his book ‘The Vaccine-Friendly Plan’), and so he gathered data from his patients, comparing the \/accinated with the un\/accinated. The data shows that un\/accinated pediatric patients (kids) in his practice are significantly healthier overall than the \/accinated.

All the details are here.

http://tinyurl.com/yhd2x3ft

So, just like adults, there's diet, which will play a roll in how calm they are... and I remember a long time ago hearing how Indian babies were very calm versus western babies (non-jabbed-versus jabbed).

Unfortunately, because of the cen$or$hip, research on how trials are conducted are not real science and the ones that are do not get published, when they compare jabbed in certain countries versus non-jabbed.

Besides what the kids eat, there can be developmental and/or growth effects. For example, measles and chicken pox "victims" end up much healthier than those who do not get it.

Viruses Don't Exist and Why It Matters

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Viruses-Don't-Exist-and-Why-It-Matters:4

What do you think causes "clusters" of cases found in a particular location? It's like you can go for a long time with a lot of people together in a room or building and things are pretty normal. Then all of a sudden wham!... a whole bunch of people in that room or building come down with something at the same time.

During the pandemic nursing homes fell victim to many people dying at once from respiratory problems unexpectedly. Restaurants are another example when a bunch of people who ate at a particular place around the same time later came down with the same gastro-intestinal symptoms.

If it wasn't an identifiable "outside" toxin source like a natural gas or ammonia leak that would've made EVERYBODY in the room or building sick then it had to be something they "shared" in (possible viral transmission in nursing homes...or eating the same toxic food item in a restaurant). I can't imagine everyone deciding to detoxify...and in the same manner...and all at the same time. That would be an incredible coincidence. It makes more sense to be something in common with those affected.

And I didn't quite get that light-hearted ending in that video by Sam. Why did this anti-virus guy (on the right), who was interviewing a respected science guy (on the left), decide to brush this science guy off and basically didn't want anything to do with him after finding out that he had doubts about the existence of viruses? Man, the anti-viral interviewer should have broken out the celebratory wine glasses and cheered him for seeing things his way lol

shaftless wrote:What do you think causes "clusters" of cases found in a particular location? It's like you can go for a long time with a lot of people together in a room or building and things are pretty normal. Then all of a sudden wham!... a whole bunch of people in that room or building come down with something at the same time.

During the pandemic nursing homes fell victim to many people dying at once from respiratory problems unexpectedly. Restaurants are another example when a bunch of people who ate at a particular place around the same time later came down with the same gastro-intestinal symptoms.

If it wasn't an identifiable "outside" toxin source like a natural gas or ammonia leak that would've made EVERYBODY in the room or building sick then it had to be something they "shared" in (possible viral transmission in nursing homes...or eating the same toxic food item in a restaurant). I can't imagine everyone deciding to detoxify...and in the same manner...and all at the same time. That would be an incredible coincidence. It makes more sense to be something in common with those affected.

And I didn't quite get that light-hearted ending in that video by Sam. Why did this anti-virus guy (on the right), who was interviewing a respected science guy (on the left), decide to brush this science guy off and basically didn't want anything to do with him after finding out that he had doubts about the existence of viruses? Man, the anti-viral interviewer should have broken out the celebratory wine glasses and cheered him for seeing things his way lol

Addressing the part at the end first, the guy on the right (interviewer) saying we have to move on then.....

Anything that breaks with sponsor's ideals -- that's a curtail call....

Over years many people in this business can lose their jobs just by allowing some of this sort of footage to air.

During the scam-demic, there was sprinkles of genocide going around in a few ways....first, "Run-Death-is-Near" Remdesivir was given to many patience's who tested 'positive' for the fake thing and so then the protocol 'emergency' was called for the administration of this kidney & liver toxic drug.....people not being able to breathe, could have been that drug (the drug can cause pulmonary edema).

Then there's improper ventilation protocols. For general illness, just the FEAR or the assumption of by many via mass psychosis is enough to stimulate a drop in the body's normal biological responses.

Fear is enough to create a sense of illness.

Toxicology vs Virology – Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud F. William Engdahl is an award-winning geopolitical analyst, strategic risk consultant, author, professor and lecturer. In July 2022, he published a brilliant essay titled “Toxicology vs Virology” that exposed the Rockefeller Institute’s role in creating virology. Using Polio as an example, it outlines how fictional “viruses” are used to advance medical tyranny.

He revealed:

Flexner’s fraudulent experiments The corruption of the American Medical Association
How the Rockefellers controlled the Polio narrative The real causes of Poliomyelitis
How it relates to COVID-19 and current globalist agendas.

https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/corruption-and-medicine/toxicology-vs-virology-rockefeller-institute-and-the-criminal-polio-fraud/

Yes the use of DDT was wide spread and did harm a lot of people. But that was a later toxin. What kind of toxins could have caused this strange spinal chord inflammation and paralysis in the early days of the 1900's? A toxin that children were easily coming in contact with. That is a mystery to me.

Seems like a lot of measles cases are happening at the moment in the US. Particularly in schools affecting a lot of children. Can we blame it on the covid vaccines? You'd think that it would have showed up a lot sooner since these new RNA vaccines have been out for 3 yrs now. Delayed reaction maybe.

shaftless wrote:Yes the use of DDT was wide spread and did harm a lot of people. But that was a later toxin. What kind of toxins could have caused this strange spinal chord inflammation and paralysis in the early days of the 1900's? A toxin that children were easily coming in contact with. That is a mystery to me.

Seems like a lot of measles cases are happening at the moment in the US. Particularly in schools affecting a lot of children. Can we blame it on the covid vaccines? You'd think that it would have showed up a lot sooner since these new RNA vaccines have been out for 3 yrs now. Delayed reaction maybe.

At least once I had posted multiple types of toxins that cause polio.

Here's a site that covers some of them:

https://deeprootsathome.com/the-hidden-history-of-polio-the-disease-that-never-was/

I thot eating vegetables was fairly healthy back in the early 1900's. Heavy pesticide use would come later. But I guess there were some back then. And yeah there were a lot of elixirs for coughs and colds and teething etc. But you'd think you'd mostly end up with gastro-intestinal problems instead of spinal cord injury. Funny how their brains weren't affected with dementia-like symptoms from these lesions too since it is so closely connected to the spinal cord. But they did get headaches and fevers a lot.

Pf!zer and Project Veritas Double Agent Tells All featuring Justin Leslie

An interview from the perspective of a C0NV!D-19 skeptic who obtained a job at Pf!zer in early 2021.

https://rumble.com/v4ip6mc-e76-pfzer-and-project-veritas-double-agent-tells-all-featuring-justin-lesli.html

Written by Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

The TESTING aspect of PCR, antigen, antibody, etc. It is different from isolation and characterization, which I have discussed separately.

From the testing aspect, these tests are invalid and fraudulent. For a test to be valid, it has to be validated against a reference standard, in this case, the virus or its derived components, such as RNA or spike protein. These are not available, indicating that the virus is not available or does not exist.

This falls under the subject of analytical chemistry/metrology. The pharmaceutical industry has a similar issue, i.e., it uses non-validated tests/testers to assess the quality of products, hence no scientific validity to their claims that products are of quality. I have been highlighting this issue for more than a decade now. Below are links to two of my blog articles, written over a decade ago. The third is a journal article (not mine), which goes into more detail about the subject if you are interested.

If the FDA/USP (CDC version for pharmaceuticals) had acknowledged this problem and corrected it, these virus tests and the viruses would have never existed, and we would have never had pandemics and/or vaccines. It is all based on fraudulent testing.

In fact, there would not be any virology at all. Is this not Stefan Lanka saying that virology is a fraud? I support his view or claim but use a scientific/empirical approach, which is scientifically valid and well-accepted worldwide, to reach the same conclusion.

In short, ask for validation (report/certificate) for the test and get it audited by a third party (external to medical/pharmaceutical experts), and then see how the issue gets resolved quickly – no debate necessary!

https://bioanalyticx.com/reference-product-or-its-alternate/
https://bioanalyticx.com/the-issue-of-validation-qualification-of-dissolution-apparatuses/
https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/46/12/1907/5641136