Experimental aftermath.

Are You Suffering From A Medical "Coincidence"?

https://rumble.com/v24xl98-suffering-a-medical-coincidence.html

I was talking to a friend who knows an undertaker who says he's never seen so much blood clots when they drain the blood from the body. Strange. Vaccines maybe? Then again, I read that the covid virus can also cause blood clots from the inflammation it creates in the body. That sounds believable too. Inflammation, even tho it's purpose is supposed to fight against infection, can do more harm than good sometimes...especially when it instigates the clotting mechanism.

"Inflammation initiates clotting, decreases the activity of natural anticoagulant mechanisms and impairs the fibrinolytic system. Inflammatory cytokines are the major mediators involved in coagulation activation."

shaftless wrote:I was talking to a friend who knows an undertaker who says he's never seen so much blood clots when they drain the blood from the body. Strange. Vaccines maybe? Then again, I read that the covid virus can also cause blood clots from the inflammation it creates in the body. That sounds believable too. Inflammation, even tho it's purpose is supposed to fight against infection, can do more harm than good sometimes...especially when it instigates the clotting mechanism.

"Inflammation initiates clotting, decreases the activity of natural anticoagulant mechanisms and impairs the fibrinolytic system. Inflammatory cytokines are the major mediators involved in coagulation activation."

Early on in the scam_demic, saw a few interviews with both undertakers and pathologists. The jabbinated were the ones who had the bizarre clots, in particular, lengths and forms they have never before seen in their careers.

As to the \/irus, well there is no scientific evidence of any kind that proves their existence.

I'll list all the mechanisms of 'proof' that isn't actual science validation of proof.

Most of the time, the 'proof' provided is either assembly of uploaded sequencing, meaning that a computer assembles or
puts together contigs (puzzle pieces).

In next-generation sequencing, a contig is a contiguous sequence of DNA that is assembled from overlapping reads. Contigs are used to represent the consensus sequence of a genome or transcriptome, and are often the starting point for further assembly into scaffolds or chromosomes. They are also used to identify and annotate genetic features such as genes and regulatory regions.

These "puzzle" pieces, for which there are 54 million of them are used to assemble via a computer to approximate what the non-existent, fake virus sequence is.

A lot of people just assume that everything in this publication is based on science: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642146/

spoiler alert, it's not.

Then there's electron microscope. Those black and white images are rendered in a way that would surprise most people.

Before we get to the, "point and declare it's a virus" while electron micrographs of other images look identical to exosomes and/or extracellular vesicles, to obtain the image under electron microscopes, various processes these samples need to undergo, render the image to be radically different from original shape, because of dehydration, shrinking and metallic staining artifacts.

Sample Preparation: Preparing a sample for EM imaging can be a complex and time-consuming process. This includes fixation, embedding, sectioning, and staining, which can all affect the final image quality. Additionally, some samples, such as biological samples, are sensitive to the harsh conditions required for EM imaging and can be damaged or distorted during preparation.

Then, there's specimen damage: Electrons can cause damage to the sample, either by heating the sample or by causing chemical reactions. This can be especially problematic for delicate samples, such as living cells.

Imaging at room temperature: Electron microscopy is typically performed at very low temperatures, typically around -180C. Therefore, it is not possible to image living samples.

So far, there are 50 different publications where the attempt to prove contagion have failed.

Of course, the wet lab procedures have been discussed a lot on another thread, that being negative controls
which were published by Stefan Lanka prove that the cytopathic effect (dying of cells) is not attributed to an
alleged virus, but the toxic nature of the experiment additives to the cell culture.

Then it is often asked, how could "they" have created a \/accine, such as before the C0NV!D version if no virus
exists?

The short answer: The \/accine was developed before the ability to 'grow' a virus was "figured out."

It was the 1954 publication by John Enders, a 'groundbreaking paper' in which they described the successful cultivation of poliovirus in non-neuronal cells. This was thought to be a significant achievement because previous attempts to grow the virus had only been successful in nerve cells, which made it difficult to obtain large quantities of the virus for use in vaccine development.

Then there is the question about, how about animal experiments, when they inject viral cell cultures (merely dying cells from toxic additives) and the animals get sick?  The animals do not exhibit typical symptoms of the same illness, instead they suffer from the toxic effects of the cell culture additives, which are a mixture of animal blood serums, anti-fungal, and antibiotics, which are toxic to the animal cell culture.

Another question sometime asked, how do "they" create antivirals if no viruses exist?

Answer: Estimation of a viral infection is based on surrogate markers, such as reactive oxygen species (free-radicals), which are happening constantly in the human body. Many supplements used for hair loss, have some neutralizing effects on reactive oxygen species.

Then there's viral load, and it's measured by way of either Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), Branched DNA (bDNA) assay: This is a method that uses fluorescently labeled probes to bind to viral RNA or DNA, and then quantified by counting the fluorescence signals, or Antigen-capture ELISA: This method uses antibodies that are specific to a particular virus to capture viral antigens in a sample, and then quantified by measuring the amount of captured antigen.

In all cases, it doesn't prove they found anything. it's all based on presumption. Teachers tell students...no one questions it....and if they do...grant money has a way of vanishing.

[/quote]

Agreed, the more stuff and chemicals they use in detecting viruses can make things iffy. But there is what appears to be a quite simple procedure that they use to grow bacteriophages. They take a petri dish with an E. Coli bacterial "lawn" growing happily on it. Then they introduce the phage. Slowly the phages infiltrate the e. coli and kill them off making what appears to be clear spots in the lawn. I don't think they add any toxins since that too can kill the bacteria lawn. So if all they add is a possible virus then what is happening?



Figure 6.17. (a) Flasks like this may be used to culture human or animal cells for viral culturing. (b) These plates contain bacteriophage T4 grown on an Escherichia coli lawn. Clear plaques are visible where host bacterial cells have been lysed. Viral titres increase on the plates to the left. (credit a: modification of work by National Institutes of Health; credit b: modification of work by American Society for Microbiology)

Why India did not allow Pfizer’s C0NV!D Quackcine

https://thedailyguardian.com/why-india-did-not-allow-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine/

Here in the great white north...

95,000,000 vaccine shots
53,000 adverse reactions
10,000 serious reactions
400 deaths

These are low numbers they say compared to the risk of getting extremely sick and dying from covid...especially if you are 60 and older. Ummm, not buying it. Covid is supposedly much milder now so I think I'll just take my chances and keep hiding under my rock lol.

shaftless wrote:Here in the great white north...

95,000,000 vaccine shots
53,000 adverse reactions
10,000 serious reactions
400 deaths

These are low numbers they say compared to the risk of getting extremely sick and dying from covid...especially if you are 60 and older. Ummm, not buying it. Covid is supposedly much milder now so I think I'll just take my chances and keep hiding under my rock lol.

My understanding is the risk of death is 800:1 per clot shot. So based on 95 million, deaths should be 118,750.
That said, "official numbers" have been manipulated to the extreme (edited).

There's still plenty of fall out before the mainstream is informed we've all been through our equivalent to the 1940's genocidal experiments, except it was on a near global scale.

People in the no virus camp, such as myself have a few theories. Some believe the DOD (Department of Defense) used chemical sprays to induce illness, as there is/was no pathogen/virus.

Some suggest there were cone shell toxins, similar to snake venom put into things.

Others, such as myself believe the only toxin introduced on top of what "they" whoever, "they" are put into anything was
the jab itself, plus all the toxic hospital protocols, and incentives to create more deaths (Remdesivir), placed on ventilators, which has always killed people for decades in the 80 to 90% range.

Prior to 2021, deaths were below average, it was only after the jab came out when there was any notable death rates.

There are some people out there that suggest that the jabs were engineered in part by regressive's to control the population by making a MAC address on all the jabbinated, to sync them up into a control grid. Apparently, there is an App on Android devices that can tell you who is jabbed, because it will bring up a MAC address when in proximity.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/death-rate

U.S. Death Rate 1950-2023

Quackine roll-out, big boost in deaths and VAERS is only reported 1% of the time.

C0NV!D Quackcines were designed to kill billions of people - Pharma Exec testifies - 25-year pharmaceutical industry veteran-turned-investigator who says the Department of Defense (DoD) had “very clear intent to harm” by executing a “mass genocide of Americans.”

Under the DoD’s control and direction, drug manufacturers like Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen started mass-producing the shots for Operation Warp Speed – long before the first cases of “C0NV!D” even appeared, it turns out. These “figurehead” organizations, Latypova insists, were just obeying the DoD’s orders.

What this means is the United States military oversaw the creation and rollout of these “C0NV!D countermeasures,” as they were classified before being erroneously dubbed as “Quackcines.” This is why they called it Operation Warp Speed: because it was a military warfare operation, not a “public health” operation.

The Centers for Disease Creation and Propaganda (CDC) and the Fraud & Death Administration (FDA) also played their role by fast-tracking emergency use authorization (EUA) for the deadly drugs, followed by official approval for some of them – and the rest is history.

The crux of Latypova’s presentation claims that the DoD, Big Pharma, and Big Regulation (the FDA and CDC) conspired with one another “to commit mass murder through bioterrorism and informational warfare operations worldwide.”

“The evidence is overwhelming that there is an intent to harm people by the C0NV!D-injections, so-called \/accines,’ and other nonsensical C0NV!D response measures implemented in lockstep by governments all over the world,” she said.

https://www.ghanaweb.com/region/albynewsghana/COVID-19-vaccines-were-designed-to-kill-billions-of-people-Pharma-Exec-testifies-46643

https://sagehana.substack.com/p/sasha-latypova-so-this-is-a-us-military

Shocking FOIA Documents Reveal the C0NV!D Scam-Demic Was a DoD Operation

https://rumble.com/v24zqoi-shocking-foia-documents-reveal-the-covid-pandemic-was-a-dod-operation-datin.html

another odd story

Chickens and Eggs?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzeQJVlFGoc


https://duckduckgo.com/?q=eggs+covid&atb=v333-1&ia=web

TheOne wrote:another odd story

Chickens and Eggs?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzeQJVlFGoc


https://duckduckgo.com/?q=eggs+covid&atb=v333-1&ia=web

Farmers confirmed the feed is contaminated.

So these covid spike protein antibodies are not found normally in the egg yolks, right? The chickens have to be superimmunized against covid first and then they start producing the antibodies in their eggs.

Kinda like how they make snake anti-venom in the lab. They inject horses with snake venom and let the horse's immune system go to work and start making antibodies against the venom. Then they harvest the horses blood serum with the antibodies. Only this time they are using chickens for covid. Nothing too unusual there.

I don't see any plot by big pharma to destroy all the chicken farms so that there won't be any eggs as a way to put a stop to the research. And even if all the chicken farms burned to the ground you could always import chicken eggs from other countries and continue your experiments.

shaftless wrote:So these covid spike protein antibodies are not found normally in the egg yolks, right? The chickens have to be superimmunized against covid first and then they start producing the antibodies in their eggs.

Kinda like how they make snake anti-venom in the lab. They inject horses with snake venom and let the horse's immune system go to work and start making antibodies against the venom. Then they harvest the horses blood serum with the antibodies. Only this time they are using chickens for covid. Nothing too unusual there.

I don't see any plot by big pharma to destroy all the chicken farms so that there won't be any eggs as a way to put a stop to the research. And even if all the chicken farms burned to the ground you could always import chicken eggs from other countries and continue your experiments.

Hopefully the reasons for poisoning the feed will be discovered....so to go out on a limb here, there is that certain group who fancy the idea of reducing the population down to 500 million.

Quotes from The book, Committee of 300 by ~ Dr. John Coleman

"Let us talk about actual case histories, the attempt to communize and deindustrialize
Italy. The Committee of 300 long ago decreed that there shall be a smaller--much
smaller--and better world, that is, their idea of what constitutes a better world. the
myriads of useless eaters consuming scarce natural resources were to be culled. Industrial
progress supports population growth"

"Cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, and by means of starvation
and diseases in Third World countries, the death of 3 billion people by the year 2000,
people they call "useless eaters." The Committee of 300 commissioned Cyrus Vance to
write a paper on this subject of how best to bring about such genocide. The paper was
produced under the title the "Global 2000 Report" and was accepted and approved for
action by President Carter, for and on behalf of the U.S. Government, and accepted by
Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of State. Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the
population of the United States is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050."

PDF Link to the free book

Then again....



He owns a lot of farmland

Saw this on a facebook post from a friend. I'm trying to figure this one out regarding these covid times but having no luck. PCR methods for cloning have been around for years but now this lady says they are doing this behind our backs and altering our genome and ultimately our species....or something like that. Kinda brings back fond memories of those bitchcute videos during the height of the pandemic.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pv5MInbudwHP/?fbclid=IwAR0-PTUSVO54Zz7omwNlAUhB3-bhbZGpwpEIHiGvq_ffVHIf6TgaVk-UKP0

shaftless wrote:Saw this on a facebook post from a friend. I'm trying to figure this one out regarding these covid times but having no luck. PCR methods for cloning have been around for years but now this lady says they are doing this behind our backs and altering our genome and ultimately our species....or something like that. Kinda brings back fond memories of those bitchcute videos during the height of the pandemic.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pv5MInbudwHP/?fbclid=IwAR0-PTUSVO54Zz7omwNlAUhB3-bhbZGpwpEIHiGvq_ffVHIf6TgaVk-UKP0

It just gets even more Orwellian all the time.

Recently, it was stated by an insider that some of those babies with all black eyes are grey alien hybrids from the shots.

This presentation reminded me of the film, Splice:



Also in the + section, they listed this great video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xKvQf7lsTYRY/

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-paper-an-estimated-13-million?r=o7iqo

An estimated 13 million people worldwide killed by the COVID vaccines

PFIZER: “WE DID NOT DEFRAUD THE GOVERNMENT, WE DELIVERED THE FRAUD THAT THE GOVERNMENT ORDERED.”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/LXteOAHoQoNe/

"Vx ... they kill you slowly over time"

Alex Jones predicted pandemics & forced vaccines over 20 years ago.

https://twitter.com/TheRightMelissa/status/1626754587037208578?t=CigsfP4xesyN9gcBtCn-1g&s=03

I think mass killage will come from china and russia acting as a team in their quests to take over ukraine and taiwan and probably some more countries ta boot rather than waiting for a slow death from vaccines. We are on the path to WW3.

I don't know about the States but Toronto seems to be experiencing rather odd behaviour from people lately. There's a lot of random attacks on city folk from strangers. Pushing people onto subway tracks, slashings, stabbings...just out of the blue with no apparent motive. Someone violently pushed an old lady down on a sidewalk and she actually died from her injuries. How tragic is that? And they didn't even steal her purse or anything. Absolutely no reason. Either the virus, the prolonged lockdowns or the vaccines made people go bonkers.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, Feb 22, 2023

Positive Correlation between the Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality
Editorial by Gary S. Goldman, PhD
OMNS (Feb 22, 2023) There exists a heated controversy as to whether C0NV!D Quackcines and associated boosters are truly "safe and effective." Health care providers and regulators recommend C0NV!D Quackcines  to all individuals, despite differences in risk factors of serious disease among various age groups. Even those who have contracted CONV!D (it's a construct) and have recovered from the disease (they mean the flu) via natural immunity are strongly encouraged to be vaccinated. Various laws and mandates have been drafted that require C0NV!D Quackcines of employees. Senate Bill (SB) 866, introduced on the Senate floor on May 12, 2022, was initially drafted to allow children as young as 12-years of age to make their own medical decisions, including the administration of an FDA approved C0NV!D Quackcines , without the knowledge or consent of their parents and have their medical records sealed. This measure was subsequently amended, but then moved to an inactive file.

According to Dr. E. G. Bailey, a bioinformatics course instructor and her students, vaccine hesitancy "has intensified due to the rapid development and distribution of the C0NV!D Quackcines " They voice concern regarding "anti-vaccine information" being shared on social media, and appear to target for retraction a 2011 peer-reviewed study published in the journal Human and Experimental Toxicology that I coauthored with Neil Miller. In this paper, we reported a counterintuitive correlation demonstrating that among the most highly developed nations, those that require the most vaccines for their infants tend to have the worst infant mortality rates (IMRs) [1]. Bailey and nine coauthors uploaded a preprint manuscript [2] that reports, "it is troublesome that this [the Miller and Goldman] manuscript is in the top 5% of all research outputs since its publication, being shared extensively on social media with tens of thousands of likes and re-shares (see https://acs.altmetric.com/details/406556)."

If all vaccines were truly "safe and effective," would not everyone be actively seeking to be vaccinated to gain protection against "vaccine preventable" diseases? Interestingly, many individuals assigned the label "anti-vaccine" initially manifested a "pro-vaccine" mindset. It was only after one or more of their own children experienced an adverse vaccine reaction, or they learned of an adverse reaction from friends, that their perception of vaccines changed. It is not just the lay public that has become skeptical of claims that vaccines have a positive risk-to-benefit ratio. A diverse range of medical professionals and researchers challenge that paradigm as exemplified by Seneff et al. [3] and other emerging peer-reviewed studies that specifically question the-benefit of C0NV!D Quackcines and subsequent boosters compared to protection afforded by natural immunity. After a 30-year career, the recent resignation of Dr. Philip R. Krause, former FDA Deputy Chief for Vaccines, likely speaks to his integrity of supporting vaccine safety and estranging himself from an agency whose decision-making has become captured by the pharmaceutical industry and increasing conflicts of interests.

The Bailey manuscript (Nysetvold et al. [2]), is methodologically flawed by its use of data from both highly developed and Third World nations that have the tendency to attenuate the strength of the correlation between number of vaccine doses and IMR. Their failure to account for differences in nations' vaccination rates and diversity (heterogeneity) of socio-economic factors, likely explains why they were only able to report a statistically significant positive correlation (r = 0.16, p < .03) that is very weak relative to the stronger correlation, r = 0.70 (p < .0001), reported by Miller and Goldman [1]. Miler and Goldman avoided introducing many confounders by performing linear regression analysis using data from the US (which specified the most vaccine doses of any nation) and the 29 nations with better IMRs than the US. These nations inherently reported high vaccination rates (exceeding 90%) and displayed homogeneity of socio-economic factors.

Once the critics achieved a "negligible" association, it is likely that outcome reporting biases influenced them to pursue other investigations that they considered as further evidence in support of the "safety and effectiveness" of vaccines [4]. For example, in their analysis of IMR versus percentage vaccination rates for each of 8 vaccines, they report inverse correlations (e.g., as the percentage vaccination rate increases, IMR improves) for 7 vaccines. However, close inspection of the scatter plot reveals that vaccines are not necessary for low IMR (some countries with low IMR have lower dose schedules) nor are they sufficient (some countries with high dose schedules have very high IMR) [5]. Moreover, the methodology used by the critics ignore the possibility of synergistic effects of combinations of vaccines.

The methodology, results, and conclusions of several analyses that were performed by these critics are critically reviewed in a recent peer-reviewed publication by Goldman and Miller [5] which includes three new analyses (e.g., odds ratio, sensitivity analysis, and 2019 replication) that affirm the positive correlation (of their original study) (Table 1). An odds ratio analysis performed by an independent statistician, Dr. Walter Schumm, split the nations at the median for IMR and for the total number of vaccine doses. Three of eleven control variables that were investigated (i.e., child poverty rate, pertussis vaccination rate, and teenage fertility rate) were statistically significant. None of these variables lowered the correlation below 0.62, thus robustly confirming the original findings [5]. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the original study of 30 top nations could have been expanded to sixteen additional nations with IMRs worse than the US (for a total of 46 nations) and the linear regression analysis of IMR and number of vaccine doses would have remained statistically significant. The Miller and Goldman 2011 study using 2009 data was replicated using 2019 data. Linear regression analysis based on the US (which now ranked 44th based on IMR and continued to specify the most vaccine doses of any nation) and the 43 nations with improved IMRs, corroborated the positive correlation between number of vaccine doses and IMR.

Table 1. Multiple analyses by Goldman and Miller affirm a positive correlation between number of vaccine doses and infant mortality rates

Table 1: Vaccine doses and infant mortality rates

There is credible evidence and biological plausibility for an association between pediatric vaccines and infant deaths. Of the 2605 infant deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 1990 through 2019, 58% clustered within three days post-vaccination, and 78% occurred within seven days post-vaccination, confirming that infant deaths tend to occur in temporal proximity to vaccine administration [6]. The excess of deaths during these early post-vaccination periods was statistically significant (p < 0.00001). This study, and studies by Aaby et al. [7-9] (who discovered that vaccines have non-specific effects that can increase or decrease mortality from infectious diseases not targeted by the vaccine), provide additional evidence for an association between increased vaccine doses and higher rates of infant mortality.

Vaccine-related morbidity and mortality are more extensive than publicly acknowledged. In Third World nations, numerous studies indicate that DTP and inactivated polio (IPV) vaccines have an inverse safety profile, especially when administered out of sequence [8,9]. Multiple vaccines administered concurrently have also been shown to increase mortality. In all nations, a causal relationship between vaccines and sudden infant deaths is rarely acknowledged. Yet, physiological studies have provided biological plausibility by showing that infant vaccines can produce fever and inhibit the activity of 5-HT neurons in the medulla, causing prolonged apneas and interfering with auto-resuscitation [6].

Vaccines are not always safe and effective. This outcome may be partially due to the US granting pharmaceutical companies immunity from litigation arising from adverse vaccine reactions.

Miller and Goldman conclude their recently published 2023 study [5] by reaffirming the main finding in their original 2011 study:

There is a positive correlation between infant vaccines and infant mortality rates. This relationship is most pronounced in analyses of the most highly developed homogenous nations but is attenuated in background noise in analyses of nations with heterogeneous socioeconomic variables. Health authorities in all nations have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving desired goals. More investigations into the health outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations and the effect of vaccinations on all-cause mortality are imperative.

(Gary S. Goldman holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science and served as Editor-in-Chief of the journal Medical Veritas. He has authored or coauthored 18 medical journal articles indexed in Pubmed, and is an unpaid advisor to the non-profit Physicians for Informed Consent https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/ . The views presented in this article are the author's and not necessarily those of all members of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Editorial Review Board.)


References
1. Miller NZ, Goldman GS. Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? Human & Expl Toxicol 2011 May 4;30(9):1420-28. doi:10.1177/0960327111407644 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0960327111407644

2. Nysetvold E, Mika T , Elison W , Garrett D, Hunt J , Tsuchiya I , Brugger SW , Davis MF, Payne SH, Bailey EG. Infant vaccination does not predict increased infant mortality rate: correcting past information [PREPRINT]. medRxiv 2021.09.03.21263082; doi: 10.1101/2021.09.03.21263082 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.03.21263082v4

3. Seneff S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: the role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food Chem Toxicol 2022 Jun; 164:113008. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/

4. Goldman GS. Examples of outcome reporting bias in vaccine studies: Illustrating how perpetuating medical consensus can impede progress in public health. Cureus 20200 Sep 21; 14(9): e29399. doi:10.7759/cureus.29399 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36304385/

5. Goldman GS, Miller NZ. Affirming a positive correlation between number of vaccine doses and infant mortality rates: A response to critics. Cureus 2022 Feb 2; 15(2): e34566. doi:10.7759/cureus.34566 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36751569/

6. Miller NZ. Vaccines and sudden infant death: an analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature. Toxicol Rep 2021 Jun 24; 8:1324-35. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.020. eCollection 2021 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34258234/

7. Aaby P, Ravn H, Benn CS, Rodrigues A, Samb B, Ibrahim SA, Libman MD, Whittle HC. Randomized trials comparing inactivated vaccine after medium- or high-titer measles vaccine with standard titer measles vaccine after inactivated vaccine: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016 Nov; 35(11):1232-41. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001300 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27753769/

8. Aaby P, Benn C, Nielsen J, Lisse IM, Rodrigues A, Ravn H. Testing the hypothesis that diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine has negative non-specific and sex-differential effects on child survival in high-mortality countries. BMJ Open 2012 May 22;2(3):e000707 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000707 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22619263/

9. Mogensen SW, Andersen A, Rodrigues A, Benn CS, Aaby P. The introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and oral polio vaccine among young infants in an urban African community: a natural experiment. EBioMedicine. 2017;17:192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.041 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28188123/


Nutritional Medicine is Orthomolecular Medicine
Orthomolecular medicine uses safe, effective nutritional therapy to fight illness. For more information: http://www.orthomolecular.org

DR REINER FUELLMICH THEY ARE BROKE! NOW GET THE JAB.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/16wVWTQk47dj/

ED DOWD ON ALL THE UNEXPLAINED DEATHS

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZAEsdKZgB66k/