Increased blood flow to the scalp bad!

if hairloss is caused by fibrosis and inflammation etc than increasing blood flow will just make hairloss worse right?

Is there much point increasing blood flow if fibrosis, inflammation havent yet been taken care of?

Also if you look where the scalps capillarys enter the scalp (on the temples, behind the ears and the eye brow area) than could this cause head aches in these areas from the blood getting blocked.

The capillarys are alot smaller in the mpb area even for people without hairloss so im thinking maybe increased blood flow will cause head aches. (expecially on the temples as this is where most the capillarys enter the scalp.

Remove fibrosis, inflammation and possibly calcium deposits and all the hairloss products aimed at increased blood flow to the scalp would bring really good growth right?

cuebreeze - Aging is lack of oxygen transport within cells. Blood flow is just one measure and fibrosis and inflammation are involved with hypoxia (lack of oxygen).

Better blood flow is better. Over the years I've heard a lot of theories tossed around about blood flow being a possible negative for hair loss, however it goes against the very diseases that exacerbate hair loss.

As far as calcification, this topic frequently gets over simplified. I should point out that is many diseases or conditions that involve poor regulation of calcium, which include calcium deposits, bacteria and heavy metal also follow calcium deposition.

Poor tissue oxygenation, inflammation, calcification, bacteria and heavy metals, free-radicals. Based on other disease models, these are key factors in this process.

Well I can testify that using a backswing/swingboard 5-10minutes a day has contributed with my overall regimen in halting my hair loss. Doing oscillations gets the lymphatic system moving and also just plain hanging upside down helps somewhat.