*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

shaftless wrote:Does anyone want to venture what's killing otherwise healthy gay men other than the AIDS virus? Too much rough sex perhaps?

Intercourse has no place in AID's, it's been looked at, and despite everything we've heard, it's never been supported scientifically.  

I remember when I worked several years at a large clinic. We had protocols for lots of diseases, also lists of diseases that were excluded from treatment.

"HIV/AIDS" being on the included list, but wondered that not once had I heard about anyone ever coming in for this, not once.

Already had reservations and high level of skepticism about the disease really being that we were told what it is.

AIDS is really an acronym for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

Translating medical acronyms into pure English - Anything that contains the word, syndrome it means
there's no specific cause of the disease. It really means a group of signs and symptoms that occur together and characterize a particular abnormality or condition with no known etiology (cause).

This merely means that there are hundreds, maybe thousands of reasons why the immune system is not functioning properly. It's a description of the state, not a specific disease. AIDS is usually caused by poisoning.

So what are the cause(s)?

Lots of threads dedicated to this many times before.

Here's a short list, but it's probably much longer.

AZT, chemotherapy, dozens of immunosuppressant drugs.

Here's a website that unpacks more details on the AIDS hoax:

http://whale.to/a/aids_umbrella_h.html

AHA!!! This is taken from the U.S. National Library of Medicine. NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information.

"Electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) instead employs a porous support film, to which the specimen is adsorbed and flash-frozen. Specimens preserved in vitreous ice over holes in the support film can then be imaged without additional staining. Cryo-EM, coupled with single-particle image analysis techniques, makes it possible to examine the size, structure and arrangement of coronavirus structural components in fully hydrated, native virions. Two virus purification procedures are described."


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7121280/

shaftless wrote:AHA!!! This is taken from the U.S. National Library of Medicine. NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information.

"Electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) instead employs a porous support film, to which the specimen is adsorbed and flash-frozen. Specimens preserved in vitreous ice over holes in the support film can then be imaged without additional staining. Cryo-EM, coupled with single-particle image analysis techniques, makes it possible to examine the size, structure and arrangement of coronavirus structural components in fully hydrated, native virions. Two virus purification procedures are described."


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7121280/

I looked at the "Methods" section, which suffers from all the usual flaws in claims of "isolation" and "purification."

A much more detailed explanation can be found in this video at the 206:59 mark.

shaftless wrote:Does anyone want to venture what's killing otherwise healthy gay men other than the AIDS virus? Too much rough sex perhaps?

I think back in the day, there was a lot of drug overuse(negatively effected auto immunesystem), mostly in progressive communities, which included lots of gay people and prostitutes.
Also AZT itself(aids medicine) killed lots of people as well, which was also an emergency approved drug(people in the placebo group started dying earlier than the AZT group so they concluded that it was effective).

There is a pretty good article about this(gotta warn you it is pretty long) :
https://www.spin.com/featured/aids-and-the-azt-scandal-spin-1989-feature-sins-of-omission/

Nuada wrote:

shaftless wrote:Does anyone want to venture what's killing otherwise healthy gay men other than the AIDS virus? Too much rough sex perhaps?

I think back in the day, there was a lot of drug overuse(negatively effected auto immunesystem), mostly in progressive communities, which included lots of gay people and prostitutes.
Also AZT itself(aids medicine) killed lots of people as well, which was also an emergency approved drug(people in the placebo group started dying earlier than the AZT group so they concluded that it was effective).

There is a pretty good article about this(gotta warn you it is pretty long) :
https://www.spin.com/featured/aids-and-the-azt-scandal-spin-1989-feature-sins-of-omission/

This is just not convincing enough to me. Drug use was rampant during the 60s and 70s even by heterosexual people. The vast differential in the occurrence of AIDS in gay men during the 80s just does not seem explainable through this reasoning.

imprisoned-radical wrote:

Nuada wrote:

shaftless wrote:Does anyone want to venture what's killing otherwise healthy gay men other than the AIDS virus? Too much rough sex perhaps?

I think back in the day, there was a lot of drug overuse(negatively effected auto immunesystem), mostly in progressive communities, which included lots of gay people and prostitutes.
Also AZT itself(aids medicine) killed lots of people as well, which was also an emergency approved drug(people in the placebo group started dying earlier than the AZT group so they concluded that it was effective).

There is a pretty good article about this(gotta warn you it is pretty long) :
https://www.spin.com/featured/aids-and-the-azt-scandal-spin-1989-feature-sins-of-omission/

This is just not convincing enough to me. Drug use was rampant during the 60s and 70s even by heterosexual people. The vast differential in the occurrence of AIDS in gay men during the 80s just does not seem explainable through this reasoning.

I haven't done the research myself so this was an explanation I read somewhere. I think the best bet is to look at statistics. Was there a significant difference between the number of heterosexual people and gay people among the groups that used drugs in late 70's early 80's or not. Not sure if such statistic exists though.

But the part about AZT is pretty significant. There are lots of HIV+ people who died after using the medicine and they kinda swept it under the rug saying that "they would die of aids anyway" which obviously wasn't a certainty.

imprisoned-radical wrote:

They don't watch TV Wink

I think a lot of this is to do with cognitive ability, in that there seem to be those among us who are very perceptive
(for whatever reason) and sensitive to the mainstream BS.

When locked into a state of mind, it is very hard to see beyond the cage.
The good news is, this cage is self-made, and with a bit of faith/courage you can
unmake it. I see a lot of the replies to CS here hold a certain (in my view faulty)
concept of their perceptions.

We have a medical system which does not build upon the innate healing powers of individuals,
but instead enslaves people to long-term dependency on drugs from birth to death.

Protective illusions block reality.

Yes the power of the mind and emotions is definitely significant, and can impact the health. But saying there are 600k additional dead in the US alone, the 400k dead in India, etc., because they watched TV and were inoculated with fear is an extreme overextension, well into the realm absurdity. If anything, these are the countries were people were going around saying "it's a hoax" and so they rejected the fear. A lot of good it did them.

Your next argument would be that the death counts are fabricated by the "MSM". Say that to the people who have lost family members.

What would be your argument at that point? "That there were actually no deaths. Just alien abductions. All coordinated by the Deep State."

Did they die *from* it, or *with* it ?

For what it's worth, everyone I know who 'tested positive' for it, recovered within a week.

Here in the UK, we know we're being lied to, and so people are using the FOI (freedom of information act)
to get information about the number of deaths direct from the so-called virus... and the numbers are so low
in some cases, that they cannot disclose the information! So our media has been lying with statistics for over
a year now...it's bitter sweet - the bitter being our government and media has waged an all out psychological
attack on it's people... the sweet is that, nobody has gotten seriously ill and died more than any other year.

Some people have even used the FOI to get information from crematoriums and funeral directors, and when
you look at the numbers across the last 10 years... 2020 was lower!

I do believe there is a pandemic, and it's cause are the three following points.

1. One-Sided Materialistic View of Origins of Diseases
2. The Negative Impacts of Fear in the Case of Epidemics
3. The Prevalent Faith in Medical-Scientific Authorities

So called HIV is not a virus, it's material everyone already has (6th chromosome).

AIDS not caused by a virus, not transmitted by anyone.

"Big" medical controls the narrative on Tell-Lie-Vision, so yes they have been lying the entire time
about the deaths.

They have been lying about Ebola, Measles, HIV, delivering half-truths. We've talked about the origins of these
"other viral-outbreaks here before and their origins."

Just like in the late 80's, they were using PCR (Anthony Fauci) did exactly the same thing, using a test
that doesn't diagnose diseases and using an experimental drug (AZT) to profit and with bad results.

Statistically speaking, deaths were unchanged, other than the cases of the flu being switched for CV, and also higher number of suicides than normal for obvious reasons.

What isn't getting reported by MSM is all the deaths and injuries from the experimental injection.

CDC are a for profit company (they are not objective), WHO answers to their donors, we know who the biggest donor is. If you follow the money it makes sense.

The WHO (World Hoax Organization) is spreading dangerous lies about quackcines, face diapers (masks) and PCR tests, underlying untruths. The WHO is the main culprit and has issued an order to all health professionals that they must propagate the lie about death that does not exist. The WHO has made an agreement with all social platforms to censor anyone who presents evidence of a c0r0naviru$, a quackcine, to immediately censor and block.

In addition, there are the stakeholders who wield influence.

If there's any doubt about this, whether one believes in the official narrative or not, check out this link, a doctor
reveals a lot policy decisions that make only logical sense for profiteers, not human health.

https://immortalhair.forumotion.com/t13104-mainstream-cv-believing-doctor-explains-inexplicable-policy-decisions

CausticSymmetry wrote:

So called HIV is not a virus, it's material everyone already has (6th chromosome).

AIDS not caused by a virus, not transmitted by anyone.

"Big" medical controls the narrative on Tell-Lie-Vision, so yes they have been lying the entire time
about the deaths.

They have been lying about Ebola, Measles, HIV, delivering half-truths. We've talked about the origins of these
"other viral-outbreaks here before and their origins."

Just like in the late 80's, they were using PCR (Anthony Fauci) did exactly the same thing, using a test
that doesn't diagnose diseases and using an experimental drug (AZT) to profit and with bad results.

Statistically speaking, deaths were unchanged, other than the cases of the flu being switched for CV, and also higher number of suicides than normal for obvious reasons.

What isn't getting reported by MSM is all the deaths and injuries from the experimental injection.

CDC are a for profit company (they are not objective), WHO answers to their donors, we know who the biggest donor is. If you follow the money it makes sense.

The WHO (World Hoax Organization) is spreading dangerous lies about quackcines, face diapers (masks) and PCR tests, underlying untruths. The WHO is the main culprit and has issued an order to all health professionals that they must propagate the lie about death that does not exist. The WHO has made an agreement with all social platforms to censor anyone who presents evidence of a c0r0naviru$, a quackcine, to immediately censor and block.

In addition, there are the stakeholders who wield influence.

If there's any doubt about this, whether one believes in the official narrative or not, check out this link, a doctor
reveals a lot policy decisions that make only logical sense for profiteers, not human health.

https://immortalhair.forumotion.com/t13104-mainstream-cv-believing-doctor-explains-inexplicable-policy-decisions

Is there a source for the numbers on that image ? I couldn't get them from the eudravigilance.

https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com/2021/05/26/12184-dead-1196190-injuries-european-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-vaccines/

Stefan Lanka won the trial in Germany, and this epochal court process provided an introduction to the New Scientific Reality.

The process of changing consciousness and publishing detailed scientific evidence is underway. What is remarkable is that this process is very active, but also in the end, with great consequences for virology and all "C0V!D" measures.
Let's remember.

Stefan Lanka won the trial in Germany:

The judgment reads: "CLAIMANT HAS FAILED TO MEET THE CRITERION OF UNDERTAKING TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF THE MEASLES VIRUS BY A SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION." (paragraph 122)
Source: OLG Stuttgart judgment of February 16, 2016, 12 U 63/15

http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1&fbclid=IwAR2IDFvfXZdAyCPRme5yw7_PPh84ArnH0BJbM3Xn3HKvbFDrRlSpJ4NbZlE

Judgment by OLG Stuttgart from 16.2.2016 of BGH's decision from 1.12.2016 it became final. * The Federal Court (German: Bundesgerichtshof, BGH)

This decision of the court not only disputed the existence of the measles virus, but also refers to the complete virology. This lawsuit has empowered scientists around the world to participate together in detailed control experiments for virology in 2021.

We expect that detailed scientific evidence leading to the prohibition of all "C0V!D" measures adopted due to misinterpretation of experimental results in virology will be presented to the public soon.

*You’ve probably read that Facebook checkers misinform the public about this topic. Always read court decisions, not corrupt 'fact' checker’s misinformation.

CausticSymmetry wrote:Stefan Lanka won the trial in Germany, and this epochal court process provided an introduction to the New Scientific Reality.

The process of changing consciousness and publishing detailed scientific evidence is underway. What is remarkable is that this process is very active, but also in the end, with great consequences for virology and all "C0V!D" measures.
Let's remember.

Stefan Lanka won the trial in Germany:

The judgment reads: "CLAIMANT HAS FAILED TO MEET THE CRITERION OF UNDERTAKING TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF THE MEASLES VIRUS BY A SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION." (paragraph 122)
Source: OLG Stuttgart judgment of February 16, 2016, 12 U 63/15

http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1&fbclid=IwAR2IDFvfXZdAyCPRme5yw7_PPh84ArnH0BJbM3Xn3HKvbFDrRlSpJ4NbZlE

Judgment by OLG Stuttgart from 16.2.2016 of BGH's decision from 1.12.2016 it became final. * The Federal Court (German: Bundesgerichtshof, BGH)

This decision of the court not only disputed the existence of the measles virus, but also refers to the complete virology. This lawsuit has empowered scientists around the world to participate together in detailed control experiments for virology in 2021.

We expect that detailed scientific evidence leading to the prohibition of all "C0V!D" measures adopted due to misinterpretation of experimental results in virology will be presented to the public soon.

*You’ve probably read that Facebook checkers misinform the public about this topic. Always read court decisions, not corrupt 'fact' checker’s misinformation.

Bring on the erasure of the faulty tyrannical theory of viruses. May the Truth win out! Imagine the good that could replace it.

Great thread, guys!

More good grist for this mill:
https://truth11.com/2020/08/22/viruses-are-exosomes-which-are-excretions-of-toxic-cells-exosomes-are-not-transmittable-hydroxychloroquine-works-by-digesting-toxins-not-viruses-covid-19-is-a-completely-manufactured-fake-pa/
Viruses Are Exosomes, Which are Excretions Of Toxic Cells | Exosomes Are Not Transmittable | Hydroxychloroquine Works By Digesting Toxins, Not Viruses | COVID-19 Is A Completely Manufactured Fake Pandemic, There Is No Virus Or Disease | the Real Truth About Hydroxychloroquine – It Is Part of the Alice in Wonderland Program

I have a question that's been bugging me for some time, about the conclusions of Semmelweiss, that women were dying in childbirth because the doctors weren't washing their
hands before attending the birth. I was trying to explain to my son that germ theory is bogus, and he trotted out the Semmelweiss story to support it.

I still don't buy germ theory, but would appreciate insights on this.
http://scihi.org/ignaz-semmelweis/

Delphine wrote:

Great thread, guys!  

More good grist for this mill:
https://truth11.com/2020/08/22/viruses-are-exosomes-which-are-excretions-of-toxic-cells-exosomes-are-not-transmittable-hydroxychloroquine-works-by-digesting-toxins-not-viruses-covid-19-is-a-completely-manufactured-fake-pa/
Viruses Are Exosomes, Which are Excretions Of Toxic Cells | Exosomes Are Not Transmittable | Hydroxychloroquine Works By Digesting Toxins, Not Viruses | COVID-19 Is A Completely Manufactured Fake Pandemic, There Is No Virus Or Disease | the Real Truth About Hydroxychloroquine – It Is Part of the Alice in Wonderland Program

I have a question that's been bugging me for some time, about the conclusions of Semmelweiss, that women were dying in childbirth because the doctors weren't washing their
hands before attending the birth.  I was trying to explain to my son that germ theory is bogus, and he trotted out the Semmelweiss story to support it.  

I still don't buy germ theory, but would appreciate insights on this.  
http://scihi.org/ignaz-semmelweis/

It's simple to explain, and ironically I use the Semmelweiss story to analogize how difficult it is to break collective ideas--to show that throughout time, the truth usually stands with the minority, not the majority.

So imagine this scenario, birthing mothers' knew that the routine high death rate in hospitals was astronomical. They were afraid to not to do home births. At that time doctors routinely delivered babies immediately after performing autopsies.

When we're dealing with necrotic tissue (dying tissue). The bacteria are deadly because they are consuming dying tissue. Their waste product is called bacterial endotoxin.

Bluntly stated, crap from dying tissue (from dead people) is not going to bring health to a newborn baby. However, at the same time, germ theory has been taken too far, because "modern" obstetrics is extremely dangerous for being too "hygiene" oriented. if the newborn baby doesn't acquire enough of the mother's bacteria a lot of problem emerge, and dozens of other terrible, modern ideas that exist for profit, not the health of the baby or the mother for that matter.

When kids are given too many antibiotics before their immune system develops, they get a lifetime of allergies. Households who routinely "disinfect" everything tend to have poor health. Germ phobia is doesn't discriminate between bacteria in a waste environment versus a healthy environment. So it's the sh*t/crap from the bacteria, not the bacteria itself.

Animals given corn and soy (not their native foods) instead of grass quickly get bacterial infections. Their bacteria get bad (because they subsist on junk). these animals have metabolic diseases, and why they're given antibiotics. They wouldn't need these at all if the animals were fed just pasture.

On a recent show, might have been History Channel, they featured the story of Kraft, the company that makes Kraft cheese. Around a century ago, those large round cheese bundles could go bad quickly, as the natural process of bacterial breakdown or spoilage would occur.

Kraft was obsessed with how to find a way to prevent cheese spoilage. It took him three years of experimentation. Refrigeration was not around. So, like they did in beer, he discovered that pasteurizing the cheese plus adding an emulsifier, like sodium phosphate and acids to keep the fat and oil from separating.

Prior to this idea, all the other cheese on the market went bad (spoiled very quickly) and a lot people suffered from diphtheria and tuberculosis as a result. Notice how they credit Quackines preventing diphtheria---nonsense.

Thank you CS. that makes sense and really clarifies the situation for me.  I guess I will share with my son, although the
whole question is a bit of a minefield for us currently.  

Ironically, he animated a show for NPR about the importance of gut flora including in babies.  So he knows the importance of
"good" bacteria.  Too bad that show didn't discuss the Semmelweiss question.  

CS, would you say vaccines~sorry, quackines in general mess with the microbiome?

Delphine - Yes, the "Quackcines" appear to alter gut microbiotia. Depending on what is printed out there---so many journals fill the abstracts full of platitudes about Quackines..but often hidden within the full body of the text, some of the "real meat" can be found.

The NPR video wasn't bad for a mainstream one, but still suffers from the normal propaganda, such as making the statement about "good" and "bad" bacteria. They are all good.

The piece of info that's missing is that bacteria when entering into a bad body condition/environment will go through a transformation, and whatever they are eating will determine how toxic the effects are.

Here's the kicker, studies ignored by Quacine-worshiping industry types do not seem to be making the connection that heavily Quackcined children have significantly more hospitalizations, colds and flues, and the "need" for antibiotics.

If they only knew that the proper minerals and trace minerals that feed the microbiota and enhance detoxification measures never rely on antibiotics (anti-life).

Health is almost as simple as taking out the cellular garbage. Unfortunately much more difficult because of Quackines,
antibiotics, glyphosate (which is a type of chelator and antibiotic) and soils depleted in minerals.

Probiotics help produce vitamins and help detoxify heavy metals and other persistent toxins...but many are irreplaceable varieties outside of getting a fecal transplant.

The NPR video wasn't bad for a mainstream one, but still suffers from the normal propaganda, such as making the statement about "good" and "bad" bacteria. They are all good.


CS, you did state that the bacteria from necrotic tissue was "deadly" and the reason for women dying in childbirth.  How does that square with
bacteria being "all good"?

I am on board with your statements about  what is really needed for health building, and what is not (quackines, antibiotics, glyphosates etc.).

It's what the bacteria are eating that makes all the difference.

Eating necrotic issue will cause the toxic excrement (the crap or bacterial endotoxin) emitted from the bacteria.

The same principles applies to washing our hands after using the toilet--no desire to accidentally ingest this stuff, as the gut bacteria in our own gut eating our toxic waste. However, exposure to open wounds or cuts is where real infection can happen.

So for example, we all have Escherichia coli, also known as E. coli in our gut, yet many people
think this is bad....the real difference is what they are eating. Escherichia coli infections really means they've got a load of toxins to be eaten. What gets the blame? Rarely the toxin.

Most cases of illness occur to due to unclean water, sanitation, agricultural run-off, etc.

There's no such thing as airborne contagion. Unless we focus on a toxin, like cyanide or radiation.

Just like cholesterol helps patch up damaged blood vessels, bacteria act as a janitor or clean-up crew to
deal with our waste.

When the birthing canal is open so much more vulnerable to the elements. In normal conditions, our skin act as a barrier.

So yeah, it comes down to cleaning out the cellular garbage.
But there are fine points in all of this that I think are beyond comprehension of the average Joe.

People are mentally lazy and so they fall for the germ theory of illness. Including most doctors!

This guy is a "functional medicine" practitioner and he's fallen for the narrative also.
https://chriskresser.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-coronavirus-with-dr-ramzi-asfour/

I never wash my hands after using toilet btw. I wasn't taught to do it growing up.
I've always been pretty healthy regardless. Of course everyone ought to do what feels right to them.

It seems that all people and clinicians have been mislead into the idea of viruses and germ theory.

In many occasions, even 10 years ago on this forum we explored alternative ideas to what "viruses" really
were or their purpose. The best I could reckon based on empirical observation was that they were nothing more than part of a detoxification reaction or an instrument of detoxification.

I saw people with supposed viral diseases being quickly normalized with potent IV-antioxidants like lipoic acid, GSH, Vitamin C, etc.

In those days, many people really were stuck on the idea of STD's, AIDS, herpes as if how could they not be caused by viruses, but not ready to know how many other lies that needed to be unpacked to get the idea of persistent toxins causing these things, or misconceptions of illness.

Books like - "Doctors Are More Harmful Than Germs: How Surgery Can Be Hazardous to Your Health - And What to Do About It" opened my mind even more that viruses were probably a phantom creation for industry.  And yes, germs are nothing, it's all about the terrain. Was never really sold on germ theory or virus theory because it defied some logic.

https://amzn.to/3iC4psR

For example a patient cured of hepatitis-C once their IUD was taken out. Between that and seeing patients
nullified viral load with IV-antioxidant therapy, it became very plausible that so-called hepatitis types was different severity of liver inflammation.  

Now, because of Stefan Lanka's work, it's very clear. Viruses are nothing more than the cytopathic effect of cells, or the reaction of being poisoned.

Then there's the experiences of Aajonus Vonderplantiz - Someone jokes in the comment section: "salmonella brain washing is strong with these doctors."



This video inspired thousands of people around the world to eat raw meat.

I think the key message that gets lost into physician indoctrination is that germs are the cycle of life. The idea that they cause disease is like saying that flies create garbage.

When food is cooked and left out long enough it starts to breakdown when exposed to oxygen. Because it was cooked, makes it toxic when left out long enough. However, unadulterated raw food with grow the bacteria, but will not be toxic, and that's the difference.

Hmmm, So the food that the bacteria is eating is to blame? The poop from that food that the bacteria eats that is. Well bacteria do release a lot of metabolic end products but mostly these are simple compounds like CO2. But if these bacteria use a fermentation process instead of respiration then they can produce lactic acid or alcohol for example. These bacteria are used in yogurt and beverage making.

The REAL nasty poop comes from their cell walls. It is part of the bacteria. And when the bacteria dies by rupturing or disintegrating then these natural cell-wall components are released into the host. The response from our immune systems can cause fever and aseptic shock leading to death. Below is a good explanation...


"What is Endotoxin?

Pyrogens are fever-causing agents. Endotoxin is a type of pyrogen and is a component of the exterior cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, like E. coli (see image). Endotoxin is a lipopolysaccharide or LPS. LPS consists of the lipid A portion containing fatty acids and disaccharide phosphates, core polysaccharides and the O-antigen (see image). The lipid A portion of LPS is the cause of the molecule’s endotoxin activity. While lipid A does not directly harm any tissue, the immune cells of humans and animals alike see it as an indicator for the presence of bacteria. Thus, these cells stimulate a response that is meant to fend off the unwelcome intruders. This reaction is entirely innate, i.e. no previous exposure to endotoxin is required. Furthermore, it may intriguingly serve in keeping our beneficial intestinal bacteria inside as much as in preventing major entrance of pathogenic bacteria from outside."



So it always comes down to what you want to believe when you read something like this. How do you know it's not this? Or that? Or something else? Thank goodness we still have the freedom to choose what we want to believe. Anyway, I must be off. I'm late for my flat earth society meeting at the local pub lol.

CausticSymmetry wrote:

Now, because of Stefan Lanka's work, it's very clear. Viruses are nothing more than the cytopathic effect of cells, or the reaction of being poisoned.

Then there's the experiences of Aajonus Vonderplantiz - Someone jokes in the comment section: "salmonella brain washing is strong with these doctors."



This video inspired thousands of people around the world to eat raw meat.

I think the key message that gets lost into physician indoctrination is that germs are the cycle of life. The idea that they cause disease is like saying that flies create garbage.

When food is cooked and left out long enough it starts to breakdown when exposed to oxygen. Because it was cooked, makes it toxic when left out long enough. However, unadulterated raw food with grow the bacteria, but will not be toxic, and that's the difference.

I read Aajonus' book and was inspired to get into raw animal products. Raw chicken is actually quite tasty marinated in lemon juice, ginger and honey.

But these days I mostly just take raw eggs. Now that is fast food And per the focus of this forum~great for hair!

Those doctors on the show, clearly so indoctrinated. I'm glad to hear a lot of people did listen and give this a try. But it seems like some, such as Mr Shaftless, will never
grok this. Hope I am wrong!

Read my lips, shaftless. It's all about the terrain!

Previously posted a video revealing that vaccinated places were not saving lives and the death rate increased in certain places, which begged the question, why?

I do not believe this claim. Even in the absence of a reliable media and information sources, it is adequate evidence just based on first-hand experiences of people losing relatives and the reduced occurrence of that as time progresses.

Bottom line here is that those that trust the system and quackcines are missing fundamental information
about human health.

Sickness equates to poor water quality, poor nutrition and environmental impacts.

But poor water quality, poor nutrition, and environmental toxins have been a constant for hundreds of years. How do you explain the sudden discrete trending increase in deaths.

It's what the bacteria are eating that makes all the difference.

Eating necrotic issue will cause the toxic excrement (the crap or bacterial endotoxin) emitted from the bacteria.

The same principles applies to washing our hands after using the toilet--no desire to accidentally ingest this stuff, as the gut bacteria in our own gut eating our toxic waste. However, exposure to open wounds or cuts is where real infection can happen.

So for example, we all have Escherichia coli, also known as E. coli in our gut, yet many people
think this is bad....the real difference is what they are eating. Escherichia coli infections really means they've got a load of toxins to be eaten. What gets the blame? Rarely the toxin.

Like shaftless said, this is not true. The endotoxin is in the cell wall, it is not bacterial waste. Seems far too simplistic to claim that all disease is caused by toxins and necrotic tissue.

What about the bubonic plague? They have identified the specific bacteria that causes it. And what about the accounts from the middle ages of towns and cities that isolated themselves from outside contact, and were not impacted at all?

Those doctors on the show, clearly so indoctrinated. I'm glad to hear a lot of people did listen and give this a try. But it seems like some, such as Mr Shaftless, will never
grok this. Hope I am wrong!

Read my lips, shaftless. It's all about the terrain!

Not a great attitude.

Actually wouldnt it be easy to prove or disprove this? Get some "clean" E. Coli or Salmonella that havent been feeding off of necrotic tissue or something toxic. Grow them in a petri dish with delicious agar to eat. These bacteria should be free of endotoxins. Then kill them and disintegrate them and collect their "body parts" and then inject it into healthy mice or monkeys that have an immune system similar to ours and see if the scrambled up dead (but clean) bacteria produces a deadly immune response. Simple, right? If the mice or monkeys dont respond negatively to it then that would be proof that germ theory doesnt work for them. I wonder if anyone has done this.


Also...."grok"???

The Microbes and the Terrain

Even to the "father of germ theory" it eventually became clear to Pasteur, in the course of time, when he recognized in his later years the validity of the research work of his contemporary and opponent Bêchamp and admitted that the organism at first gets ill and in succession, bacteria and viruses can proliferate. Finally, Pastuer admitted: “La bactérie n’est rien, le terrain c’est tout.” – “The microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything.” At the end of his life.

Only then he was convinced that microbes are only the indicator of disease, not at all the originators. Moreover, he (even as a non-homeopath) became aware of the phenomena of suppression: “If you think to destroy disease by merely suppression and killing bacteria then you can experience horrible wonders”.

If we revert back to virus theory, to my mind, it seems to be a big stretch to believe that a particle so small that only an electron microscope can render a black and white image of what is asserted to be a virus and even the CDC admit
that they cannot distinguish these images from exosomes and/or extracellular vesicles, yet can somehow hijack our cells, cause them to multiply and infect people and make them ill.

I starting looking into this claim around 2008, because had already observed so-called anti-viral substances work improving phase-2 liver detoxification. Remember, no one has ever isolated an virus from animal or human tissue.

Doesn't it seem odd that Vitamin C, selenium, NAC, and other are considered "anti-viral?" The mechanism is detoxification or getting rid of cellular garbage.

Given all the papers, claiming to have isolated a virus (all failed) it has already come to a point when anyone defending virology can only come up with unproven claims that are just as far fetched as flat earth claims IMO.