I think I know how to remove calcification from the scalp

perhaps a better idea would be a

huetiful head steamer

iuyyighghghgkh wrote:perhaps a better idea would be a

huetiful head steamer

I dont think that's a good idea especially for those like me with inflamed scalps.

iuyyighghghgkh wrote:perhaps a better idea would be a

huetiful head steamer

I like to stick my head inside nuclear reactors. Much quicker than cupping.

look into steaming and saunas

this will also get rid of gunk in the skin

This guy takes it to new levels


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUIRr7E_1uU

rubbing vodka, and basically everything into his skin. he also uses gua sha to scrape away gunk

iuyyighghghgkh wrote:look into steaming and saunas

this will also get rid of gunk in the skin

This guy takes it to new levels


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUIRr7E_1uU

rubbing vodka, and basically everything into his skin. he also uses gua sha to scrape away gunk

That is one very ripped, old man.

I did some research a year ago on steaming and saunas and I don't think they help regrow hair... but, who really knows with all this stuff anyway.

I actually no longer believe the calcification theory for anyone who is wondering.

I think it is the arterial plaque theory. a combination of plaque, calcium and other junk in the arteries that is blocking hair from forming.
you need to remove arterial plaque from your scalp and diploic veins.

to remove it, instead of

k2, d3, msm, magnesium , edta,  etc


a much better option is

vitamin c
lysine - it may also inhibit 5 alpha reductase. also converts to carnitine.
p5p (vitamin b6) to absorb the lysine better . b6 also lowers prolactin

Why the pattern then?

Brabus wrote:Why the pattern then?

good question

if you mean, the pattern in which male baldness starts, well that is different for everyone

or here is a wild theory

perhaps the pattern is formed because,

imagine a vein that supplies nutrients to the scalp
imagine squeezing and tightening this vein.
what areas would lose the nutrients and oxygen first ? The answer is the outside area.

This is of course, just a guess.

Brabus wrote:Why the pattern then?

Good question. According to the mainstream THEORY, for which there still needs to be evidence ( their biggest argument is the study about transplantation done about 7 eons ago (pretty shitty terms right?)) follicles are genetically pre programmed to die off.... So, you were born with a luxurious crop of hair just to lose it when it's the most important thing for self image. Good causal linking right there, totally unbiased for making billions in terms of profit ... Well, even if you take a look at more receded "patterns", like this one http://www.freeallimages.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/jason-statham-4.jpg , you will see that if you put more hair on top and top front, and make it infuse and connect to the side "hairline", you'll see that none of the hair is lost on the side, temple bald spots looks just bald because top front starts slimming and loses the connection with the side front... So, would you also believe that the areas where he has sharply defined pattern (only a coincidence right?), where he has thick nice strong terminal hair, and then it suddenly stops at 1 very linear shape... Do you believe that the hairs which are spaced out less than only 1 mm have completely different genetic coding? I think that is ridicolous and there is way more to it than that. It's what this entire forum is about. Immortalhair.forumandco.com = anti- androgenetic theory. People can believe whatever they wish though. Maybe not completely against the part of that theory, but completely against the explanations and treatment options, and the actual reality with which they present their theory and think it's sufficient evidence.

I agree with you completely but my question was to the previous poster that mentioned the arterial plaque theory. If the arteries are clogged why are there still hair on the sides.

Let me also add that the patterns are exactly on the same spot as the galea aponeurotica. So there is definetly a link with that.

stanis wrote:

Brabus wrote:Why the pattern then?

Good question. According to the mainstream THEORY, for which there still needs to be evidence ( their biggest argument is the study about transplantation done about 7 eons ago (pretty shitty terms right?)) follicles are genetically pre programmed to die off.... So, you were born with a luxurious crop of hair just to lose it when it's the most important thing for self image. Good causal linking right there, totally unbiased for making billions in terms of profit ... Well, even if you take a look at more receded "patterns", like this one http://www.freeallimages.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/jason-statham-4.jpg , you will see that if you put more hair on top and top front, and make it infuse and connect to the side "hairline", you'll see that none of the hair is lost on the side, temple bald spots looks just bald because top front starts slimming and loses the connection with the side front... So, would you also believe that the areas where he has sharply defined pattern (only a coincidence right?), where he has thick nice strong terminal hair, and then it suddenly stops at 1 very linear shape... Do you believe that the hairs which are spaced out less than only 1 mm have completely different genetic coding? I think that is ridicolous and there is way more to it than that. It's what this entire forum is about. Immortalhair.forumandco.com = anti- androgenetic theory. People can believe whatever they wish though. Maybe not completely against the part of that theory, but completely against the explanations and treatment options, and the actual reality with which they present their theory and think it's sufficient evidence.

Okay

So why don't I lose hair from the middle, and then it spreads outwards ?

In most people, they almost always lose the sides first.

Brabus wrote:I agree with you completely but my question was to the previous poster that mentioned the arterial plaque theory. If the arteries are clogged why are there still hair on the sides.

Let me also add that the patterns are exactly on the same spot as the galea aponeurotica. So there is definetly a link with that.

I am referring only to male pattern baldness, but I will still answer you.

Most people lose hair from the outside, and then it creeps inwards .

See my other post for an analogy I made.

My final point, if d3 and k2 are good for hair loss,

then the Linus Pauling method (with b6 added in ) would be even better.

iuyyighghghgkh wrote:

stanis wrote:

Brabus wrote:Why the pattern then?

Good question. According to the mainstream THEORY, for which there still needs to be evidence ( their biggest argument is the study about transplantation done about 7 eons ago (pretty shitty terms right?)) follicles are genetically pre programmed to die off.... So, you were born with a luxurious crop of hair just to lose it when it's the most important thing for self image. Good causal linking right there, totally unbiased for making billions in terms of profit ... Well, even if you take a look at more receded "patterns", like this one http://www.freeallimages.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/jason-statham-4.jpg , you will see that if you put more hair on top and top front, and make it infuse and connect to the side "hairline", you'll see that none of the hair is lost on the side, temple bald spots looks just bald because top front starts slimming and loses the connection with the side front... So, would you also believe that the areas where he has sharply defined pattern (only a coincidence right?), where he has thick nice strong terminal hair, and then it suddenly stops at 1 very linear shape... Do you believe that the hairs which are spaced out less than only 1 mm have completely different genetic coding? I think that is ridicolous and there is way more to it than that. It's what this entire forum is about. Immortalhair.forumandco.com = anti- androgenetic theory. People can believe whatever they wish though. Maybe not completely against the part of that theory, but completely against the explanations and treatment options, and the actual reality with which they present their theory and think it's sufficient evidence.

Okay

So why don't I lose hair from the middle, and then it spreads outwards ?

In most people, they almost always lose the sides first.

If a man is sensitive to balding, and ends up being completely bald at age say 30-35, why doesn't he end up bald immediately after puberty or at 20 years of age? Testosterone is high, and it's circualting in the scalp. How come follicles then, don't convert all that T to DHT inside the follicles with the reductase enzyme, and one becomes a NW5 from NW1 in a matter of instant? That makes even less sense. And there are already theories out there which explain the exact pattern causaly, the pattern itself has to be locally mediated, unless if it's purely genetic (for which there is no evidence and doesn't rly make sense) ... but they are regarded as "no-evidence" even if there are studies on various portals and ncbi that back certain theories up.

Also, if it's genetic, your d3, k2 etc will hardly do anything and are useless... Think about it. If hair is really that sensitive that it takes a small treshold for the DHT to wreck transcriptional havoc, and the follicles will be under that same attack each week... week to week for a very long time.. So I guess you really have to "pick your side" as they say it.
I'll be here tomorrow, wonder what people think.

Well, what I think is, DHT is not causing hair loss in some people.

You are right. If DHT only causes hair loss, throw away your k2 and d3, because hair loss has nothing to do with the arteries or calcification.

But if it did have something to do with arteries, then we may as well put as much research into that as possible.

plaque lesions are also connected to the thyroid.

iuyyighghghgkh

I dont know about the arterial plaque but every time my temporal arteries are pulsating, Im losing hair and my head is overheating.

What can this be you think?

Brabus wrote:iuyyighghghgkh

I dont know about the arterial plaque but every time my temporal arteries are pulsating,  Im losing hair and my head is overheating.

What can this be you think?

I have no idea.

but I can only say what I have said before, it may be arterial plaque and atherosclerosis.

this will constrict blood flow and it won't flow properly to the scalp

another point of interest - lysine is used to remove plaque and repair the arteries. also,
lysine is used and discussed on many hair loss forums and makes propecia work better.
So I think there is a legitimate connection here.

it's ignorance to think only d3/k2 will help

however the linus pauling institute missed one small detail , you need b6, ideally p5p, to make the lysine more effective

you don't want this in your veins/arteries

Actually I know why im losing my hair (the mechanism) but dont know how to stop it and no its not arterial plaque

Brabus wrote:Actually I know why im losing my hair (the mechanism) but dont know how to stop it and no its not arterial plaque

well, the only accepted "mechanism" is dht

so is dht the reason you are losing your hair ?

No no no and no. Maybe you but not me.
Ive used fin for 2 years, dut for 6months, oral spiro for 2,3months, beta sitosterol... without even stopping the hair loss, I guess I can safely say dht is not the culprit.

Hypohidrosis is the term that they use for my issue. Basically im not sweating enough from the scalp since a car accident. My head becomes overheated and hair loss occurs. DT (squeezing) helps me a little bit to take ou the heat and baking soda orally.

Brabus wrote:No no no and no. Maybe you but not me.
Ive used fin for 2 years, dut for 6months, oral spiro for 2,3months, beta sitosterol... without even stopping the hair loss, I guess I can safely say dht is not the culprit.

Anhydrosis is the term that they use for my issue. Basically im not sweating enough from the scalp since a car accident. My head becomes overheated and hair loss occurs. DT (squeezing) helps me a little bit to take ou the heat and baking soda orally.

Aha

Only a few months ago on the forum we thought Ebola was the cause of hair loss

ignore my previous ramblings

after re-reading hair like a fox, "calcification" is not calcium

it is myxedema , aka Mucopolysaccharides aka glycosaminoglycans

myxedema is a dry, waxy type of swelling with abnormal deposits of mucin in the skin . like a cholesterol wax, caused by low thyroid.

It isn't calcium. although k2 is a great supplement.

to dissolve myxedema , lugols is the best thing.

iuyyighghghgkh wrote:ignore my previous ramblings

after re-reading hair like a fox, "calcification" is not calcium

it is myxedema , aka Mucopolysaccharides  aka glycosaminoglycans

myxedema is a dry, waxy type of swelling  with abnormal deposits of mucin in the skin . like a cholesterol wax, caused by low thyroid.

It isn't calcium. although k2 is a great supplement.

to dissolve  myxedema , lugols is the best thing.

interesting. any more info on this? would make sense i suppose! would stress spead this up?

iuyyighghghgkh wrote:ignore my previous ramblings

after re-reading hair like a fox, "calcification" is not calcium

it is myxedema , aka Mucopolysaccharides  aka glycosaminoglycans

myxedema is a dry, waxy type of swelling  with abnormal deposits of mucin in the skin . like a cholesterol wax, caused by low thyroid.

It isn't calcium. although k2 is a great supplement.

to dissolve  myxedema , lugols is the best thing.

Interesting thesis.

- How did you come up with it? Where did you get the connection that the swelling, we are witnessing is a myxedema?

- Is your hypothesis, that the deposites we have are LIKE myxedema, or do you want to say, that they ARE myxedema (I'm asking, because myxodema is a desease connected to thyroid - so it has to be healed that way / a deposit that is like myxedema, but not created by a thyroid disfunction could be healed other way)

- where did you get the connection between lugol and myxedema. Do you want to say, that we have a iodine deficiency (which I doubt)?

Thanks for your answers.