*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

Cell cultures cannot be used in virology because they are the source of:

1. Nucleic acids, proteins, lipids and other biomolecules described in CHEMISTRY of humans, animals, bacteria.
2. Exosomes, Multivesicular Bodies, Coated Vesicles and Other Common Particles Described in Biology of Humans, Animals, Bacteria.
3. Artifacts in the shape / size / appearance of various circles, lines whose formation is described with the help of PHYSICS, MATHEMATICS.

All virologists use cell cultures (of animal origin, human origin) as evidence of the existence of alleged "viruses". Just understand points 1 and 2.

I ask all scientists to seriously criticize the entire virology in the scientific sense, because virology abuses the natural sciences - chemistry, biology, physics, mathematics. Virology and virologists, in addition to deceiving themselves, ridicule the common sense of the whole world.

I ask all scientists, including virologists, to be clear: C0NV!D does not exist. Viruses do not exist.

DR. TOM COWAN & DR. ANDREW KAUFMAN - A RESPONSE TO DR. MERCOLA'S RECENT STATEMENT

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uGfhSqAu5sjy/

Data released in UK.

Office for National Statistics > less than 8000 deaths from 1 Feb 2020 to 31 Dec 2021 from C0V1D.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021

I forgot to post an update.
I'm completely healed as of last week. No lingering symptoms or whatsoever. Still haven't gone to the gym because it's been snowing all week and I can't take my car out so I'll proıbably go next week.

Live forever wrote:Data released in UK.

Office for National Statistics > less than 8000 deaths from 1 Feb 2020 to 31 Dec 2021 from C0V1D.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021

That's major info.
Sad thing is, it will never get through the head of a CNN junkie at this point. They'll think you are lying or an alt right conspiracy nutjob.

Quite a long time ago, well before the Internet. I started asking questions. Why was all the advice on TV, and even books just plain wrong?

When I was working at the clinic at that point well informed based on integrative perspectives, realized at that time that much of the advice even at the clinic, diet wise was already antiquated.

There was a point when you start to look for the sources of the information and discover that most of it is more political than scientific.

Now in regards to mainstream media and again before the Internet, I was made aware that major periodicals such as TIME Magazine and Newsweek and others were in cooperation with (not exactly sure who), but to continue a narrative. Was it CIA?  Maybe, really do not know.

That said is now "common knowledge" to at least alternative to mainstream that the CIA "tells" mainstream what is news.
Makes sense when you look back just a year or two or three ago and match up with what was true and not.

Here's the famous quote.

William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987 "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

Another point. People who are well traveled already know that perspectives around the globe differ based on what their media tells them. Often does not match up.

CausticSymmetry wrote:Quite a long time ago, well before the Internet. I started asking questions. Why was all the advice on TV, and even books just plain wrong?

When I was working at the clinic at that point well informed based on integrative perspectives, realized at that time that much of the advice even at the clinic, diet wise was already antiquated.

There was a point when you start to look for the sources of the information and discover that most of it is more political than scientific.

Now in regards to mainstream media and again before the Internet, I was made aware that major periodicals such as TIME Magazine and Newsweek and others were in cooperation with (not exactly sure who), but to continue a narrative. Was it CIA?  Maybe, really do not know.

That said is now "common knowledge" to at least alternative to mainstream that the CIA "tells" mainstream what is news.
Makes sense when you look back just a year or two or three ago and match up with what was true and not.

Here's the famous quote.

William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987 "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

Another point. People who are well traveled already know that perspectives around the globe differ based on what their media tells them. Often does not match up.

I've been wondering... is an outright lie much easier to control than a half truth? especially on such a scale as we have seen?

I notice assumptions like "there must be something to it" or "incompetence" - nobody seems to be able to question if a lie can be this big. (understandable)

Some quotes on this:

“But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and most important requirement for success.”
― Adolf Hitler

“The receptivity of the masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan.”
― Adolf Hitler

“Before mass leaders seize the power to fit reality to their lies, their propaganda is marked by its extreme contempt for facts as such, for in their opinion fact depends entirely on the power of man who can fabricate it.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

“It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.”
― Joseph Goebbels

More of these can be found here:

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/big-lie

Btw the narrative seems to be crumbling. What do you guys think/feel about the situation?

Nuada wrote:Btw the narrative seems to be crumbling. What do you guys think/feel about the situation?

Really hoping there will be momentum. I had heard that Canadian Prime minister Justin Trudeau plans on using
a tactic to fend off the Truckers to Ottawa. (Similar to the January 6th for the USA). Apparently Trudeau has spent lot of dollars to protesters to cause disruption and riots.

Reiner Fullmich has a video here below discussing "NO MERCY FOR THESE BASTARDS” REINER FÜLLMICH ANNOUNCES TRIALS IN EARLY FEBRUARY"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Uhppbee2LsEc/

Being that I'm in Commie-4-nia, a place that is surrounded by pharmaceutical, fake pandemic testing and makers of
some of the tech behind the vile poisons, a lot of people here are under the spell of fear. Apparently so scared they
do not even want to hear non-fear speak.

Bill Gates already talking about a new future pandemic. Did anyone remember him talking about pandemics years
before the CV event?  Makes you wonder, what does a guy who in the computer tech field know about viruses?

I think I've arrived at an insight on the why so many medical professionals have convinced themselves there is a pandemic and/or viruses.

Epidemiology and epidemiologists

Epidemiology is the study and analysis of the distribution, patterns and determinants of health and disease conditions in defined populations. - According to Wikipedia

Wikipedia placates to control, even the founder admits to this. Wikipedia definition goes on to say about
epidemiology...."It is a cornerstone of public health, and shapes policy decisions and evidence-based practice by identifying risk factors for disease and targets for preventive healthcare"

Skeptics of mainstream science, like myself are at odds with epidemiology, because it conveniently ignores
mechanistic, cause and effect, and just creates a correlation and causation (associated data), which is very easy
to project anyway "they" want it.

When it comes to Quackcine injuries, they will say "correlation is not causation" but when it comes to what is
causing illness, they will default to associations without mechanistic proof.

THE END OF VIROLOGY: THE 3RD PHASE OF CONTROL EXPERIMENTS FOR SARS-C0V-2

https://www.bitchute.com/video/LMZELPJVd4A7/

- You have to understand that observing under a microscope without isolation with biochemical characterization has no scientific meaning.  So you can't just watch the cytopathic effect
.  

Since virologists use bio-molecules in their experiments, this belongs to the domains of molecular biology and experimental biochemistry.  The methodology is clear: you have to isolate, purify and concentrate the bio-molecule.  You must first isolate it from the isolated, purified and concentrated alleged particles.  

- The use of cell cultures with mixtures of RNA from cows, monkeys, humans and bacteria is contrary to the mentioned methods of experimental biochemistry.  You cannot determine the uniqueness of the origin of RNA from this mixture.  I hope that you understand the meaninglessness of microscopy - without the obligatory "umbilical cord" for isolation and biochemical characterization (not possible in the case of cell cultures and VTM).

In the vast majority of cell cultures, featuring monkey kidney cells, they add bovine calf serum. It's already bad enough
that antibiotics are used to create the cytopathic effect (dying of cells) to 'prove viruses' yet adding bovine calf serum
makes it impossible to distinguish the RNA from a human lung lavage than a baby cow's.

That's when they sequence it. Without the computer program to piece it all together, according to Tom Cowan it would similar to dropping a 53 million puzzle piece assembly on the floor and putting it together, without a reference of the real picture to compare it to.

Plus we're not dealing with 100% RNA from beings.

C0V!D-19 VIROLOGY FRAUD EXPLAINED IN 19 MINUTES BY SPACEBUSTERS

https://www.bitchute.com/video/h6c7aLpsuyFu/

VIRUS AND MRNA THEORY Proven false (WITH SLIDES)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/M0BBux6xzAp2/

Much deeper down the rabbit hole, yet shattering to most biological science.
It means all the biology I've learned is primarily fiction.

It has been previously shown that the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi apparatus, the lysosomes, the nuclear Pores, and the cristae of the mitochondria could not exist in living cells.

Wait what?  This is not even close to being new information. This reveals the limitations
of electron microscopy.  

Artifacts arose during the preparation of tissue for electron microscopy and the conclusions have been the subject of much debate, so far there has been little challenge to the evidence which have adduced.

Listen to this podcast that explains it.

https://archive.org/details/01DrHaroldHillmanRawInterview

Details in print if reading is preferred:

http://pro-decizii-informate.ro/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Prof-Harold-Hillman-Artefacts-in-Electron-Microscopy-and-the-Consequences-for-Biological-and-Medical-Research-1980.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1eh3AOocMVECkmzeWAhoP_EChO5YGOiVSfkESa2LLDy4DqzQxbf1b4uVs

Could you weigh in on this, CS?


More evidence ‘Covid was tinkered with in a lab?’ ‘Scientists find “virus” contains tiny chunk of DNA that matches sequence patented by Moderna THREE YEARS before pandemic began’ – It was not ‘tinkered with’ in a lab it was created in a lab as a COMPUTER PROGRAM. It’s been made up not as a ‘virus’ but as a computer fiction

https://davidicke.com/2022/02/25/more-evidence-covid-was-tinkered-with-in-a-lab-scientists-find-virus-contains-tiny-chunk-of-dna-that-matches-sequence-patented-by-moderna-three-years-before-pandemic-began-it-was-not-ti/

Fresh suspicion that Covid may have been tinkered with in a lab emerged today after scientists found genetic material owned by Moderna in the virus’s spike protein.

They identified a tiny snippet of code that is identical to part of a gene patented by the vaccine maker three years before the pandemic.

It was discovered in SARS-CoV-2’s unique furin cleavage site, the part that makes it so good at infecting people and separates it from other coronaviruses.

The structure has been one of the focal points of debate about the virus’s origin, with some scientists claiming it could not have been acquired naturally.

The international team of researchers suggest the virus may have mutated to have a furin cleavage site during experiments on human cells in a lab.

They claim there is a one-in-three-trillion chance Moderna’s sequence randomly appeared through natural evolution.

But there is some debate about whether the match is as rare as the study claims, with other experts describing it as a ‘quirky’ coincidence rather than a ‘smoking gun’.

In the latest study, published in Frontiers in Virology, researchers compared Covid’s makeup to millions of sequenced proteins on an online database.

The virus is made up of 30,000 letters of genetic code that carry the information it needs to spread, known as nucleotides.

Based on information all around, at least from where I sit. It appears that this begins all the way in the early 1990's
when Ralph S. Baric produced a "virus soup" to induce acute rabbit 'coronavirus' infection results in "virus-induced" myocarditis and congestive heart failure.

Needless to say for those who understand the "viral isolation" preparation is the toxic part, as virus themselves do not exist.

They attempted to figure out the cause of Dilated Cardiomyopathy, thinking it was a virus.
Most of the evidence linking viral myocarditis to Dilated Cardiomyopathy has
been obtained from retrospective serologic studies in humans, the identification of enteroviral RNA sequences
in patients with myocarditis and Dilated Cardiomyopathy and animal
studies.

All of this is surrogate research, never direct evidence, based on flawed models. An FYI, antibodies which is
a serologic test is also bogus.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7109931/pdf/166-5-978.pdf

It would appear that some of this "soup" that induces myocarditis is part of the new Quackines.

The alleged lab leak probably never occurred as was, a plan B in case the initial narrative cracked.

"Mortality and course of RbCV infection. Seventy-nine
New Zealand White rabbits were inoculated with 0.2 mL ofa
103-104 RIDso/mL stock of RbCV. Consistent with earlier
studies [17, 18], animals died at 2-12 days, with an overall
mortality of --60%. Twenty-four (30%) died in the acute
phase with enlarged hearts, right ventricular dilation, pleural
effusion, and pulmonary edema. Twenty-four (30%) died in
the subacute phase with various degrees of pleural effusion"

www.TheViralDelusion.com

https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/

New "Anti-Virus" film coming later in March.

It’s been a year in the making. The docu-series exposing the psuedo-science behind the pandemic and the madness of virology is finally ready. Here’s the first poster for the series…Hope you guys like it! Coming out online March 21st…

CausticSymmetry wrote:www.TheViralDelusion.com

https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/

New "Anti-Virus" film coming later in March.

It’s been a year in the making. The docu-series exposing the psuedo-science behind the pandemic and the madness of virology is finally ready. Here’s the first poster for the series…Hope you guys like it! Coming out online March 21st…

I hope to God people start paying attention!!

I'm tired of being so outnumbered by the deluded ones.

It's going to be an uphill battle selling the logic behind this series...especially if there is no confrontational showdown between a virologist believer and one of these guys. What the general public remember most are news reports of exhausted plastic-covered medical staff, ventilated patients and many many deaths. Besides, I don't think a lot of people still have the same interest in this p(l)andemic since vaccine mandates like passports and masks are gradually being dropped globally.

That is...until a new potentially dangerous variant comes along lol

Yes, there's been scarce amount of debate.

For example, there was this attempt to 'debunk' viruses do not exist.

https://amos37.com/mercola-yes-sars-cov-2-is-real-virus/

I was underwhelmed by this futile attempt to debunk, and coming from Mercola's website of all places.
However Mercola has often been dead wrong on a lot of things. Mercola's Achilles' heel is that he largely
depends on other 'expert' opinions to shape his views, and the person he used was unconvincing.

I made a PDF file that outlines the nonsense, however this link below does it justice.

Dr. Kaufman and Tom Cowan made a video response to the above:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uGfhSqAu5sjy/

Then there was a very difficult to watch "debate" if you could call it that.
Dr. Wodarg, admits not being a "lab guy" well that's the entire basis of the debate. Dr. Wodarg
relies on hearsay 'evidence' the same kind of rubbish we've all heard repetitively. If we simply trace
back to the original sources, the evidence is sorely lacking. Moreover, the so-called evidence acts to
disprove the 'science.'

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JbRXd21diYlM/

Now finally something more interesting:

Part 2: TERRAIN THE FILM

https://www.bitchute.com/video/S9TxMHS0MK5N/

I thought Part 1: of Terrain the film was a bit of a sleeper, but part 2 does a better job
at hitting on some of the points, plus it's more entertaining to watch.

CS, I'd be interested to see your pdf outlining the Mercola nonsense.

Delphine wrote:

CS, I'd be interested to see your pdf outlining the Mercola nonsense.

It's not a direct refutation, however it does refute most points. I wrote it based on
a request from someone who wanted to get a simple understanding that viruses
do not exist. Feel free to spread the PDF. My name is not on it--only care for the information
to get out.

https://www.transfernow.net/dl/20220303d8OWnzSI/og0QISW6

It's only up for 7-days, but will be happy to uploaded it again if needed.

CausticSymmetry wrote:

Delphine wrote:

CS, I'd be interested to see your pdf outlining the Mercola nonsense.

It's not a direct refutation, however it does refute most points. I wrote it based on
a request from someone who wanted to get a simple understanding that viruses
do not exist. Feel free to spread the PDF. My name is not on it--only care for the information
to get out.

https://www.transfernow.net/dl/20220303d8OWnzSI/og0QISW6

It's only up for 7-days, but will be happy to uploaded it again if needed.

That site is giving me problems downloading.  I guess not possible to just post the pdf  yourself?

btw I agree Terrain part 1 was kind of boring. I'd like to watch part 2, need captioning (hearing impaired). that's the
problem with alt video sites, none of them offer closed captions as youtube does. Sucks.

Virus Myth PDF

https://ufile.io/ty8d3ndz

THE TRUTH ABOUT VIRUSES - DR. SAM BAILEY

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UuBNy2OctrzU/