Oh no, not my fave the "Health Ranger".

In the post on his Natural News blog, Mike Adams also writes that ” it is the moral right — and even the obligation — of human beings everywhere to actively plan and carry out the killing of those engaged in heinous crimes against humanity.”

Wtf? He's talking about killing scientists and employees who think GMO's are safe?

http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/07/25/mike-adams-claims-monsanto-set-up-kill-gmo-supporters-website-as-scientists-journalists-face-death-threats/

Mike Adams is a Dangerous Loon

Let me summarize Adams’ points here: Monsanto is equivalent to modern day Nazis committing their own genocide and bid for domination. Anyone who defends GMOs (or just doesn’t buy into anti-GMO nonsense) is a “Monsanto collaborator” and are just as bad as Nazi collaborators. He says directly, “These attacks all have one thing in common: they are orchestrated by paid biotech muckrakers — people I call ‘Monsanto collaborators.’”

These people should be named, their addresses and photos made public. And by the way, it is your moral right, even responsibility, to kill them.
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/mike-adams-is-a-dangerous-loon/

MIKE ADAMS BUILDS A NATURALNEWS NAZI TIME MACHINE:
http://www.twipscience.org/news/2014/7/25/mike-adams-builds-a-naturalnews-nazi-time-machine

That bold, on the cutting edge of science supplement billionaire is going down in flames. . .

no story is black and white. tnx for providing contrast in the direction this forum mainly not about.

Listen Odysseus ,you have too much female energy inside a male body.
And that is no good.
That makes you swear about things.
That makes girls instinctivly run away from you even if you are more than good.

Visit this sub -reddit to cure your relationships,lost male energy due to society pedestalising pussy,
and consequent stress from relastionships...

With a red pill mindset you are free from this world(you can fuck and ignore most women you like)
and you can go on with your life.7

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/

Golden_Flower wrote:Listen Odysseus ,you have too much female energy inside a male body.
...
With a red pill mindset you are free from this world(you can fuck and ignore most women you like)
and you can go on with your life.

Take your preaching about sexist movements, meditation and light energy somewhere else goldenflower, your soo full of shit its laughable

hairyshowers wrote:

Golden_Flower wrote:Listen Odysseus ,you have too much female energy inside a male body.
...
With a red pill mindset you are free from this world(you can fuck and ignore most women you like)
and you can go on with your life.

Take your preaching about sexist movements, meditation and light energy somewhere else goldenflower, your soo full of shit its laughable

Correct.

hairy, "Golden_Flower" is panoslydios again.  

Golden_Flower wrote:Listen Odysseus ,you have too much female energy inside a male body.
And that is no good.
That makes you swear about things.
That makes girls instinctivly run away from you even if you are more than good.

Visit this sub -reddit to cure your relationships,lost male energy due to society pedestalising pussy,
and consequent stress from relastionships...

With a red pill mindset you are free from this world(you can fuck and ignore most women you like)
and you can go on with your life.7

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/

I'm so on this!!!!! Thank you flower of goldenness!

Beebrox wrote:no story is black and white. tnx for providing contrast in the direction this forum mainly not about.

I'm sorry, but some stories are simply factual, especially when they've been documented word for word. There is no middle ground for rallying the crazies to "kill scientists and GMO proponents". That's insane. And it is fun to watch Health Ranger boy frantically backtracking, trying to amend what he said. Skeptic blogs are all over him, general media journalism will be next. Pull up a chair, boys, this will be a blast!

I agree with you about this forum: it IS the antithesis of what Adams, Mercola, Food Babe and all the rest of the hucksters represent.

I am sorry, i didnt talk about the story which may be factual or not, but about Mike Adams in general. He's right on many aspects in contrast for what ever he said/have done ''wrong''...

I would not call skeptic blogs and media representative worth reading / investigating in order to get closer to the truth... Sometimes people forget that we live in the world where gravity is still not well explained as well as how action potential forms in the brain, how electrodynamics works, etc - plenty potential paradigm shifts regardless of the field of science. In medicine, theories is what's all about. Pushing percents on one side or the other is where many manupulations can be made concerning scientific research. I call it soft science, but yet - what counts are results, and effectiveness of the methods being used - also long term. In spite of the last sentence i am far from being on your boat, Odysseus.

Misinformation can be worse than no information at all, there is plenty of wrong ideas presented as facts by internet gurus smarting out on skeptic blogs and sites...This forum is many things. It's about the people and their ideas...Some people here are really great.

He implied . . . no he stated, that scientists and people who support GMO's should be killed.

How can you twist that around? I don't give a shit about what he's "done", besides become a billionaire selling supplements. Hell, anybody can sell a freaking supplement.

No, you're not on my boat, or even in the same harbor. Crazy, dangerous statements are unforgivable from a the owner of a site with as much traffic as health ranger boy gets. People might actually believe his bat shit crazy philosophy and act upon it.

Odysseus - The research is clear, GMO's are loaded with pesticides that disrupt CYP450 enzymes (liver detox enzymes).

There's a reason why people are sick. Sicker than the generation before the introduction of this questionable food.

What I want to know is, why would ANYONE support GMO's? Think about it...Seriously, why would you?

GMO's have been proven to cause cancer and other health related problems. They're terrible for the environment. The normal organic food we have always had is just fine, and ISN'T stripped of nutritional value like these terminator-animal-gene-monster-cancer-pesticide seeds. GMO's are about control. How in good conscience could you support something like that? That's what I want to know...

Well I am on the fence about the "Health Ranger" ....read some damning stuff about him, but I can't believe everything I read or hear. Skeptic blogs are just close minded people who believe everything that is being fed by the mainstream news and media, their minds are worthless. But I found this interesting article on Redeye....about people just sitting there and doing nothing, even called out Eckhart Toll.

http://redicecreations.com/article.php?id=31098

The New Age Tactical Spiritual Military Industrial Complex supports murder and genocide. What is happening in Gaza today will eventually take place in London, Dublin, New York, Lisbon, Barcelona, Oslo, Glasgow, Melbourne, Stockholm, Auckland and Cape Town and wherever you are reading this article. Notice is being served upon all humanity. Not just the people of the Gaza strip. The hunt is on and we are all the prey of NATO and the Globalists. The main tactic for keeping us easy targets in the West right now is the New Age Tactical Spiritual Military Industrial Complex.

I really don't understand why normally reasonable people feel motivated to attack the credibility of people like the Health Ranger or Dr. Mercola or others, who in my opinion have a lot to offer. The medical industrial complex sees them as a threat, which this good.....why? The mass graves are filled by the medical industrial complex, whereas the Health Ranger just informs people, a threat to profits.

CausticSymmetry wrote:I really don't understand why normally reasonable people feel motivated to attack the credibility of people like the Health Ranger or Dr. Mercola or others, who in my opinion have a lot to offer. The medical industrial complex sees them as a threat, which this good.....why?  The mass graves are filled by the medical industrial complex, whereas the Health Ranger just informs people, a threat to profits.

Because he's saying that it's a moral obligation to kill people who have no problems with GMO's? This is a "lot to offer"?

hiilikeyourbeard wrote:What I want to know is, why would ANYONE support GMO's? Think about it...Seriously, why would you?

GMO's have been proven to cause cancer and other health related problems. They're terrible for the environment. The normal organic food we have always had is just fine, and ISN'T stripped of nutritional value like these terminator-animal-gene-monster-cancer-pesticide seeds. GMO's are about control. How in good conscience could you support something like that? That's what I want to know...

Show me citations that GMO's cause cancer.
Show me citations that organic food is more nutritious than GMO's.
Do you have any idea what "terminator" seeds are?

Odysseus wrote:

hiilikeyourbeard wrote:What I want to know is, why would ANYONE support GMO's? Think about it...Seriously, why would you?

GMO's have been proven to cause cancer and other health related problems. They're terrible for the environment. The normal organic food we have always had is just fine, and ISN'T stripped of nutritional value like these terminator-animal-gene-monster-cancer-pesticide seeds. GMO's are about control. How in good conscience could you support something like that? That's what I want to know...

Show me citations that GMO's cause cancer.
Show me citations that organic food is more nutritious than GMO's.
Do you have any idea what "terminator" seeds are?

There is but one cure.
That is being in balance with the natural laws.Period.

Remove all GMO vegetables.
Remove all wheat/gmo wheat.
All gmo corn/soy...

So you wanna citations.

Take this.




Original Video - More videos at TinyPic

Seralini claims there’s a double standard, and gives good evidence thereof.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691514002002

Here’s a link to the Monsanto abstract of the same study (Also – Monsanto tends to NOT use isogenic lines as controls, and may in fact use feed contaminated with GMO's.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691504000547

The same study was done by Monsanto 8 years prior, and published in the same journal. The only difference was that was for 9 months and Séralini’s was for 2 years. No paper has been retracted for being “inconclusive” before.

FBI is now on the case of "Health Ranger".

Odysseus wrote:

FBI is now on the case of "Health Ranger".

Spraying toxic herbicide into food, which is especially heavy in GMO crops is a form of poisoning. As always, the government pursues those against its clients.

In other words, Monsanto has the entire congress in their back pocket.

When the government gets involved it's usually for the wrong reasons.

This is why the EPA really stands for the Environment Pollution Agency, protecting its clients by allowing toxic levels of pollution.

The constant ridicule, marginalization of pro-health people is to protect industry. It's the same "rationale" for attacking the raw milk industry or attacking the natural supplement industry, meanwhile hundreds of thousands die from prescribed drugs.

This is all about money.

It's also the same reason why those bankers are not in prison, while a large number of regular people lost their savings/mortgages, etc. This is in stark contrast to what happened in Iceland, where the bankers actually were jailed.

Since when does the government do the right thing anymore?

Odysseus wrote:

hiilikeyourbeard wrote:What I want to know is, why would ANYONE support GMO's? Think about it...Seriously, why would you?

GMO's have been proven to cause cancer and other health related problems. They're terrible for the environment. The normal organic food we have always had is just fine, and ISN'T stripped of nutritional value like these terminator-animal-gene-monster-cancer-pesticide seeds. GMO's are about control. How in good conscience could you support something like that? That's what I want to know...

Show me citations that GMO's cause cancer.
Show me citations that organic food is more nutritious than GMO's.
Do you have any idea what "terminator" seeds are?

http://www.motherearthnews.com/natural-health/gmo-safety-zmgz13amzsto.aspx

http://enhs.umn.edu/current/5103/gm/harmful.html

You are so clueless it is actually kind of incredible. This info is EVERYWHERE.

Also, guess what human studies have been done? NONE. Pushing this on us is actually the human trials, without our consent. But you must think your government loves you

Grab some popcorn (organic, of course), pull up a seat and watch the show. Mikey's pulling all sorts of shenanigans to cover his tracks, several sites have archived the original tirade.

hiilikeyourbeard wrote:
You are so clueless it is actually kind of incredible. This info is EVERYWHERE.

Also, guess what human studies have been done? NONE. Pushing this on us is actually the human trials, without our consent. But you must think your government loves you

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2013/10/14/2000-reasons-why-gmos-are-safe-to-eat-and-environmentally-sustainable/?&_suid=140659258939109950142458546907

The claim that genetically engineered crops are ‘understudied’—the meme represented in the quotes highlighted above—has become a staple of opponents of crop biotechnology, especially activist journalists. Anti-GMO campaigners, including many organic supporters, assert time and again that genetically modified crops have not been safety tested or that the research done to date on the health or environmental impact of GMOs has “all” been done by the companies that produce the seeds. Therefore, they claim, consumers are taking a ‘leap of faith’ in concluding that they face no harm from consuming foods made with genetically modified ingredients.

That is false.

Every major international science body in the world has reviewed multiple independent studies—in some cases numbering in the hundreds—in coming to the consensus conclusion that GMO crops are as safe or safer than conventional or organic foods. But until now, the magnitude of the research on crop biotechnology has never been cataloged. In response to what they believed was an information gap, a team of Italian scientists summarized 1783 studies about the safety and environmental impacts of GMO foods—a staggering number.

The researchers couldn’t find a single credible example demonstrating that GM foods pose any harm to humans or animals. “The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of genetically engineered crops,” the scientists concluded.

From a page cited by "beard".

"Although no allergic reactions to GM food by consumers have been confirmed"


"Although these effects have not been observed in GM plants"

"A genetically modified plant could theoretically have lower nutritional quality than its traditional counterpart by making nutrients unavailable or indigestible to humans."

"It is not clear what sort of risk the possibility of conferring antibiotic resistance to bacteria presents."

http://enhs.umn.edu/current/5103/gm/harmful.html

Odysseus wrote:From a page cited by "beard".

"Although no allergic reactions to GM food by consumers have been confirmed"


"Although these effects have not been observed in GM plants"

"A genetically modified plant could theoretically have lower nutritional quality than its traditional counterpart by making nutrients unavailable or indigestible to humans."

"It is not clear what sort of risk the possibility of conferring antibiotic resistance to bacteria presents."

http://enhs.umn.edu/current/5103/gm/harmful.html

Odysseus - I wish what you believed were true, but I have proof that at least in my mind cannot be refuted.

For one thing, when I get people off of GMO's who have recalcitrant food allergies, ulcerative colitis, etc...something "magical" happens, they get better.

There's another problem, our 'regulatory authorities' who are regulated by the very industries they are supposed to be regulated, have not been very open about POE-15.

Adjuvants of the POE-15 family (polyethoxylated tallowamine) have now been revealed as actively toxic to human cells. POE-15 a compound that is not always listed on the label. Modern methods were applied at the cellular level (on three human cell lines), and mass spectrometry (studies on the nature of molecules). This allowed the researchers to identify and analyse the effects of these compounds.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300483X12003459

http://www.tufts.edu/~skrimsky/PDF/Glypho-Gate.PDF