*The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*

shaftless wrote:You'd think that there would be something consistent that tells these scientists that a virus is the cause. Something that stands out from the random menagerie of other possible elements like pesticides, waste products etc. In North America, where there is so much of everything in the soil, water and air, it may be hard to hone in on a lone suspect.

But in the enormous deserts of Saudi Arabia....far from the maddening (and polluted) crowds....something is making camels sick. They suspect it to be a virus too. Wouldn't that be easier to find since all there is there, is pristine sand baking under the hot sun?

The playbook is usually the same. Eastern Equine Encephalitis is probably caused by a neurotoxin. A similar example would be the Organophosphates, like parathion, are indeed highly toxic.

They "work" by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme crucial for nerve function, leading to symptoms such as dizziness, tremors, anxiety, and confusion.

This disruption in the nervous system is why phosphorus is used in nerve agents.

Phosphorus-based agricultural products have a long history. Initially, bones were used as a source of phosphorus for fertilizers. Over time, methods evolved to extract phosphorus from rocks, making it more accessible for agricultural use.

Blaming diseases on viruses just diverts attention from the real problem.

There's simply no real science on any levels that validates virus transmission, It's a complete construct based on unscientific methodologies.

Dr. Thomas Powell was said to have performed the most extensive experiments disproving germs causing disease in the late 1800s. He described his experiments in a newspaper published in 1896, & detailed them in his 1909 book "Fundamentals and Requirements of Health and Disease."

1. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH18971121.2.200&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN--------

2. https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsrequ00powe/page/519/mode/1up

Some criticize Dr. Powell's experiments, saying they were not taken seriously. While information is sparse, Dr. Powell did convince investors of his work, & raised funds for his own sanitorium.

1. https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-san-francisco-call-and-post-dr-thom/4831481/

2. https://www.newspapers.com/article/los-angeles-herald-dr-thomas-powell-s/4831433/

3. http://newspapers.library.in.gov/?a=d&d=PLPL18961217.2.51

Dr. Powell was head of the facility starting in 1904. It was known as the Powell Sanitorium, and it was located at 313 W 3rd St. Los Angeles, CA. It was later renamed the Los Angeles Sanitarium.

1. https://books.google.com/books?id=-u05AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA69&lpg=PA69&dq=dr.+thomas+powell+los+angeles+sanitarium&source=bl&ots=6dRRwFEQdp&sig=ACfU3U2cc_blMIBMKQuTmUJabBVfkQxa_g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi7zuPy8JuHAxWzkokEHTmyCuo4FBDoAXoECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=dr.%20thomas%20powell%20los%20angeles%20sanitarium&f=false

2. https://books.google.com/books?id=KxQ2AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA272&lpg=PA272&dq=thomas+powell+sanatorium+for+stomach+and+kidney+disease+polks+medical+register&source=bl&ots=9zP3d2dxis&sig=ACfU3U2VKTJIvHkY4UC5VfMVZ6KutOP1WA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjKy42pz5yHAxUpkYkEHf5rD0MQ6AF6BAgbEAI#v=onepage&q=thomas%20powell%20sanatorium%20for%20stomach%20and%20kidney%20disease%20polks%20medical%20register&f=false

3. https://homesteadmuseum.blog/2016/07/19/museum-director-musings-women-at-work-in-the-los-angeles-sanitarium-ca-1905/

Dr. Powell did not run the facility for long as he passed away suddenly on August 18th, 1916 at the age of 78. Regardless, it is clear that Dr. Powell and his experiments were taken seriously, and he did run a successful sanitorium until he died.

https://books.google.com/books?id=4WIcAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA424&lpg=PA424&dq=dr.+thomas+powell++los+angeles+sanitarium&source=bl&ots=NRk-HVF5Bq&sig=ACfU3U0l09YkKCtWil7yVK7uOOXdTKncWA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiyud62gJyHAxXEv4kEHTo_D1s4MhDoAXoECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=dr.%20thomas%20powell%20%20los%20angeles%20sanitarium&f=false

Bursting The Germ Theory Bubble

https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/bursting-the-germ-theory-bubble

Why are problems with terrain so hard to determine? If something other than genetics is causing a low immunity you'd think it would be caught early. Some kind of toxin maybe. Or a defect in an organ or tissues. You'd think that would stand out like a sore thumb after careful observation thru x-rays and blood tests.

Its also a bit of a mystery that their first son also had the disease which killed him at 7 months. But their sister was fine. What would cause only males to be affected? Especially if their environment probably would've been fairly consistent during the birth of all 3 children.


An outside question....

Dr Sam doesn't seem to believe that nature would "make a mistake" under normal conditions. And she's right about outside influences being able to affect genetic patterns.

But I was wondering about the relatively common condition of dwarfism. Dwarfism seems to affect just the shape and size of an individual. They are mentally fit and internally sound and can live a long and prosperous life. And its been around for millennia. Long before toxins became a household word.

Yet we consider it a genetic "mistake" of sorts. Is it a mistake? Or just a rare - but normal - variation of genes. Something like albinism (except for the visual impairment thing).

shaftless wrote:Why are problems with terrain so hard to determine? If something other than genetics is causing a low immunity you'd think it would be caught early. Some kind of toxin maybe. Or a defect in an organ or tissues. You'd think that would stand out like a sore thumb after careful observation thru x-rays and blood tests.

Its also a bit of a mystery that their first son also had the disease which killed him at 7 months. But their sister was fine. What would cause only males to be affected? Especially if their environment probably would've been fairly consistent during the birth of all 3 children.


An outside question....

Dr Sam doesn't seem to believe that nature would "make a mistake" under normal conditions. And she's right about outside influences being able to affect genetic patterns.

But I was wondering about the relatively common condition of dwarfism. Dwarfism seems to affect just the shape and size of an individual. They are mentally fit and internally sound and can live a long and prosperous life. And its been around for millennia. Long before toxins became a household word.

Yet we consider it a genetic "mistake" of sorts. Is it a mistake? Or just a rare - but normal - variation of genes. Something like albinism (except for the visual impairment thing).

I have been skeptic of germ and virus theory a good 20 years before Sam Bailey and some of her colleagues, as there have been others before my time who figured out something was wrong in the State of Denmark.

Males shortly after birth are far more susceptible to \/accines as they have higher androgen levels, which can amplify toxicity at least 3-fold. This is why more boys have brain-damage (as in autism or other 'neuro-diversity' issues than girls.  

The 'problem' is that most of society has been drinking the "Kool-Aid" of unproven concepts our entire lives.

These unproven concepts include genetic predisposition, birth defects being congenital as in determined by genes, instead of environmental conditions during gestation, such as nutrition, toxicity, UVB, (toxins include \/accines, antibiotics and other poisons commonly administered).

Remember that when it comes to medical practices, these are not vetted based on efficacy, it is based on the ability to generate revenue.

Mainstream medicine oddly enough prides itself on ignorance and conflates cause and effect on a regular basis and relies on unproven $cience to 'validate' its claims.

So, for the last several decades and beyond, 'established $cience' is anything but proven. These are all invalidated claims that the lay public believes in, because they just buy into narratives that are unproven.

Here's a few common examples. Doctors are baffled on both SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), this situation has been 'mysteriously" prevalent since infants have been receiving 'inoculations' immediately after birth.

Before the time these 'inoculations' were introduced, SIDS has virtually non-existent. Children graves before that time were extraordinarily rare.

Now days it's SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome), another 'baffling' incident in which adults are dying suddenly without 'known' causes.

Another common incident that's been happening especially since the late 80's is when they ramped up the Quackcine schedule, so this causes issues with gut health, as these toxins via needle destroy gut barrier integrity. When a fever occurs following these 'life saving' poisons, the experts recommend a poison to "help" which is Tylenol, (Acetaminophen and/or paracetamol).....There is plenty of evidence, yet the medical cartel does know this is how revenue is generated via 'treatments' to mask symptoms of the issues their initial 'treatments' caused.

The "fever-reducing" toxins impair the body's self-cleaning (take out the garbage processes), as in Glutathione that normally binds to toxins, so this effectively "lowers the body's defenses against toxins, allowing a full assault.

When real deep side-effects happen, these are brushed aside and 'treatments' are recommended, never acknowledging the real cause.

In a nutshell, nearly everyone who performs research on this level, does not practice the scientific method, which involves analytical chemistry. If the public understood this, they would not embrace non-scientists who assume they are practicing real science.

There's more politics in medicine than in public office.

Due to the corruption of science in medicine, there are presently very few people who have any incentive or the funds to dive into the real causes. Here's just one basic example of a common situation that will cause significant health issues.....deleting natural microbes that are normally transferred from mother to child at birth.....This occurs via antibiotics and/or Caesarean section. A loss of a signal microbe can prevent the body from generating nutrients and taking out the garbage.

Simply put, "Everything’s fine today, that is our illusion. ... Voltaire quote "It is hard to free fools from the chains they revere".

Embracing mythology because "everyone's heard the narrative via textbooks (which are wrong) and popular culture.

Here's a book that will provide anyone would some curiosity about this subject a place to start.

https://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/David%20Parker%2C%20Dawn%20Lester%20-%20What%20Really%20Makes%20You%20Ill%3F%20-%20%20Why%20Everything%20You%20Thought%20You%20Knew%20About%20Disease%20Is%20Wrong.pdf

Unmasking the Viral Paradigm

https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/unmasking-the-viral-paradigm

Science, Pseudoscience, and The Germ Theory of Disease - Dr- Jordan Grant, MD

https://www.bitchute.com/video/0mi3kMMA0FJF

Unmasking the Viral Paradigm - Part Two

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Unmasking-the-Viral-Paradigm-Part-Two:c

He does seem to have interesting views on personal relationships with others and how we see ourselves. He would make a good psychologist.

Seems that a lot of Australians are religious too lol. He keeps slipping in "God" and "The Universe" in his talks. Not sure why he does that when discussing the validity of proper scientific procedure lol. Subtly contradictory in a way  

I wish there was more than just claims about fraudulent science. They have to bring it to light in a dramatic way somehow. That would open a lot of eyes.