Search
Check Out Our Sponsors
Latest topics
OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
+31
stanis
blackjack
Live forever
102
Keanoseg
iuyyighghghgkh
rayl
Organism
liverock
masterofnone
rofl
DeadlyDevice
yup
ngb
hiilikeyourbeard
scottyc33
AS54
crincrin
Odysseus
Colum
Espio
lamka
bobthebuilder
NYJets
Delphine
Zaphod
whodathunkit
4039
CausticSymmetry
angstman
35 posters
Page 21 of 40
Page 21 of 40 • 1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 30 ... 40
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Delphine wrote:Yes, it's frustrating when you attempt to educate people on this, and there's so much flak in the form of spin doctoring, it's nearly impossible.
I would really like my son to understand this, especially for the sake of any grandkids I may have.
Yes, vitamin C works in any infectious disease. Any disease, period.
Was just checking this out. Excellent, well-researched book:
http://www.amazon.com/Immunization-Reality-Edition-Revised-Updated/product-reviews/089789359X/ref=cm_cr_pr_hist_5?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addFiveStar&showViewpoints=0&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending
Thanks I may pick this up.
I just got this in and need to make the time to read it.
http://www.amazon.com/Dissolving-Illusions-Disease-Vaccines-Forgotten/dp/1480216895/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1411408259&sr=8-1&keywords=dr+suzanne+humphries
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Scientists are the most skeptical group of people in the world, and you can rest assured that a paper confirming the safety or efficacy of a given vaccine passes through the same skeptical process as a paper refuting the safety or efficacy of a given vaccine. Thus, when a consensus emerges, it implies that a vast majority of the experts bent on disagreeing with one another have looked at the various data, and all come to the same conclusion.
That said, if you can show me an example of research that has 1) been conducted under reasonable experimental conditions, 2) passed peer-review, and 3) demonstrates that the risks associated with vaccination outweigh the benefits, I will immediately change my position, and you'll never hear me defend my current position again. Until such time, I'm going to have to agree with every major scientific organization in the world, and support the widespread use of vaccination in the prevention of disease.
That said, if you can show me an example of research that has 1) been conducted under reasonable experimental conditions, 2) passed peer-review, and 3) demonstrates that the risks associated with vaccination outweigh the benefits, I will immediately change my position, and you'll never hear me defend my current position again. Until such time, I'm going to have to agree with every major scientific organization in the world, and support the widespread use of vaccination in the prevention of disease.
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus wrote:Scientists are the most skeptical group of people in the world, and you can rest assured that a paper confirming the safety or efficacy of a given vaccine passes through the same skeptical process as a paper refuting the safety or efficacy of a given vaccine. Thus, when a consensus emerges, it implies that a vast majority of the experts bent on disagreeing with one another have looked at the various data, and all come to the same conclusion.
That said, if you can show me an example of research that has 1) been conducted under reasonable experimental conditions, 2) passed peer-review, and 3) demonstrates that the risks associated with vaccination outweigh the benefits, I will immediately change my position, and you'll never hear me defend my current position again. Until such time, I'm going to have to agree with every major scientific organization in the world, and support the widespread use of vaccination in the prevention of disease.
That's kind of the point. Government agencies say there are NO risks and parents shouldn't have any choice. As a parent you should be able to delay and spread out vaccines if you choose. There is absolutely no reason for most babies to get a Hepatitis vaccine before they leave the hospital. They recommend this because it would politically incorrect to make babies in the ghetto who are going to go live in a crack house get it but not the rich mom from Beverly Hills.
Want the spread out the MMR vaccine into 3 different shots? Nope, can't do it. The CDC knows that a lot of parents in the ghetto won't follow a spread out, delayed schedule so they cram as many shots as they can into as few appointments as possible. Good, attentive parents would bring their child in for more appointments.
The more educated a person is the less likely they are to follow the CDC schedule. I know of doctors in very wealthy areas (Santa Monica, San Francisco) who don't recommend the CDC schedule and have their own recommendations. They keep quiet about it and just tell their patients that were referred to them so they don't cause an uproar. Not all doctors agree with the CDC recommendations. Jenny McCarthy gets hammered but she came to her conclusions after talking to doctors. She's isn't even anti-vaccine, she's for safer and fewer vaccines.
Let me ask you a question Odysseus. If vaccines are safe then why no poke a newborn with all of them as soon as they are born? They poke them with the Hep vaccine so why not just load them up with all of the others? Could it be that is unsafe? Could it be that some children can handle the MMR vaccine at age 1 while others can't? I mean, seriously, the CDC recommends the MMR vaccine at age 1 so obviously it's not that necessary. If it were a baby would get it before they leave the hospital.
ngb- Posts : 479
Join date : 2013-02-05
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/why.htm
Hey CDC, vaccines aren't immunizations.
Every time a story about kids not being vaccinated comes up parents whine about how that is putting their child in danger. Why? If your child was vaccinated you have nothing to worry about, right?
Hey CDC, vaccines aren't immunizations.
Every time a story about kids not being vaccinated comes up parents whine about how that is putting their child in danger. Why? If your child was vaccinated you have nothing to worry about, right?
ngb- Posts : 479
Join date : 2013-02-05
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
ngb wrote:
The more educated a person is the less likely they are to follow the CDC schedule. I know of doctors in very wealthy areas (Santa Monica, San Francisco) who don't recommend the CDC schedule and have their own recommendations. They keep quiet about it and just tell their patients that were referred to them so they don't cause an uproar. Not all doctors agree with the CDC recommendations. Jenny McCarthy gets hammered but she came to her conclusions after talking to doctors. She's isn't even anti-vaccine, she's for safer and fewer vaccines.
L.A.’s affluent anti-vaxxers may be behind city’s whooping cough epidemic
The story discusses the entitlement among Hollywood’s elite that’s endangering their children’s health:
Many irked local pediatricians, however, describe a parent profile defined by ignorance that’s sheathed in arrogance. They say these misguided guardians are seduced by anecdotes about “vaccine-damaged children” and are prone to confirmation bias (the impulse to favor information that affirms pre-existing beliefs). In addition, assert some doctors, these parents tend to believe hours accrued researching on the Internet and engaging in urgent conversations within their social circle give them the authority to debate the legitimacy of immunization with their child’s health care provider.
“It’s a sense of entitlement and it comes out of a customer mentality since they are often choosing their doctor and paying cash,” says Dr. Nina Shapiro, the director of pediatric otolaryngology (ear, nose and throat conditions) at UCLA’s Geffen School of Medicine and a vocal critic of anti-vaccine sentiment.
http://medcitynews.com/2014/09/l-s-affluent-anti-vaxxers-may-behind-citys-whooping-cough-epidemic/
Privileged Antivaxxers:
Antivaccine rhetoric, for example, includes that notion that the current vaccine schedule is “too many too soon,” and that the tiny bodies of infants are being overwhelmed with too many antigens. However, the antigens in the vaccine schedule has actually decreased over the years (as the vaccines have become more targeted), and the number of antigens children face on a daily basis from the environment vastly outnumber the few additional antigens in vaccines.http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/privileged-antivaxxers/#more-33538
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus wrote:Scientists are the most skeptical group of people in the world, and you can rest assured that a paper confirming the safety or efficacy of a given vaccine passes through the same skeptical process as a paper refuting the safety or efficacy of a given vaccine. Thus, when a consensus emerges, it implies that a vast majority of the experts bent on disagreeing with one another have looked at the various data, and all come to the same conclusion.
That said, if you can show me an example of research that has 1) been conducted under reasonable experimental conditions, 2) passed peer-review, and 3) demonstrates that the risks associated with vaccination outweigh the benefits, I will immediately change my position, and you'll never hear me defend my current position again. Until such time, I'm going to have to agree with every major scientific organization in the world, and support the widespread use of vaccination in the prevention of disease.
It's the complete opposite. They have never demonstrated vaccines to show safety and efficacy with credible research.
However, toxicity is already undeniable. Mercury in any form is one of the most toxic substances in the world. Injecting it is absurd. The same goes with aluminium.
Then there's mycoplasma, viruses from animal and human embryo cells. Plus other chemicals which are known to cause harm when injected.
So, why even think or consider a vaccine when vitamin C will treat or prevent it in the first place?
Then there's the trace mineral selenium, which prevent viral replication. This has been in the research literature for decades. The same with vitamin C.
The *only* reason it is ignored is there's no money in it for those who stand to profit in the billions with vaccines.
Shouldn't it raise an eyebrow that the CDC invests 4 billion into the vaccine industry every year?
The fox watches the hen house. The FDA is loaded with vaccine interests, as is the CDC.
This is fraud on every level. How can anyone buy into it without being a shill? Is it conditioning?
_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen
(Primary site under construction: )
Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
Primary site under construction:
https://immortalhair.org/
Archived as of 2022 here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220330061828/https://www.immortalhair.org/
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus, thanks for not answering my questions.
I'll try again.
Why not inject a baby with every vaccine as soon as they are born? They only inject the Hepatitis vaccine. Why?
I'll try again.
Why not inject a baby with every vaccine as soon as they are born? They only inject the Hepatitis vaccine. Why?
ngb- Posts : 479
Join date : 2013-02-05
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
ngb wrote:Odysseus, thanks for not answering my questions.
I'll try again.
Why not inject a baby with every vaccine as soon as they are born? They only inject the Hepatitis vaccine. Why?
Try asking the right questions:
http://www.vaccines.gov/who_and_when/pregnant/
Before becoming pregnant, you should be up-to-date on routine adult vaccines. This will help protect you and your child. Generally speaking, live vaccines should not be given within a month before conception, while inactivated (killed) vaccines may be given at any time before or during pregnancy, if needed. It is best to talk to your healthcare provider about vaccinations before you become pregnant.
Can u provide a citation to back up your question/
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/11/10/vaccination-during-pregnancy.aspx
_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen
(Primary site under construction: )
Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
Primary site under construction:
https://immortalhair.org/
Archived as of 2022 here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220330061828/https://www.immortalhair.org/
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus wrote:ngb wrote:Odysseus, thanks for not answering my questions.
I'll try again.
Why not inject a baby with every vaccine as soon as they are born? They only inject the Hepatitis vaccine. Why?
Try asking the right questions:
http://www.vaccines.gov/who_and_when/pregnant/
Before becoming pregnant, you should be up-to-date on routine adult vaccines. This will help protect you and your child. Generally speaking, live vaccines should not be given within a month before conception, while inactivated (killed) vaccines may be given at any time before or during pregnancy, if needed. It is best to talk to your healthcare provider about vaccinations before you become pregnant.
Can u provide a citation to back up your question/
Citation to back up a question? I'm asking you for an answer. Why not inject a child with all of the vaccines right after they are born? Why wait a year for the MMR vaccine? If you can't answer this simple question maybe that says something about your lack of knowledge about this topic.
ngb- Posts : 479
Join date : 2013-02-05
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
ngb wrote:Odysseus wrote:ngb wrote:Odysseus, thanks for not answering my questions.
I'll try again.
Why not inject a baby with every vaccine as soon as they are born? They only inject the Hepatitis vaccine. Why?
Try asking the right questions:
http://www.vaccines.gov/who_and_when/pregnant/
Before becoming pregnant, you should be up-to-date on routine adult vaccines. This will help protect you and your child. Generally speaking, live vaccines should not be given within a month before conception, while inactivated (killed) vaccines may be given at any time before or during pregnancy, if needed. It is best to talk to your healthcare provider about vaccinations before you become pregnant.
Can u provide a citation to back up your question/
Citation to back up a question? I'm asking you for an answer. Why not inject a child with all of the vaccines right after they are born? Why wait a year for the MMR vaccine? If you can't answer this simple question maybe that says something about your lack of knowledge about this topic.
Dude, Odysseus is a payed shill..we all know that.
hiilikeyourbeard- Posts : 656
Join date : 2013-10-24
Age : 37
Location : montana, usa
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
I don't know why babies aren't vaccinated with all vaccines right away. I would imagine there's a lot going on, like child birth. They receive them before leaving the hospital. I just don't understand your point?
And please address the outbreak of whooping cough in the more affluent areas of California, where the vaccinations rates have dropped dramatically.
Paid shill. That's right. Shilling for big Pharma bought me a gorgeous swimming pool, it'll also buy me that yacht I've been drooling over.
And please address the outbreak of whooping cough in the more affluent areas of California, where the vaccinations rates have dropped dramatically.
Paid shill. That's right. Shilling for big Pharma bought me a gorgeous swimming pool, it'll also buy me that yacht I've been drooling over.
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Andrew Wakefield loses again in court; what happened?
http://violentmetaphors.com/2014/09/20/andrew-wakefield-loses-again-in-court-what-happened/
http://violentmetaphors.com/2014/09/20/andrew-wakefield-loses-again-in-court-what-happened/
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus wrote:I don't know why babies aren't vaccinated with all vaccines right away. I would imagine there's a lot going on, like child birth. They receive them before leaving the hospital. I just don't understand your point?
And please address the outbreak of whooping cough in the more affluent areas of California, where the vaccinations rates have dropped dramatically.
Paid shill. That's right. Shilling for big Pharma bought me a gorgeous swimming pool, it'll also buy me that yacht I've been drooling over.
Have you ever looked at the CDC schedule? The only vaccine a baby receives before leaving the hospital is HepB. The others are months later. MMR is 1 year later. A 9 month old can't get measles, mumps or rubella? Why do you think that a baby gets HepB right away but waits for the others?
ngb- Posts : 479
Join date : 2013-02-05
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus wrote:Andrew Wakefield loses again in court; what happened?
http://violentmetaphors.com/2014/09/20/andrew-wakefield-loses-again-in-court-what-happened/
One of the top from the CDC apologizing to Wakefield.
http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/Whistlblower%20apology%20to%20Wakefield.htm
Oh...and if these vaccines are safe, explain why over 2 billion dollars have been paid out to vaccine injured families with tax payer dollars?
_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen
(Primary site under construction: )
Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
Primary site under construction:
https://immortalhair.org/
Archived as of 2022 here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220330061828/https://www.immortalhair.org/
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
ngb wrote:Odysseus wrote:I don't know why babies aren't vaccinated with all vaccines right away. I would imagine there's a lot going on, like child birth. They receive them before leaving the hospital. I just don't understand your point?
And please address the outbreak of whooping cough in the more affluent areas of California, where the vaccinations rates have dropped dramatically.
Paid shill. That's right. Shilling for big Pharma bought me a gorgeous swimming pool, it'll also buy me that yacht I've been drooling over.
Have you ever looked at the CDC schedule? The only vaccine a baby receives before leaving the hospital is HepB. The others are months later. MMR is 1 year later. A 9 month old can't get measles, mumps or rubella? Why do you think that a baby gets HepB right away but waits for the others?
I don't know. Tell me.
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus wrote:ngb wrote:Odysseus wrote:I don't know why babies aren't vaccinated with all vaccines right away. I would imagine there's a lot going on, like child birth. They receive them before leaving the hospital. I just don't understand your point?
And please address the outbreak of whooping cough in the more affluent areas of California, where the vaccinations rates have dropped dramatically.
Paid shill. That's right. Shilling for big Pharma bought me a gorgeous swimming pool, it'll also buy me that yacht I've been drooling over.
Have you ever looked at the CDC schedule? The only vaccine a baby receives before leaving the hospital is HepB. The others are months later. MMR is 1 year later. A 9 month old can't get measles, mumps or rubella? Why do you think that a baby gets HepB right away but waits for the others?
I don't know. Tell me.
They give the HepB vaccine because some babies are going to be brought back to crack houses in the ghetto. HepB is transmitted sexually and by blood. It's found in areas with high drug use (needle sharing) and prostitution. Basically inner city ghettos. The CDC knows that a small percentage of babies will be brought back to this environment and it would be politically incorrect for them to not give the same recommendations for all children even though it's completely unnecessary for most.
The fact that the CDC recommends the MMR vaccine after a child is one year old should tell you something. They know it is not safe for young babies to get. If it were they would get it before they leave the hospital. An 11 month old can get measles, mumps or rubella, correct? The same goes for all of the other vaccines. Why not just poke them with 5 to 10 shots right away if vaccines are so safe for all children of all ages? They've determined that the MMR vaccine isn't safe for an 11 month old but is safe for a 12 month old. Have they done any studies to determine if it is safe for every 12 month old? Do they think every 12 month old is the same? Do they run any tests on children to see if they can handle the vaccine? Nope. It's a cost benefit analysis, like you mentioned. They know a small percentage of children will have a bad reaction but this is outweighed by the overall benefits of vaccines in their eyes. It's smart for parents to question the CDC schedule and some doctors in these wealthy areas say the same thing. Most aren't outspoken about it so it looks like the parents are just making their own uneducated decision when in reality they are following their doctor's advice.
Vaccine proponents have said that a baby could theoretically get 100,000 vaccines at one time. I think every vaccines proponent should be shot up will all of the vaccines available all at the same time to prove how safe they are. They won't do it. Just like a Monsanto executive won't spray Roundup on their salad to prove how safe it is.
I'm asking for scientific proof of the safety and effectiveness of all vaccines for all children of all ages and have yet to see it. The CDC seems to be admitting, through their vaccine schedule, that they aren't safe for young babies but they can't produce evidence that their schedule is safe for all children and can't identify children who shouldn't get vaccines according to their schedule.
ngb- Posts : 479
Join date : 2013-02-05
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
ngb wrote:Odysseus wrote:ngb wrote:Odysseus wrote:I don't know why babies aren't vaccinated with all vaccines right away. I would imagine there's a lot going on, like child birth. They receive them before leaving the hospital. I just don't understand your point?
And please address the outbreak of whooping cough in the more affluent areas of California, where the vaccinations rates have dropped dramatically.
Paid shill. That's right. Shilling for big Pharma bought me a gorgeous swimming pool, it'll also buy me that yacht I've been drooling over.
Have you ever looked at the CDC schedule? The only vaccine a baby receives before leaving the hospital is HepB. The others are months later. MMR is 1 year later. A 9 month old can't get measles, mumps or rubella? Why do you think that a baby gets HepB right away but waits for the others?
I don't know. Tell me.
They give the HepB vaccine because some babies are going to be brought back to crack houses in the ghetto. HepB is transmitted sexually and by blood. It's found in areas with high drug use (needle sharing) and prostitution. Basically inner city ghettos. The CDC knows that a small percentage of babies will be brought back to this environment and it would be politically incorrect for them to not give the same recommendations for all children even though it's completely unnecessary for most.
The fact that the CDC recommends the MMR vaccine after a child is one year old should tell you something. They know it is not safe for young babies to get. If it were they would get it before they leave the hospital. An 11 month old can get measles, mumps or rubella, correct? The same goes for all of the other vaccines. Why not just poke them with 5 to 10 shots right away if vaccines are so safe for all children of all ages? They've determined that the MMR vaccine isn't safe for an 11 month old but is safe for a 12 month old. Have they done any studies to determine if it is safe for every 12 month old? Do they think every 12 month old is the same? Do they run any tests on children to see if they can handle the vaccine? Nope. It's a cost benefit analysis, like you mentioned. They know a small percentage of children will have a bad reaction but this is outweighed by the overall benefits of vaccines in their eyes. It's smart for parents to question the CDC schedule and some doctors in these wealthy areas say the same thing. Most aren't outspoken about it so it looks like the parents are just making their own uneducated decision when in reality they are following their doctor's advice.
Vaccine proponents have said that a baby could theoretically get 100,000 vaccines at one time. I think every vaccines proponent should be shot up will all of the vaccines available all at the same time to prove how safe they are. They won't do it. Just like a Monsanto executive won't spray Roundup on their salad to prove how safe it is.
I'm asking for scientific proof of the safety and effectiveness of all vaccines for all children of all ages and have yet to see it. The CDC seems to be admitting, through their vaccine schedule, that they aren't safe for young babies but they can't produce evidence that their schedule is safe for all children and can't identify children who shouldn't get vaccines according to their schedule.
Good answer.
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
We are unsure if my boy had chickenpox or hand-foot-mouth a few weeks ago. Got mixed reviews from doctors because its just not common anymore. Anyways, got our pedi to call in an order for blood work to check his varicella titers- also convinced him to check his pertussis, measles, mumps, and rubella titers. Should be interesting to see if he has any immunities. A lot of children are already born with them or get them real young and the parents have no idea. Should know results within the week.
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
http://www.naturalnews.com/047072_MMR_vaccine_autism_government_coverup.html?utm_content=buffer29ae8&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Bet these cocksuckers at the CDC are shitting themselves.
Bet these cocksuckers at the CDC are shitting themselves.
hiilikeyourbeard- Posts : 656
Join date : 2013-10-24
Age : 37
Location : montana, usa
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Sorry Guys, I read the articles on science-based medicine and ya'll are debunked woo quacks. ;]
Organism- Posts : 97
Join date : 2014-03-02
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
regrowhairhero wrote:Sorry Guys, I read the articles on science-based medicine and ya'll are debunked woo quacks. ;]
Lol. Youtube is easy. Science is hard. . .
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
hiilikeyourbeard wrote:http://www.naturalnews.com/047072_MMR_vaccine_autism_government_coverup.html?utm_content=buffer29ae8&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Bet these cocksuckers at the CDC are shitting themselves.
Debunked several hundred times already. I'd sent you a list of science based links but if you're reading Mike Adams (Health Ranger) there's really no point.
Odysseus- Posts : 636
Join date : 2009-12-18
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Odysseus, please get the Ebola vaccine. PLEASE.
hiilikeyourbeard- Posts : 656
Join date : 2013-10-24
Age : 37
Location : montana, usa
Re: OT: Infant Vaccinations: My Dilemna
Beyond all the propaganda over the 'safety' of vaccines.....It should be quite obvious if anyone performs a cursory investigation based on the ingredients in the vaccines alone.
Mercury (in any form is bad)....Yes all of the vaccines contain it. During the manufacturing process. However, they will tell you they not do not add any after manufacture....still they contain plenty of mercury.
Aluminium - injected into the blood stream is a massive collateral damage.
Both of these metals alone should be enough reason to avoid vaccines...but wait, there's even more.....
Mycoplasma (40% of vaccines contain it). Cursory research on this will explain a lot.
Animal fetal tissue (who needs foreign DNA injected into our blood?) The truth is, any type of tissue without our native DNA is chemically tagged to be rejected.
Viruses injected into our blood create serious problems.
Vaccination is not immunization.
Real immunization means being in contact with natural microbes, which bolster the immune ecology.
There's more additives I could mention that go into vaccines, however I think the main ones are important enough reasons.
Critical thinking skills will explain the following:
Good sanitation is the primary reason why we live longer.
It used to be that a bad thyroid would compromise the immune system to a point where we no longer could kill
a pathogen.....so antibiotics came along and allowed sick people to eradicate their acute illness.
In the early going, the 1918 flu pandemic was not from some mysterious air born disease.....it was from an over dose of aspirin (no one knew the correct dose).
Other diseases came along with massive over doses of antibiotics, and toxins identified and not identified.
Looking at the actual data....all of the so-called outbreaks vastly declined before the advent of the vaccine.
There's decades of research that demonstrate the high-dose vitamin C will prevent or treat acute viral/bacteria outbreaks more effectively than these toxic laden vaccines.
Finally, at the very least it should be considered that vaccines on human beings have never been subjected (properly tested) by way of double blind, placebo controlled studies, proving safety and efficacy.
Mercury (in any form is bad)....Yes all of the vaccines contain it. During the manufacturing process. However, they will tell you they not do not add any after manufacture....still they contain plenty of mercury.
Aluminium - injected into the blood stream is a massive collateral damage.
Both of these metals alone should be enough reason to avoid vaccines...but wait, there's even more.....
Mycoplasma (40% of vaccines contain it). Cursory research on this will explain a lot.
Animal fetal tissue (who needs foreign DNA injected into our blood?) The truth is, any type of tissue without our native DNA is chemically tagged to be rejected.
Viruses injected into our blood create serious problems.
Vaccination is not immunization.
Real immunization means being in contact with natural microbes, which bolster the immune ecology.
There's more additives I could mention that go into vaccines, however I think the main ones are important enough reasons.
Critical thinking skills will explain the following:
Good sanitation is the primary reason why we live longer.
It used to be that a bad thyroid would compromise the immune system to a point where we no longer could kill
a pathogen.....so antibiotics came along and allowed sick people to eradicate their acute illness.
In the early going, the 1918 flu pandemic was not from some mysterious air born disease.....it was from an over dose of aspirin (no one knew the correct dose).
Other diseases came along with massive over doses of antibiotics, and toxins identified and not identified.
Looking at the actual data....all of the so-called outbreaks vastly declined before the advent of the vaccine.
There's decades of research that demonstrate the high-dose vitamin C will prevent or treat acute viral/bacteria outbreaks more effectively than these toxic laden vaccines.
Finally, at the very least it should be considered that vaccines on human beings have never been subjected (properly tested) by way of double blind, placebo controlled studies, proving safety and efficacy.
_________________
My regimen
http://www.immortalhair.org/mpb-regimen
(Primary site under construction: )
Now available for consultation (hair and/or health)
http://www.immortalhair.org/health-consultation
Primary site under construction:
https://immortalhair.org/
Archived as of 2022 here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220330061828/https://www.immortalhair.org/
Page 21 of 40 • 1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 30 ... 40
Similar topics
» OT - Vaccinations
» CausticSymmetry, would you recommend any vaccinations ..
» Off-topic: Female/Maternal/Infant health resources?
» Infant vitamin d supplementation and allergic conditions in adulthood
» Not Taking Supplements Causes Miscarriage, Birthing Problems, Infant Mortality
» CausticSymmetry, would you recommend any vaccinations ..
» Off-topic: Female/Maternal/Infant health resources?
» Infant vitamin d supplementation and allergic conditions in adulthood
» Not Taking Supplements Causes Miscarriage, Birthing Problems, Infant Mortality
Page 21 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 3:53 pm by CausticSymmetry
» Indian gooseberry
Today at 3:41 pm by shaftless
» Is this beneficial bacterial strain the Pièce de résistance?
Yesterday at 12:12 pm by CausticSymmetry
» *The first scientific evidence in 2021 that viruses do not exist*
Sat Oct 26, 2024 3:04 pm by CausticSymmetry
» Hair Thickness Growth Effect of Adenosine Complex in Male-/Female-Patterned Hair Loss via Inhibition of Androgen Receptor Signaling
Tue Oct 22, 2024 5:17 pm by CausticSymmetry
» Carnivore Diet filled in bald spot.
Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:19 pm by CausticSymmetry
» Hair Loss (testing)
Fri Oct 18, 2024 1:58 pm by CausticSymmetry
» Oil pulling receipes
Wed Oct 16, 2024 3:32 pm by CausticSymmetry
» Challenging Old Dogmas
Tue Oct 15, 2024 2:51 pm by CausticSymmetry