Immortal Hair
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Check Out Our Sponsors
Brought to you by
Hair Loss Forum
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Latest topics
» *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptyYesterday at 7:12 am by CausticSymmetry

» Qwackcine horror show
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptyMon Jul 01, 2024 4:11 am by TheOne

» AutoInjectors/PenInjectors for Peptides
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptySun Jun 30, 2024 9:28 am by CausticSymmetry

» Phloroglucinol Enhances Anagen Signaling and Alleviates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress in Human Dermal Papilla Cells
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptyFri Jun 28, 2024 3:49 pm by shaftless

» Cell Therapy for Androgenetic Alopecia: Elixir or Trick?
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptyFri Jun 28, 2024 2:03 pm by MikeGore

» Curcumin-zinc framework encapsulated microneedle patch for promoting hair growth
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptyMon Jun 24, 2024 1:03 pm by Dudard

» Pfizer being sued
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptyFri Jun 21, 2024 4:32 am by CausticSymmetry

» Probiotics
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptySun Jun 16, 2024 7:51 am by CF

» Good deal on krill oil
*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 EmptySun Jun 16, 2024 6:33 am by CF

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

+16
CausticSymmetry
TheOne
Zixcreator
hairmaniac
Atlas
Rudiger
Dudard
Balthier
shukov
Jdp710
Directo
Delphine
Nuada
Live forever
imprisoned-radical
MikeGore
20 posters

Page 13 of 33 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 23 ... 33  Next

Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Tue Nov 23, 2021 3:21 am

From Igson Negrin

Virologists are confusing the public. Virologists are currently falsely posing as being able to read complete “genomes”. If we look at what all virologists in the world do the most:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=sars-cov-2

We can very easily conclude that virologists are dealing with dirty sequencing. You can watch the latest videos with Dr. Stefan Lanka and listen to his explanation.

So virologists lie about sequencing whole genomes. In reality, virologists use human material into which they insert primers. There is a blank space between the left and right primers, and virologists fill in those blanks with dirty PCR with more than 35 cycles. So, virologists first insert parts of what they are looking for, and then fill in the gaps with dirty or magical PCR.

Of course, they do not use the necessary meaningful control experiments. They do not use primers from other "viruses" in the same experiment because they would find that they use dirty PCR or magic PCR.

Given that virologists are dealing with short sequences rather than alleged complete sequences, it is very obvious that virologists are not sequencing something complete. This is proof of the self-deceiving nature of virologists and molecular geneticists.

Virologists and molecular geneticists forcibly want to use the term whole genome sequencing (WGS) even though they are doing the opposite of what they claim.

Let's hope that this anti-scientific scandal is resolved as soon as possible.

Professor Zhang did not use normal, standard thinking in science and in life. Professor Zhang did not isolate the alleged virus and then isolated the RNA from that alleged particle. He did not extract RNA from any virus, but from a human, and then allowed the computer to determine what constitutes human RNA and what bacterial RNA.

This violates the basic rules of scientific work in terms of scientific isolation of particles and their parts - nucleic acids, proteins, lipids. This is an unprecedented scandal in science that must be stopped with the help of all scientists, all people in the world. We must not allow computers to decide on reality and life, violating all the rules of common sense.

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Delphine likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Jdp710 Tue Nov 23, 2021 7:54 am

imprisoned-radical wrote:
My current perception of this whole situation is that the vaccines may induce an inhibited version of the illness caused by SARS-CoV2. Yes - I understand that the consensus on this forum is that there is no such thing as SARS-CoV2 but my opinion is different. The proposed argument in favor of the mRNA vaccines is that the spike protein generated in response to the vaccine is modified (two additional amino acids inserted), and as such it cannot exert the same effects as the spike protein on the actual virus. But as many have pointed out, this is not proven. 
My opinion and info shown online is for years the US, China, Canada and who know what other country colloborated.  Created the best bioweapon they could create and released it.  Essentially airborne HIV.  5G study has also shown makes covid worse too.  

The problem is being airborne, pathogens eventually mutate.  Nature always keeps the highest mortality pathogens to be hardest to transmit.  In china, at start, many videos showed people would walk around and just fall over.  Presumably dead.  Just like athletes are now.  Nature will quickly mutate this however.  

So vaccines are needed to continue to propogate this and the vaccine was already created at least by moderna/darpa several years ago.  

The vaccine is same as covid.  A bioweapon except much worse.  Covid was released to get everyone to take the vaccine.  And the more shots are much worse.  I have heard it mention different lots of the vaccine are worse than others.  And someone has said 20-30% of lots is saline or placebo.  

One reason is a purposely dismantling of most of the world especially western nations including the people which will see by around 2030.  Another 9 years of each year worse than the last.  

I could go on but sad stuff.  Have to plan for the long haul.

Jdp710

Posts : 470
Join date : 2017-04-10

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Mon Dec 13, 2021 8:56 am

Confirmed! Stefan Lanka is right!

Virologists produce sequences that do not exist! Jerneja Tomsic, Ph.D., is shocked by the misuse of PCR technology to test for alleged "viruses" but also the sequencing of alleged "genomes" because the number of PCR cycles applied for these two years has nothing to do with science. That number of cycles means more than 33. This is a violation of science!

1. SEQUENCING

Currently, all virologists in the world use the dirty "ARTIC" protocol with 35 cycles before they start sequencing (amplicon based "WGS"). If we look at the graph presented to the public by Jerneja Tomsic, Ph.D., we can conclude that covid virologists deal with dirty PCR with more than 35 cycles. This means that before performing sequencing, all virologists first make sequences that do not exist in the starting material. This is a total collapse of virology!

I invite all scientists in the world to further inform their colleagues as well as citizens about this revolutionary news!

2. PCR "test"

Jerneja Tomsic, Ph.D., informed the public about the anti-scientific PCR "test". Virologists are abusing PCR technology.

The complete alleged pandemic has no scientific basis because it is based on the misuse of PCR technology. All her students know that a positive PCR test can be obtained from water with an anti-scientific number of cycles. More than 33 cycles are scientifically unacceptable because sequences that are not present are obtained. With more than 40 cycles, even water will be positive.

Jerneja Tomsic holds a PhD in molecular biology. She has been using PCR technology in her work for 25 years.

graph is here: https://t.me/igsonnegrin/517

video with Jerneja Tomsic, Ph.D: https://www.facebook.com/johnblaid/posts/5326983430650500

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Live forever likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Live forever Mon Dec 13, 2021 9:02 pm

Jdp710 wrote:
imprisoned-radical wrote:
My current perception of this whole situation is that the vaccines may induce an inhibited version of the illness caused by SARS-CoV2. Yes - I understand that the consensus on this forum is that there is no such thing as SARS-CoV2 but my opinion is different. The proposed argument in favor of the mRNA vaccines is that the spike protein generated in response to the vaccine is modified (two additional amino acids inserted), and as such it cannot exert the same effects as the spike protein on the actual virus. But as many have pointed out, this is not proven. 
My opinion and info shown online is for years the US, China, Canada and who know what other country colloborated.  Created the best bioweapon they could create and released it.  Essentially airborne HIV.  5G study has also shown makes covid worse too.  

The problem is being airborne, pathogens eventually mutate.  Nature always keeps the highest mortality pathogens to be hardest to transmit.  In china, at start, many videos showed people would walk around and just fall over.  Presumably dead.  Just like athletes are now.  Nature will quickly mutate this however.  

So vaccines are needed to continue to propogate this and the vaccine was already created at least by moderna/darpa several years ago.  

The vaccine is same as covid.  A bioweapon except much worse.  Covid was released to get everyone to take the vaccine.  And the more shots are much worse.  I have heard it mention different lots of the vaccine are worse than others.  And someone has said 20-30% of lots is saline or placebo.  

One reason is a purposely dismantling of most of the world especially western nations including the people which will see by around 2030.  Another 9 years of each year worse than the last.  

I could go on but sad stuff.  Have to plan for the long haul.

"In china, at start, many videos showed people would walk around and just fall over. "

Come on, surely now 2 years later it's clear to see how staged it all was to ramp up the fear.
There is no virus in the way we're told. I even have questions about 'airborne HIV' that have not been answered.
Live forever
Live forever

Posts : 318
Join date : 2013-04-25
Location : UK

CausticSymmetry and Delphine like this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Wed Dec 15, 2021 2:04 pm

1. "consensus sequences are all constructs in our brains."
2. "the model of reality (the consensus sequence)"
3. "It is surprising, then, that scientists forget this and treat the consensus as reality."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852464/

Recall, Stefan Lanka sent a letter to the German Minister of Health about the sars-cov-2 construct because it does not exist in reality:

https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/the-end-of-corona-a-chance-for-everybody.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2e_Y4053_jbzS4saEjQTWiCfN3bpP0TcjVMsHSKd3btpiuPbjhVlnblxg

It follows from the above that the Covid "virus" is a theoretical construct in our heads and computers, not reality.
I call on all scientists in the world to tell people the truth. Covid madness is based on a mathematical construct called sars-cov-2 and is nothing more than a theoretical model that is not reality. None of the scientists should have the courage to claim that covid is a reality because it would be a hoax. Please, everyone, be very clear!

We have to be very clear! Spread this scientific information in all countries!

The covid "genome" is not a reality but a mathematical theoretical model of probability. For this reason, we cannot say or claim that there is a sars-cov-2 genome.

From this very clear scientific fact arises the question: is it scientifically justified to carry out repressive measures against people because of the construct in the minds of scientists? NO.

That is why I invite you all to tell your citizens the truth. This is not a reality, but a theory, a model, a construct in heads and computers.

Example 1: Sequencing and assembly in United Kingdome. Read about the use of the term consensus genome:

https://www.cogconsortium.uk/tool.../public-data-analysis-2/

Example 2: WHO talks about collecting consensus genomes:

https://t.me/controlexperiment/1758

More information:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852464/

Consensus Sequence Zen; Thomas D. Schneider

2. Consensus Sequence - A theoretical representative nucleotide or amino acid sequence

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh?Db=mesh&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=%22Consensus%20Sequence%22[MeSH%20Terms]&fbclid=IwAR2yI4mwZzUJgttOJaPUPKdn68QvW9no8aWuZKsC55oE5E6nFX4OJ6FTAMg

3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HYJILahPw4

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  shaftless Sat Dec 18, 2021 7:11 am

Can we consent to a sequence of events that is happening world-wide at the moment? (see what I did there?) Yes, hospitals are going nuts all over again brought on by the holiday cheer of the season. How ironic in a way...close up well wishes and hugs brings just the opposite.

Getting back to this construct thing, maybe it's just an assumed thing now that viral sequences do exist...but...isn't this based on reality at the beginning of viral research? Data that was found years ago can still be used and projected to form present day conclusions. Kinda like weather patterns. We use past info gathered thru experience and whatever to form forecasted models of storm behaviour such as hurricanes. And even predicted weather resulting from ever-increasing global temps. Trajected results may differ but one of them will be correct.

shaftless

Posts : 1361
Join date : 2012-08-12

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Sat Dec 18, 2021 12:13 pm

shaftless wrote:Can we consent to a sequence of events that is happening world-wide at the moment? (see what I did there?) Yes, hospitals are going nuts all over again brought on by the holiday cheer of the season. How ironic in a way...close up well wishes and hugs brings just the opposite.

Getting back to this construct thing, maybe it's just an assumed thing now that viral sequences do exist...but...isn't this based on reality at the beginning of viral research? Data that was found years ago can still be used and projected to form present day conclusions. Kinda like weather patterns. We use past info gathered thru experience and whatever to form forecasted models of storm behaviour such as hurricanes. And even predicted weather resulting from ever-increasing global temps. Trajected results may differ but one of them will be correct.

These are computer generated. They fill in the missing gaps-all made up.

These virologists do not use wet lab procedures, instead they are using surrogate markers.

interesting new data on Quackine injury:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZKJACgC8qOYF/


_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Sat Dec 18, 2021 1:12 pm

TERRAIN exposes the tyrannical world pandemic hoax, built upon the flawed model of illness and disease known as Germ Theory. This Two-part documentary explores Terrain Theory, a model for health that works in symbiosis with nature to promote wellness and healing, free of a corrupt and flawed medical paradigm.

TERRAIN motivates and inspires viewers to understand the power and responsibility of consent.

https://terrainthefilm.com
#TerrainTheFilm #Terrain2022

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Terrai10

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

thissucks and Delphine like this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Delphine Mon Dec 20, 2021 10:10 am

Looking forward to seeing Terrain!

Andrew Kaufman Destroys Judy Mikovits On Her Theory On Viruses
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/andrew-kaufman-destroys-judy-mikovits-on-her-theory-on-viruses_rXj6AHBtEPhHYy1.html
Delphine
Delphine

Posts : 1301
Join date : 2011-11-13

CausticSymmetry likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  shaftless Mon Dec 20, 2021 4:52 pm

Delphine wrote:Looking forward to seeing Terrain!

Andrew Kaufman Destroys Judy Mikovits On Her Theory On Viruses
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/andrew-kaufman-destroys-judy-mikovits-on-her-theory-on-viruses_rXj6AHBtEPhHYy1.html


I thought this was a bit funny cuz it was just a lot of he said/she said bickering. At the 14 min mark kaufman has an interesting reaction to judy's comment that there are papers showing viruses causing cancer. He says show me the papers and judy starts rattling off 1970 and 1980 papers and kaufman cuts her off and discredits those papers. Maybe he should have pointed out where those papers are flawed. That would have been more powerful.

And I don't see why kaufman couldn't understand the meaning of causative. A virus may not play the only role in causing disease. Other factors have to come in play too. It's like saying testosterone causes baldness. It doesn't directly but DHT coming from the conversion of testosterone shrinks the hair follicle. But testosterone still has a role to play in it all...meaning causative. Same as with a catalyst speeding up a chemical reaction...it has a role to play but it is not the true chemical reaction taking place.

So no, I don't think kaufman destroyed anybody. And why was that blonde smiling so much? Maybe she thought all that useless bickering was amusing lol.

shaftless

Posts : 1361
Join date : 2012-08-12

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Delphine Mon Dec 20, 2021 5:28 pm


Omicron: such a joke that South Africa is about to dump all contact tracing and quarantines
Alex Berenson


Yes, the scientists advising the government of South Africa - where Omicron is now the dominant strain - say tracing and quarantining the contacts of infected people is a waste of time.

This cool-headed advice is exactly the opposite of the panic in wealthy European countries (and certain blue states).

Of course - unlike wealthy European countries - South Africa has tens of millions of extremely poor people. It can no longer afford to engage in viral theater to satisfy public health fanatics over a strain that looks more and more like a cold.

The prospect of nationwide food riots will tend to concentrate the mind.

SOURCE: https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/covid-19-stop-tracing-and-quarantining-of-contacts-says-ministerial-advisory-committee-20211219
Delphine
Delphine

Posts : 1301
Join date : 2011-11-13

Nuada, thissucks and Live forever like this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:32 pm

shaftless wrote:
Delphine wrote:Looking forward to seeing Terrain!

Andrew Kaufman Destroys Judy Mikovits On Her Theory On Viruses
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/andrew-kaufman-destroys-judy-mikovits-on-her-theory-on-viruses_rXj6AHBtEPhHYy1.html


I thought this was a bit funny cuz it was just a lot of he said/she said bickering. At the 14 min mark kaufman has an interesting reaction to judy's comment that there are papers showing viruses causing cancer. He says show me the papers and judy starts rattling off 1970 and 1980 papers and kaufman cuts her off and discredits those papers. Maybe he should have pointed out where those papers are flawed. That would have been more powerful.

And I don't see why kaufman couldn't understand the meaning of causative. A virus may not play the only role in causing disease. Other factors have to come in play too. It's like saying testosterone causes baldness. It doesn't directly but DHT coming from the conversion of testosterone shrinks the hair follicle. But testosterone still has a role to play in it all...meaning causative. Same as with a catalyst speeding up a chemical reaction...it has a role to play but it is not the true chemical reaction taking place.

So no, I don't think kaufman destroyed anybody. And why was that blonde smiling so much? Maybe she thought all that useless bickering was amusing lol.

A quick point on the cancer part.

In vaccines it's the nagalase, short for Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase, which is
is a glycoside hydrolase from bacteria and animals. It diminishes GcMAF, short for
or Glycoprotein Macrophage Activating Factor. It makes or breaks Vitamin D3 function, so essentially
that is the gateway towards the immune dysfunction, which is implicated in everything from
cancer to autoimmune to autism and more.

In a cell culture, which Judy says is necessary to grow them, the toxins added for 'viral isolation' a misnomer
term, because it's not real isolation at all, but in a toxic cell culture loaded with toxic antibiotics that will
cause disease.


_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Delphine likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  shaftless Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:43 pm

I thought it was what emerges from inside a cell and not just cell death. Antibiotics are given to eliminate other forms of life like fungus and bacteria that could contaminate the sample. So what you have left emerging from a cell after centrifugation is either a foreign particle like a virus or parts of the broken cell. If exosomes are released then the genetic material in them should pretty much match the cell's genetic material you'd think. But if it doesn't then what is it? Here's (supposedly) a bunch of covid viruses emerging from lung tissue cells taken from an infected person in america...

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Vero-Covid-19-24h-hi_i034-rk
This scanning electron microscope image shows SARS-CoV-2 (yellow)—also known as 2019-nCoV, the virus that causes COVID-19—isolated from a patient in the U.S., emerging from the surface of cells (blue/pink) cultured in the lab.

.....or is it??? Could they be exosomes? Only their DNA know for sure.

https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/novel-coronavirus-sarscov2-images

shaftless

Posts : 1361
Join date : 2012-08-12

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Thu Dec 23, 2021 4:16 am

Electron micrographs are not in color and this image above is literally a computer generated image (GCI).

In the article “Virus Isolated from the First Patient with SARSCoV-2 in
Korea,” the authors admitted, “We did not obtain an electron micrograph
(n Beom Park et al, “Virus Isolated from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea,”
Journal of Korean Medical Science (February 24, 2020) showing the degree of purification.”
In other words, the authors have no idea whether or not the sample is purified, as an electron micrograph is the
only way to determine that.

They then claim to have characterized the genetic material of something they never purified,
having no idea what they were looking at. This was an important study, as it describes the first case of
“Covid-19” in Korea.

Finally, the article “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia
in China,” states: “We show an image of sediment virus particles, not purified ones.”

(Na Zhu et al, “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019,” New
England Journal of Medicine (February 20, 2020).


The researchers took nasal mucus from sick people, centrifuged it (which is not a purification step)
and then showed a fuzzy picture of what they found. Then they carried out a “genetic analysis”
of this sediment in order to characterize the “novel” coronavirus.

This type of non-scientific attempt was published in New England Journal of Medicine.
What is in the centrifuged material that these papers describe? The
centrifuged material contains bacteria and perhaps viruses, fungi, human
cells, cell debris, and anything else found in the lungs or sinus passages of a
sick person. Researchers then inoculate this unpurified mix onto “living
tissue” to make it “grow.”

Sometimes this tissue is lung cancer tissue sometimes aborted fetal tissue,
perhaps tissue from monkey kidneys.

It is a complex mixture of many components, known and
unknown. And then because this “virulent, infectious virus” won’t infect
and kill this living tissue unless you starve and poison the tissue first, you
deprive the tissue of nutrients and add oxidizing agents to “weaken” the
tissue. Then you add antibiotics to make sure it’s not bacteria that is killing
the tissue.

The tissue from this treatment naturally disintegrates into thousands of
components. Then you centrifuge this mix again to find your “virus.” At
that point, you start the PCR testing to determine the genetic and protein
makeup of this “virus.”

Unlike the proper procedure with isolating a bacteriophage (once believed to be
a 'giant virus.'

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Delphine likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Nuada Fri Dec 24, 2021 10:17 am

shaftless wrote:I thought it was what emerges from inside a cell and not just cell death. Antibiotics are given to eliminate other forms of life like fungus and bacteria that could contaminate the sample. So what you have left emerging from a cell after centrifugation is either a foreign particle like a virus or parts of the broken cell. If exosomes are released then the genetic material in them should pretty much match the cell's genetic material you'd think. But if it doesn't then what is it? Here's (supposedly) a bunch of covid viruses emerging from lung tissue cells taken from an infected person in america...

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Vero-Covid-19-24h-hi_i034-rk
This scanning electron microscope image shows SARS-CoV-2 (yellow)—also known as 2019-nCoV, the virus that causes COVID-19—isolated from a patient in the U.S., emerging from the surface of cells (blue/pink) cultured in the lab.

.....or is it??? Could they be exosomes? Only their DNA know for sure.

https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/novel-coronavirus-sarscov2-images

Most of those images are fully computer generated and some are colored via software. Electron microscope doesn't generate detailed and colored 3d images.

Nuada

Posts : 430
Join date : 2008-09-29

Delphine and Live forever like this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Sat Jan 01, 2022 6:10 am

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Founda10

The Foundational Papers -
“SARS-COV-2” study authors:
Sharon R. Lewin et al.
(The Medical Journal of Australia):

“This material was not centrifuged, so was not purified through sucrose gradient to have a density band as such. The EM images were obtained directly from cell culture material”

https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/SharonRLewin_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1w_OXqDMWVDsKDA4AA02kUjysFTDcM0JWieuDryJrdia99tKv8HzKM068

Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris
(Nature Medicine):

“The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus”

https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/MalikPeiris_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1w_OXqDMWVDsKDA4AA02kUjysFTDcM0JWieuDryJrdia99tKv8HzKM068

Myung-Guk Han et al.
(Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives):

“We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells”

https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/MyungGukHan_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1yLteEE9eaXzE0tK509IX2BbtIrMHubprdY7aNIYvsQZWS8hnZtxETSb8

Wan Beom Park et al.
(Journal of Korean Medical Science):

“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification”

https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/WanBeomPark_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1YHzXNH1RYvv0ZlBCyGFtBaC1-sWQk5FNC4yaqaJk_p7sZ-4kq05tbHfo

Na Zhu et al.
(NEJM):

“[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones”

https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/NaZhu_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1GFfFyg6mJ-4ybsFB7HJI8Lj2td41YAKJmb4vZZvcNqlJIWDaS6II7-s0

Michael Laue, representative of the German Robert Koch Institute:
"I am not aware of a paper which purified isolated SARS-CoV-2"
https://truthseeker.se/.../RKI_noSARSCoV2purification-11.pdf

Public Health England (PHE):
no record of "SARS-COV-2" isolation/purification (including "variants"):

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Public-Health-England-SARS-COV-2-v3-Redacted-2021-09-28.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2PT0BND-6DbuzP89JKpYIPr0jkd8OBfLHNJttDvLwHe12Zce4aRGGjZzA

150 institutions / >25 countries inc study authors:
no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification:


https://steemit.com/health/@johnblaid/research-summary-and-debunk-regarding-the-existence-of-sars-cov-2-and-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR3u_rY_cez3jFIygh-Av43ITN_nAXQLK734JW4fclOBMS5vqPZj4sUMzAc

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  shaftless Sat Jan 01, 2022 2:38 pm

Hmmmm...yet the cdc grows sars2 viruses in culture and gives them away free to researchers that request it. How are they able to do that and not get vilified for giving out "false" viruses?

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html

shaftless

Posts : 1361
Join date : 2012-08-12

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Sun Jan 02, 2022 4:54 am

shaftless wrote:Hmmmm...yet the cdc grows sars2 viruses in culture and gives them away free to researchers that request it. How are they able to do that and not get vilified for giving out "false" viruses?

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html

All virologists will claim that in order to "grow" the 'virus' they need a cell culture (usually it's monkey kidney cells), better known as Vero cells. When you read the methods section of any paper, that's where their "viral isolation" procedure is described. In all cases, they use animal cells plus an animal serum plus antibiotics.

Without those antibiotics, no 'virus' "evidence" will appear.

If you were to attempt to order a pure virus, it would not be possible. It's only possible to obtain
a sample within a cell culture.

Check out time mark of 25:00 (however the entire video is worth watching).

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xK7ZE6etqiya/

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Live forever likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  shaftless Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:20 pm

"giant snot cocktails"....LOOOOL

shaftless

Posts : 1361
Join date : 2012-08-12

Live forever likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Live forever Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:38 am

On the recent blowup of Malone and Rogan.

“Kudos to @amandhavollmer for finding this tweet by Dr. Malone form August. As I said before, I don't buy the hype about his recent interview on Joe Rogan. They are still all pushing the "COVID is real" psy-op/illusion, not once questioning the foundation of virology, the PCR tests and if any virus has ever been PROPERLY isolated. Malone could be the perfect COINTELPRO agent [or used as a "useful idiot" (CIA term)] to be inserted and hijack the "awakening" impulse around this scamdemic, telling skeptical people what they want to hear and appeal to a certain "consensus" fraction of the "truth community" but still distracting from the real root issue and pushing germ theory and that COVID is real and dangerous.”
Live forever
Live forever

Posts : 318
Join date : 2013-04-25
Location : UK

CausticSymmetry likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Live forever Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:20 pm

Some more here...

On 'Long c0v1d' (aka long BS)
"For long covid to exist, covid must first exist, and for covid to exist, sarscov2 must first exist. And to this day no one has any physical sample of pure sarscov2. So I think you guys and gals need to look at other directions. The book "invisible rainbow" will be very interesting to you all. And btw, for fatigue and health in general, fresh raw ginger juice is great. Take huge amount every day. I took about 100grams for 24hrs and no more mental physical tiredness 24/7. Plus bad body odor disappeared. It has zinc for the lymphatic system and production of glutathione and something that improves the mitochondria function. To produce energy. Turmeric is also good. Especially as it's radioprotective."

ON ROGAN AND MALONE.
"I finally got around to listening to it.
It was painful.
It was like listening to two guys who have been pumped through and through with the mainstream narrative and still buy into the bogeyman bug narrative but only question governmental response to it.
Such a Painful listen.
Loved how they went on about how “I had the Delta variant,” “I had the Omicron variant,” “I had ‘long Covid,” and et cetera.
Too funny!
Is there a testing means that differentiates between the variants?
Rogan asked Doctor Malone this but Malone skirted it by saying Delta variant causes hospitalizations while Omicron rarely does.
That’s the explanation we are given from a top virologist …
Again, is there a test that differentiates between the “variants?”
Of course not.
The answer is, No.
Was there any talk about the isolation / purification and proof of contagion with the original bogeyman bug and / or the so-called variants?
Of course not.
Why?
Because there is none.
So, the vast majority of the talk was based upon an unproven narrative.
It was based on a Big Lie.
And Doctor Robert Malone is a top virologist, who admittedly, has published papers with at least one CIA agent / buddy.
The whole thing stinks.
They brought up some good stuff, especially near the end: flawed testing, jibby-jab “side effects,” VAERS, mass formation psychosis, the social credit system, and so on but if you’re a seeker that has been down this road, the interview was a very painful listen - especially when you have to suffer through over two hours of garbage to get to this point.
Are they controlled op?
Who the hell knows.
They may as well be though.
They actually mention all the athletes dropping in the middle of play due to myocarditis and strokes and Doctor Malone states that some of these cases could be due to the bogeyman bug, the jabs, or a combination.
Too funny.
A doctor …
Thanks for the laugh.
We all know what it’s from.
If one is a total sleeper there are a few good stepping stones to get you going in the right direction, if you’re motivated to find the truth.
Guys like these two are still needed - most people are not going to take the time to research something you give them that comes straight out and proves all of virology is pseudoscience. Sleepers need little baby steps like this.
They’re not likely going to be willing to read “Virus Mania” or AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire,” for example.
Doctor Malone referred to RFK’s book a couple times.
RFK’s book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” is an awesome book for sleepers - if you can get them to read it. The first four chapters are a painful read for a seeker but are great for sucking a sleeper into some very serious questions to follow throughout the rest of the book.
Hard to believe Doctor Malone has actually read RFK’s book and still believes much in virology.
RFK’s book covers the Flexner Report, the history of Rockefeller medicine, exposes the AIDS sham, references “Virus Mania” several times throughout, and et cetera.
Hard to believe a virologist wouldn’t seriously be questioning virology after reading it.
But then again, Doctor Malone admits that he has worked with every “epidemic” since AIDS, is on friendly terms with Fauci, has gotten funding from NIH, and et cetera.
Huge red flags.
It was painful listening to them describe mass formation psychosis and seeing that they are still very much stuck in it themselves - as long as they’re unwilling to question the very existence of these bogeyman bugs - as long as they’re not willing to hit the brakes and go back to square one.
Doctor Malone goes on about the “gain of function” bioweapon nonsense.
Before you can trot on, claiming that it is a bioweapon, You Have To Prove It Exists.
Sorry, patents and gain of function paper trails are not proof.
Show isolation / purification and proof of contagion.
Sorry, a petri dish soup is not isolation / purification.
Go find me isolation / purification, for starters.

Spoiler Alert: You will not find it.”

Live forever
Live forever

Posts : 318
Join date : 2013-04-25
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Live forever Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:50 am

Live forever wrote:Some more here...

On 'Long c0v1d' (aka long BS)
"For long covid to exist, covid must first exist, and for covid to exist, sarscov2 must first exist. And to this day no one has any physical sample of pure sarscov2. So I think you guys and gals need to look at other directions. The book "invisible rainbow" will be very interesting to you all. And btw, for fatigue and health in general, fresh raw ginger juice is great. Take huge amount every day. I took about 100grams for 24hrs and no more mental physical tiredness 24/7. Plus bad body odor disappeared. It has zinc for the lymphatic system and production of glutathione and something that improves the mitochondria function. To produce energy. Turmeric is also good. Especially as it's radioprotective."

ON ROGAN AND MALONE.
"I finally got around to listening to it.
It was painful.
It was like listening to two guys who have been pumped through and through with the mainstream narrative and still buy into the bogeyman bug narrative but only question governmental response to it.
Such a Painful listen.
Loved how they went on about how “I had the Delta variant,” “I had the Omicron variant,” “I had ‘long Covid,” and et cetera.
Too funny!
Is there a testing means that differentiates between the variants?
Rogan asked Doctor Malone this but Malone skirted it by saying Delta variant causes hospitalizations while Omicron rarely does.
That’s the explanation we are given from a top virologist …
Again, is there a test that differentiates between the “variants?”
Of course not.
The answer is, No.
Was there any talk about the isolation / purification and proof of contagion with the original bogeyman bug and / or the so-called variants?
Of course not.
Why?
Because there is none.
So, the vast majority of the talk was based upon an unproven narrative.
It was based on a Big Lie.
And Doctor Robert Malone is a top virologist, who admittedly, has published papers with at least one CIA agent / buddy.
The whole thing stinks.
They brought up some good stuff, especially near the end: flawed testing, jibby-jab “side effects,” VAERS, mass formation psychosis, the social credit system, and so on but if you’re a seeker that has been down this road, the interview was a very painful listen - especially when you have to suffer through over two hours of garbage to get to this point.
Are they controlled op?
Who the hell knows.
They may as well be though.
They actually mention all the athletes dropping in the middle of play due to myocarditis and strokes and Doctor Malone states that some of these cases could be due to the bogeyman bug, the jabs, or a combination.
Too funny.
A doctor …
Thanks for the laugh.
We all know what it’s from.
If one is a total sleeper there are a few good stepping stones to get you going in the right direction, if you’re motivated to find the truth.
Guys like these two are still needed - most people are not going to take the time to research something you give them that comes straight out and proves all of virology is pseudoscience. Sleepers need little baby steps like this.
They’re not likely going to be willing to read “Virus Mania” or AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire,” for example.
Doctor Malone referred to RFK’s book a couple times.
RFK’s book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” is an awesome book for sleepers - if you can get them to read it. The first four chapters are a painful read for a seeker but are great for sucking a sleeper into some very serious questions to follow throughout the rest of the book.
Hard to believe Doctor Malone has actually read RFK’s book and still believes much in virology.
RFK’s book covers the Flexner Report, the history of Rockefeller medicine, exposes the AIDS sham, references “Virus Mania” several times throughout, and et cetera.
Hard to believe a virologist wouldn’t seriously be questioning virology after reading it.
But then again, Doctor Malone admits that he has worked with every “epidemic” since AIDS, is on friendly terms with Fauci, has gotten funding from NIH, and et cetera.
Huge red flags.
It was painful listening to them describe mass formation psychosis and seeing that they are still very much stuck in it themselves - as long as they’re unwilling to question the very existence of these bogeyman bugs - as long as they’re not willing to hit the brakes and go back to square one.
Doctor Malone goes on about the “gain of function” bioweapon nonsense.
Before you can trot on, claiming that it is a bioweapon, You Have To Prove It Exists.
Sorry, patents and gain of function paper trails are not proof.
Show isolation / purification and proof of contagion.
Sorry, a petri dish soup is not isolation / purification.
Go find me isolation / purification, for starters.

Spoiler Alert: You will not find it.”


Would like to add, I suppose in the long run this may be a step in the right direction ( a few have rightfully pulled me up for seeking 'purity' or something - which is fair enough from their perspective) but I still think we need to maintain caution with these people no matter what. Truth is the north star *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 1f31f
Live forever
Live forever

Posts : 318
Join date : 2013-04-25
Location : UK

CausticSymmetry likes this post

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:28 am

Also listened to the entire interview. I'm doubtful that it's controlled op, more likely they just believe they believe the lies
they were taught. People in general religiously adhere to the lies and they are not even aware there's another
viewpoint, and usually when confronted with it, they ignore it.

It's easier to prove that germ and virus theory is false, and all experiments to 'prove' germ or virus theory is real always fail. But to the indoctrinated, facts do not matter.

Collectivism is what happens. Many lay people indoctrinated alike assume "transmission" is something that happens without question, it's part of popular culture. However, when faced with real scientific method (including control experiments), they false assumptions fail to be validated as real things.

Putrefaction and decomposing matter is part of the bacteria ecosystem, all necessary. The germ theory is akin to believing that flies produce trash.

As for viru$es, waste coming out of the cell is debris. There is no way to actually witness a live cell to prove a "virus" takes over the cell machinery.




_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Jdp710 Thu Jan 06, 2022 5:23 am

Kurt Olbrich of grayfieldoptical.com created a Rife type microscope at least as far back as 90’s.  They use to sell for about $500,000 but the price has been dropped to under $100,000 thanks to China.  The microscope like Rife microscope is Capable of viewing live pathogens as well as live viruses.  If I’m not mistaken he even met Rife to discuss microscope technology.

Kurt Olbrich mentions Frequencies in the MHz range was noted to increase replication and virulence of the virus.  The most important thing though is that these pathogens are pleomorphic which goes along with what Rife said.  Rife said there are only a couple viruses.  Everything shapeshifts depending on the environment.  Bacteria, fungi, spore form viruses, etc all the same basically depending on environment.  There is a long video can post under regarding the microscope.  Photos of live HIV, cancer Viruses, etc..  It’s interesting.  But the important thing I keep in mind is you have SV40 virus was injected in world population many decades ago and is most likely responsible for millions to have got cancer and died.  Same is happening again but this time I relieve it’s a deliberate attempt.  

Regarding this pleomorphism, Japan dropped mycoplasma fermentans on whole islands as a debilitating agent.  The US did something similar in Korean War.  They don’t need to drop a “virus” on a population.  They can use any number of pathogens with the help a toxic body to cause a desired outcome because of pleomorphism.  Graphene oxide maybe?  

At least 15 years ago it was heavily dropped on worldwide populations of morgellons fibers, with various metals and other pathogens.  One researcher would climb a mountain, place a cloth on top of the mountain and analyze the sample and could tell when they were dropped on populations.  

This research took a sharp turn when it was being found nanotechnology was also occurring.  Much like covid is now.  Nanotechnology is being deployed.  Anyone with a $60 microscope and UV light can do this research.  Sadly, everybody I’ve tested has morgellons fibers 10 years ago except for animals don’t seem to get them which potentially indicate morgellons fibers are prions and maybe even an advanced flouridation method to considering it’s a prion.  Old hair brush samples do not have them so it’s all a recent phenomenon and some say is connected with glycophospate or GMO foods.  As again, the pathogen needs a specific heavy metal or toxin to act as an anchor for this pleomorphism.

Point being, frequencies, heavy metal and/or toxin, pleomorphism all connected with covid and potentially chemtrailed over certain cities and I suspect over produce areas.  And now this year most are vaccinating themselves which is best way for them to get their desired outcome.  

Most people worry about person to person contact but that’s lowest on my list of priorities.  That’s mostly conditioning from movies.  The highest priorities is avoidance of vaccines, EMF’s, heavy metals and toxins and a strong healthy body.  But sadly with EMF, they now have 5G basically on every lamp post worldwide. One across the street from my house.

You have things like the black plaque for instance but back in those times people lived in absolutely filthy conditions.  Hantavirus.  Heavy exposure to mouse droppings.  Spanish flu, probable tin can use with bad vaccines.  Hong Kong flu from potentially satellites (EMF).

Jdp710

Posts : 470
Join date : 2017-04-10

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  CausticSymmetry Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:54 am

Pleomorphism = altered terrain (change of bacteria to morph into different environments). It's their waste product that is harmful.

The key is eliminating the toxin.

Most cancers are oral pathology (until those teeth are treated), cancer will not disappear. Then you've got Quackines, which disrupt GcMAF (unravels vitamin D activating factor) by way of nagalase.

Blue Shield harmonizes EMG, Wiifi, 5G, etc.

Fungi, microorganisms all have essential jobs. The longer we stay enslaved by 200 year paradigms, the longer the industry will destroy lifesaving due to medical bankruptcy.

Replace the word viru$ with toxin.

_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen

Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
CausticSymmetry
CausticSymmetry
Admin

Posts : 14280
Join date : 2008-07-09

http://www.immortalhair.org/

Back to top Go down

*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist* - Page 13 Empty Re: *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 13 of 33 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 23 ... 33  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum