Evidence suggests that up to 90 percent of landmark cancer research may be false

(NaturalNews) The vast majority of the published scientific literature on cancer and cancer research is inherently flawed and non-reproducible, reveals a new review published online in the journal Nature. Researchers C. Glenn Begley and Lee Ellis found that a mere 11 percent of 53 papers on cancer published in reputable, peer-reviewed journals was solid, while the other 89 percent could not be reproduced, implying that it may be false or at the very least misleading.


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040230_cancer_research_false_conclusions.html#ixzz2Sd5Afy7g

A quote from the comment section

They know how to cure cancer but they strictly do no want to use true science. It would ruin their business model, and the US which is runned by MASS MURDERERS, yes it is, is not there to defend the interests and the health of the People but these criminals against humanity. I consider today the FDA and US big pharma but also big agra, the biggest terrorist threat to humanity and to scientific knowledge and human progress. For that matter United States of America when it comes to cancer research and real science is negative and dark force today as bad as Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany. No it is not an exageration.

Perhaps this is why 97% of Chemotherapy patients die? It does not work.

I wonder the percentage of flawed studies in other ailments...

Nice catch! ..and scary.

I wonder the percentage of flawed studies in other ailments...

Got me thinking of this article:
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/lies-damned-lies-and-medical-science/308269/

Yup, exactly. I mentioned that to help others try and think what's going on. That they are very good with trauma and emergency medicine but that's about it.

There are older threads about this and here is one and it's always good for a reminder and to mention this to all the new people who have come here since.

"The drug companies hire professional writers who are good at lying/falsifying/distorting news because after a century and a half + of distorting the truth they have it down to a (PTP) science.

more info = https://immortalhair.forumotion.com/t8409-self-education-tips-complementary-health

Check this out, it may straighten the view of what has/is going on..

David Icke - CANCER IS A CURABLE FUNGUS

Hi FATE,

I don't know if this will help anyone here but in reality, cancer is a pleomorphic. Meaning, the ability for a pathogen to shapeshift from a virus to a bacteria to fungal. The fungal part is closer to the end result while viral is an earlier stage.

Attacking cancer as fungus is not the best route. There is much more to cancer and different forms of cancer. For example, cancer could have come from a toxin or radiation, etc.. Here is the best protocol for the average person. http://www.royalrife.com/cancer.html And for those who can research further and not get overwhelmed and after following the protocol from the prior link, my site has a large collection of unknown and some of the best cancer information IMO/IME but is scattered everywhere on the site. http://electromedicine.wordpress.com/

What do we make out of this?
http://www.naturalnews.com/040290_cancer_disease_prevention_scientific_findings.html

Yes true, IMO, except for the PH information which is more to it. But that article is not a good summary on cancer, IMO, and while also good for prevention, when you get to stage 4, things are different than fighting cancer at stage 3 and earlier.