Gene Therapy for Aging Reversal and Hair Regrowth

I was wondering if anyone knows anything about gene therapy and can it potentially one day be used for aging reversal and hair loss?

MikeGore wrote:I was wondering if anyone knows anything about gene therapy and can it potentially one day be used for aging reversal and hair loss?

To summarize, extremely doubtful.

Even if genes caused disease, which they do not, the industry of health is more interested
in treatments, not cures.

On the relevant topic here - Here's a link to a place that ordinary would be a waste of time.

https://www.americanhairloss.org/hair_loss_research/gene_therapy.html

With all the "anti-virus" talk in the last 2 years here, can use their last 3 paragraphs as an example.

"The most common altered gene-delivery method involves using crippled viruses to insert desired genes into the target cells. Outside of the laboratory, viruses are tiny organisms that infect cells by replacing some of the cell's DNA with virus DNA. After infection by a virus, a cell begin to make the proteins the virus DNA tells it to make, causing the expression of various diseases. Scientists use the virus infection mechanism to deliver desirable DNA.

First, they cripple the virus DNA so that it cannot reproduce or cause harmful effects, but is still able to insert new DNA into target cells. The desired genes are spliced onto to the virus DNA, and the viruses insert the new DNA into the target cells. The viruses can be injected directly to the location where the stem cells are, or the stem cells may be cultured in a laboratory, altered by viruses containing the new DNA, and then the altered stem cells can be placed back into the organism.

There are many areas of gene therapy that need refinement. Identifying genes, determining exactly how to change them to code for the desired proteins, avoiding an immune response when the viruses are injected directly into the organism, getting an adequate quantity of target cells to take up the altered DNA regardless of how it is delivered, and getting the cells to express the characteristics coded by the altered genes, once the new DNA is inserted, all need more work. But forward progress is being made."

Viruses do not exist, so when various sites write about 'virus engineering' what they are really talking about is exosomes.

For right now, the closest thing we've got to a therapy that comes close is exosome with stem cells.

You actually brought up what I was thinking. Gene therapy makes use of the "viruses" to slice the DNA and do its thing. But if viruses don't really exist, how does gene therapy even work?

Since a virus is really an exosome, can an exosome actually achieve the same results they are talking about? That is replicating and modifying the DNA as they say?

Is it simply a matter of concept, i.e. changing the word used but the end result is still the same?

ELECTRON MICROSCOPY EXPERT & SCIENTIST DR. ROBERT YOUNG DEMOLISHES "VIRUS" MICROGRAPHS

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ErttQnihecCT/

Video above breaks down what exosomes are (why viruses are not anything) and why "they" got it wrong.

With regard to oncolytic viruses, these are exosomes that are used as a co-treatment in cancer.

The exosomes have apoptotic bodies, or properties that may aid in tumor shrinkage.