Shattering Cancer With Electronic Signals! Help Us Equip The New Lab!

rdkml wrote:
Yes, novobiotronics is using a plasma bulb to deliver the frequencies. A plasma bulb is a very old method and also what Royal Rife originally did as well. One keeps the plasma bulb X inches away from the target area being treated.

They are using a Rife/Bare device. The method they found to kill cancer cells appears to be somewhat new (using original frequency as well as 11th harmonic at a minimum of 10 hours) but the device is a very old device which is still commonly used and sold today.

Past research has shown that cancers growth is slowed such as with this FDA approved device for brain tumors even though they are not using a specific frequency which would have given even better results. But when targeting cancer cells directly like Dr. Holland is doing with a specific frequency or combination of specific frequencies, the possibility here is amazing.

FredtheBelgian wrote:

Nashville Hairline wrote:Rife/radionics is a scam

Here is a man who died from testicular cancer cos he ignored his doctor's advice to get surgery and used radionics instead. Thankfully, the person who sold the machine to him was taken to court
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20071221&slug=indictment21m

More here:
http://seattletimes.com/html/medicaldevices/

Thank you .

Beebrox wrote:It's important which halogen is put in the bulb?

Nashville Hairline wrote:

FredtheBelgian wrote:

Nashville Hairline wrote:Rife/radionics is a scam

Here is a man who died from testicular cancer cos he ignored his doctor's advice to get surgery and used radionics instead. Thankfully, the person who sold the machine to him was taken to court
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20071221&slug=indictment21m

More here:
http://seattletimes.com/html/medicaldevices/

Thank you .

You're welcome I see that you are the last person left who doesn't believe this pseudo-science that is curing* a total of zero people of their ailments..

*note: an internet testimonial is not evidence of a cure

FredtheBelgian wrote:One isolated experience?

http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=1335329

http://healthwyze.org/index.php/component/content/article/586-mail-bag-12-dr-brownsteins-carnage-and-drinking-iodine.html

Dear Rife Forum Friends,

We are proud to announce that we have reached a major milestone in our research with a Rife device against cancer! For the first time in the history of modern day Rife related devices, we have had a very important scientific paper published based on our successful experiments with a Rife-Bare plasma device against cancer cells!

The paper was delivered in Europe this past October (2012) and subsequently published as part of the official Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF. The presentation included photos and video of cancer cells being shattered in vitro by a Rife-Bare plasma device. We believe this is the first time that a scientific paper has been published documenting the successful use of a Rife plasma type device against cancer cells in a major cancer research center (Thomas Jefferson University Medical College, Division of Surgical Research, Philadelphia, PA).

The paper is attached in PDF format.

We are now completing major renovations on a new laboratory space which will be dedicated to the use of Rife technology against cancer. Please go to this link to learn more about this important effort:

http://igg.me/p/237725?a=1373370

1
MORPHOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF HUMAN
CANCER CELLS AND MICROTUBULES CAUSED BY
FREQUENCY SPECIFIC PULSED ELECTRIC FIELDS
BROADCAST BY AN ENCLOSED GAS PLASMA ANTENNA
GERARD DUBOST1, ANTHONY HOLLAND2, JAMES BARE3, FREDERIC
BELLOSSI4
1 EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF RENNES 1 FRANCE
dubost.gerard@wanadoo.fr
2 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR SKIDMORE COLLEGE, NEW YORK US
tholland@skidmore.edu
3 DC ALBUQUERQUE NM US jbare@plasmasonics.com
4 ESE ENGINEER, RESEARCHER BORDEAUX FRANCE
Abstract
Frequency specific, specially tuned, pulsed, amplitude modulated radio frequency fields utilizing an
enclosed gas plasma antenna [Plasma Emission Field Treatment (PEFT)] can have dramatic
disruptive effects on the morphology of human cancer cells in vitro. The morphological
transformations are photographed and video taped.
On the basis of the characterization of the electromagnetic field generated by the gas plasma antenna,
a model of the action of the PEFT on the cells, based on the cells microtubule mechanical resonances
during their mitotic spindle cleavage, is developed to explain the cells destruction in vitro.
Furthermore, considering the electric field attenuation inside organs, we can expect a similar
destructive effect in vivo inside cancerous organs.
Background and objectives
New physical treatments with electric fields applied to cell cultures and to patients suffering from
metastatic tumors have recently been published. The anti-proliferation of tumor cells has been greatly
enhanced by applying alternating electric fields, designated as Tumor Treating Fields or TTFields,
combined with various chemotherapeutic treatments in vitro and in vivo [1]. The alternating electric
fields of low intensity (1-2 V/cm), at frequencies between 100 and 200 kHz, are applied to the skin
surface by special insulated electrodes. Despite the use of low intensity electric fields applied to
recurrent glioblastoma patients, and the power density between the electrodes maintained below
220 mW/cm2, this treatment can be considered as a thermal treatment. Another report of experiments
with hepatocellular carcinoma cells, in vivo and in vitro, has been recently published [2] in which a
radio carrier frequency of 27.12 MHz is amplitude modulated with a low frequency randomly chosen
between 100 Hz and 21 kHz.
There is no known biological mechanism explaining the anti-proliferative effect with such very low
intensity electric fields [1] [2], however it appears that the electric field does not affect the division of
non-malignant cells and is not responsible for any toxicity, in contrast to the well-established toxicity
of most chemotherapy treatments. These authors only suggest that either a specific AC frequency or
a specific amplitude modulation frequency is able to destabilize the mitotic spindle during cell
division. Because the axis of cell division is randomly oriented, one approach has been to use
multiple electric field polarizations sequentially applied to increase the treatment efficacy.
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
2
The Plasma Emission Field Treatment (PEFT) utilizes a special plasma antenna, called a
, which acts according to an isotropic non-polarized emission. The destruction and antiproliferation
caused by the plasma antenna system when applied against cancer cells are obtained by
a non-thermal effect. A model based on the microtubule fundamental mechanical resonance
frequencies, which are different in vivo and in vitro, is developed to explain the PEFT results.
Material and Methods
The Rife-Bare Device
The Rife-Bare device (Photo 1) is described in [3]. A digitally synthesized square wave generator
(Atelier Robin F125 [www.atelierrobin.net]) in the frequency range of 500 Hz to 250 kHz, duty
cycles ranging from 50% to 70%, is used as input to control the amplitude modulation of a
27.12 MHz carrier signal of a prototype radio frequency transmitter (OM2 Plasma Sonics Ltd.,
Albuquerque, New Mexico) where the index of modulation was higher than 1.
with a complex spectral envelope. The signals are sent through a custom-built 300-W amplifier
(Plasma Sonics Ltd.) and then through a special antenna tuner to internal metal electrodes inside the
phanotron spherical tube, which is filled with helium gas. The pulsing electric field stimulates the
helium atoms into a plasma state. The plasma acts as an isotropic non-polarized antenna emitting a
very small non-thermal energy into cells and organs. With a spectrum analyzer coupled to a small
circular magnetic loop, we measured the magnetic induction near field B (1) radiated at a modulation
frequency f in air medium. We deduced the near electric field E (2).
Photo 1: Phanotron Radiation Measurements Photo 2: Measurements cells in vitro
R f
PZ
r
B r 2 2 2
2
0
2
(1)
f r
E c B
2
2
(2) R2
P P d (3)
r0 and r are the radial distances respectively of the loop center and of the observation point from the
phanotron spherical plasma tube center. P is the power measured by the spectrum analyzer and Pd is
the measured power density at the circular loop level, R being its radius. Z is the standardization
resistance and c the light speed in vacuum. B and E respectively follow the law in 1/r2 and 1/r3.
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
3
Electric field in vivo
Inside a living non-magnetic body, the induction magnetic field B is unchanged. On the other hand,
the near electric field Ei is equal to (4), ñ = n-jk being the living body complex index of refraction:
n~ 2
E E i
(4) with
0
2
2
~ 2 2 2 2
n n k r (5)
r and are the relative dielectric constant and the conductivity of the living body.
In vitro experimental set-up
The plasma tube is located near the stage of an inverted research microscope with a high-resolution
video camera (Photo 2). 96-well plates of human cancer cells are set on the microscope stage,
exposed to the PEFT and the results are photographed and videotaped in real time. The distance from
the phanotron electrodes to the cancer cells is 45 centimeters for all experiments. Pulse rate, pulse
envelope shape, power levels and spectral content of the PEFT pulse are correlated with dramatic
changes in cancer cell morphology, including fragmentation and total disintegration of many types of
cancer cells. Human leukemia and ovarian cancer cells received PEFT alone, while human pancreatic
cancer cells received PEFT in combination with low doses of a standard chemotherapeutic agent
(Gemcitabine, Eli Lilly and Company).
Results
Human cancer cell measurements in vitro
Several types of human cancer cells were treated with PEFT in experiments (Photo 2) including
leukemia cells (K 562 cell line with a modulation frequency of 197 kHz, 10 hours PEFT, 250 W) [4],
pancreatic cancer cells (MIA PaCa-2 and Capan-1cell lines: 2 hours PEFT, 150 kHz, 310 W, and 8
hours PEFT: one hour each of 155 to 162 kHz, 310 W) [5], and ovarian cancer cells (A2780 cell line
5 hours PEFT at 114 kHz, 300 W, then 3 hours PEFT at 150 kHz, 325 W [6]. Data from those
experiments provide substantial evidence that certain types of cancer cells can be killed and
simultaneously slowed in their growth rate using this type of treatment on cancer cells in vitro. PEFT
resulted in dramatic morphological transformations of a significant percentage of each type of cancer,
in many cases resulting in fragmentation and total disintegration of many of the cells. Percent
cytotoxicity of PEFT and number of remaining viable leukemia cells treated with PEFT are shown in
[3] (Pages 81-84). Cytotoxicity of leukemia cells treated with PEFT is increased by a factor of 3
compared to control cells.
Above: a time-lapse photo montage of three human leukemia cells: two of the cells are
shattered into fragments by the PEFT experiment
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
4
Above: a time-lapse photo montage of two human pancreatic cancer cells: one of the cells is
shattered into fragments by the PEFT experiment
Above: a time-lapse photo montage of human ovarian cancer cells: one cell is shattered into
fragments by the PEFT experiment.
Induction magnetic field measurements and deduced electric field in air medium.
Table 1 shows the induction magnetic field B radiated by the phanotron tube measured at a distance
r = ro = 5 cm from the sphere center. The modulation frequency range is between 100 and 200 kHz .
P(dBm) is the power measured with the spectrum analyzer, B is deduced from (1) with Z = 70 ohms,
R = 6 10-3 m and the power density Pd is given by (3).
f (kHz) 100 120 140 150 170 200
P (dBm) -67 -66 -66 -66 -65 -64
B (T) (1) 2.4 10-6 2.2 10-6 1.9 10-6 1.8 10-6 1.7 10-6 1.7 10-6
Pd (mW/cm2) (3) 1.8 10-7 2.2 10-7 2.2 10-7 2.2 10-7 2.8 10-7 3.5 10-7
Table 1: Phanotron radiation (r = ro = 5 cm)
The phanotron radiation is isotropic and non-polarized, that is the measured power P is about
constant to within 0.5 dB whatever the loop position and its location at r constant around the
spherical plasma tube (Photos 1). Such a radiation is due to a set of dipoles randomly distributed
between the two electrodes inside a volume of some cubic centimeters. This is an advantage,
knowing that the axis of the cell division is randomly oriented during the mitotic spindle cleavage.
As shown in Table 2, the measured induction field B varies following the law 1/r2:
r (cm) 5.0 7.2 10.5
Experiments (dB) 0 -6.5 -12.3
Theory (dB) (1) 0 -6.33 -12.89
Table 2: B and its law in 1/r2
Tables 3 and 4 below give the radiated electric field E in air medium deduced from B in formula (2).
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
5
f (kHz) 100 120 140 150 170 200
E (V/m) (2) 6.7 106 5.3 106 3.9 106 3.4 106 2.9 106 2.4 106
Table 3: Electric field in terms of the frequency radiated in air medium at r = 5 cm
f (kHz) 100 120 140 150 170 200
E (V/m) (2) 9.2 103 7.2 103 5.3 103 4.6 103 4.0 103 3.3 103
Table 4: Electric field in terms of the frequency radiated in air medium at r = 45 cm
The electric field modulus is sufficient to destroy cancerous cells in vitro (Table 4: between 92 to
33 V/cm) when, according [1] and [2], a value between 1 and 2 V/cm can arrest cell proliferation in
tumors.
Discussion
Microtubule mechanical resonance model
Microtubules play a fundamental role throughout the whole life of eukaryotic cells. For several
decades, the dynamic behavior of microtubules has been a subject of great interest. The recent
understanding of the microtubule cytoskeleton and the interactions existing among the tubulin
subunits and the global static electrical state have been used to propose a special microtubule
mechanical model [3] to explain its instability and destruction when the prometaphase of cellular
division takes place.
The opposed longitudinal static forces FS applied at the two ends of one microtubule belonging to the
mitotic spindle are given by ([3] p.138) and recalled in (6):
2
0
2 2
L
F Q
r
S (6).
L is the microtubule length and Q the static positive and negative electric charges located at its two
ends with Q = 7.5 10-17 Coulombs and r = 80. Then from (6) we have in SI units:
24 2
S (7).
The static electric field along the microtubule is equal to (:
(.
The microtubule is modeled as a hollow cylindrical rod of exterior diameter D and with a thickness of
2RP firmly attached at each of its two ends. The static pressure applied on the microtubule section S is
equal to: . The protein radius is RP equal to 2.5 nm.
With (7) and D = 24 nm, we obtain: 8 2
S (9) in SI units.
The fundamental static mechanical vibration frequency is equal to:
S
E I
L
f L
r . 3.56
2 (10).
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
6
EL is the Young modulus and I S is the microtubule rod gyration radius. For a hollow rod we
have: for D >> RP. Finally with the density = 103 kg/m3 we find:
10 2
r L (11).
The cell microtubules mechanical instabilities
During the mitotic spindle cleavage, we attribute the morphological transformations of human cancer
cells, exposed to PEFT, to the fundamental mechanical resonance frequencies fr of their microtubules,
which depend on their length and Young modulus (11). The study in [8] shows a significant decrease
of the bending modulus with increasing temperature equal to 6 107 Pa at 20 °C and 2 107 Pa at 37 °C.
The bending modulus closely corresponds to the Young modulus EL when L >> D. Table 5 shows the
microtubule lengths L in terms of their fundamental mechanical resonance frequencies fr between 100
and 200 kHz in vitro (20 °C) and in vivo (37 °C).
fr (kHz)
(11)
L (μm)
in vivo 37 °C
EL = 2 107 Pa
in vitro 20 °C
EL = 6 107 Pa
100 6.5 8.6
120 5.9 7.8
140 5.5 7.2
160 5.1 6.8
180 4.8 6.4
200 4.6 6.1
Table 5: Cell microtubule lengths L (micrometers) in terms of their fundamental mechanical
resonance frequencies fr in vivo and in vitro
These results are consistent with the experimental data in relation to the optimal TTField frequencies
for cells and microtubule size [9]. As an example, cell radiuses of 9 and 5
approximately to those of melanoma and glioma respectively at frequencies of 100 and 200 kHz.
The conductivity and the relative dielectric constant are given in terms of frequency for several
organs [7]. Then from the results shown on Table 3 and with (4), we deduced in the figure below, the
electric field Ei expressed in V/cm for the frequencies between 100 and 200 kHz at r = 5 cm.
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
100 120 140 160 180 200
Modulation frequency f (kHz)
Grey matter Liver Spleen Infl ated lung
Kidney Cortical bone Breast fat
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
100 120 140 160 180 200
Modulation frequency f (kHz)
Interstitial medium Uterus Muscle
Ovary Heart Aorta
Skin wet
Figure 1: Electric field Ei in various organs in terms of the frequency radiated by a phanotron placed
at r = 5 cm
Table 6 below shows r (cm) from the phanotron sphere center for Ei = 1 V/cm at f = 100 kHz.
Organ r (cm)
Uterus 5.30
Muscle 5.65
Ovary 6.21
Heart 6.46
Aorta 6.60
Skin wet 7.27
Grey matter 7.78
Liver 8.22
Spleen 8.72
Inflated lung 9.22
Kidney 10.24
Cortical bone 12.2
Breast fat 15.3
Table 6: Distance of the organs to the Rife-Bare phanotron to expose the organs to an electric field of
1 V/cm
Conclusion
Up to now, there was no known model explaining the anti-proliferative non-thermal effect of very low
electric field intensity. The Plasma Emission Field Treatment (PEFT) can have dramatic disruptive
non-thermal effects on the morphology of human cancer cells exposed to tumor-specific modulation
frequencies in vitro (temperature = 20 °C) and can be designed to replicate these effects in vivo
(temperature = 37 °C) with a significant lowering of modulation frequencies. The specific carrier wave
modulation frequencies are the same as the cancer cell microtubule static mechanical resonance
frequencies (f = fr) during the mitotic spindle cleavage. The minimum electric field level of 1 V/cm
can be reached by keeping the phanotron close to the subject's body or by increasing the emission
power.
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
8
In a typical cell culture, the axis of cell division is randomly oriented with only a fraction of the
dividing cells subject to optimal treatment by a polarized electric field. Two perpendicular fields were
found to be 20% more effective than a single directional field for B16F1 and F-98 cells [10]. Our
phanotron electric field emission is perfectly isotropous due to uniformly scattered dipoles between
the electrodes located inside the spherical tube.
On the tube surface, the low level measured power density, roughly equal to 10-7 W/cm2, can explain
the non-thermal biological effects of PEFT.
Inside different organs, and between 100 and 200 kHz the electric field intensity is on the order of
some V/cm.
Electronic cancer treatment devices, other than the Rife-Bare device, which use a fixed frequency
applied for a lengthy duration, provide a narrow window of opportunity for effectiveness in slowing
and destroying cancer cells. The interaction of the frequency with cell size, local temperature, and
spindle length, explains why these other electronic units are not as successful as they should be. Our
theory and experimental data also help to explain the reason for slow patient response time with
electronic treatments that utilize only one fixed frequency.
Acknowledgements
efficient participation in the spectral analyzer measurements.
The authors are grateful to Dr. Jonathan Brody and the Thomas Jefferson University Medical College
for providing several cancer cell lines for these experiments.
References
[1] Eilon D Kirson,
sen
Physics 2009, 9:1
[2] J W Zimmerman, M J Penisson specific
modulation frequencies» published in December 2011.
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v106/n2/full/bjc2011523a.html#bib1
[3] -
-1-4710-5249-1 Available from www.lulu.com as ID#12303084 or
Amazon.fr: ISBN 978-1-4710-5249-1
[4] March 10_2010 LeukemiaCloseup 2D copy http://novobiotronics.com/CancerResults8.html
[5] March 3_2010 PancreaticClose1E copy2 http://novobiotronics.com/CancerResults11.html
also: http://novobiotronics.com/CancerResults7.html
[6] Ovarian 081210_9D copy2 http://novobiotronics.com/CancerResults9.html
[7] of the dielectric properties of body tissues at RF and
1996
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5
9
[8]
number 24, 9 Dec.2002
[9] Relation of the optimal TTField frequency to cell size. Link:
http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2007/05/30/0702916104.DC1#A1
[10] Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J Alternating electric fields
ar Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 2007, 104(24):10152-10157.
Proceedings - 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF - October 2012 (Malta) ISBN: 978-99957-0-361-5

whodathunkit wrote:Hey Fred and Nashville, my father died within two months from the powerful experiemental chemotherapy drug that his fully licensed and well-respected oncologist dosed him with.

Do you think it would be a good thing if I took that doctor to court for giving my father advice that killed him? If not, why not?

Why the FUCK not? Huh?

I wish to HELL I'd had more than a passing acquaintance with Rife and the information we have on this board before he passed.

Fred, I'm sorry for what happened to you with your iodine experience, but you need STFU and quit trolling this thread. Quit trolling the forum in general. If you can't contribute positively, take your disgruntlement elsewhere. AND STAY THE HELL AWAY FROM TAKING THE SIDE OF ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE WHEN IT COMES TO CANCER. YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT.

*Note: one guy's unverifiable discussion board anecdote about a really bad experience with iodine does not mean it's bad for everyone.

FredtheBelgian wrote: I'm the voice of reason on this forum

FredtheBelgian wrote:
3. "Abstinence from masturbation makes your voice deeper"

The purpose of this study is to gain understanding of the relationship between ejaculation and serum testosterone level in men. The serum testosterone concentrations of 28 volunteers were investigated daily during abstinence periods after ejaculation for two phases. The authors found that the fluctuations of testosterone levels from the 2nd to 5th day of abstinence were minimal. On the 7th day of abstinence, however, a clear peak of serum testosterone appeared, reaching 145.7% of the baseline ( P < 0.01). No regular fluctuation was observed following continuous abstinence after the peak. Ejaculation is the precondition and beginning of the special periodic serum testosterone level variations, which would not occur without ejaculation. The results showed that ejaculation-caused variations were characterized by a peak on the 7th day of abstinence; and that the effective time of an ejaculation is 7 days minimum. These data are the first to document the phenomenon of the periodic change in serum testosterone level; the correlation between ejaculation and periodic change in the serum testosterone level, and the pattern and characteristics of the periodic change.

You say 'experimental chemotherapy drug' which suggests it hadn't reached the stage of full approval.

whodathunkit wrote:

All childish taunting aside, why is it that both you and Fred refuse to answer the question of why it's okay to sue a manufacturer of a Rife device when someone dies of cancer when using it, but it's NOT okay to sue doctors or pharmaceutical companies over the thousands and thousands of premature cancer deaths caused allopathically every year by chemo drugs? The answer is your answser would be oxymoronic and hypocritical, and what's more, you know it.

RisingFist wrote: Better to stop posting in here altogether. It's not worth arguing with ignorance.

Nashville Hairline wrote:

RisingFist wrote: Better to stop posting in here altogether. It's not worth arguing with ignorance.

No way. I wish there was more sceptical voices on this forum when I spent $$$ on the IH supps.

FredtheBelgian wrote:

Nashville Hairline wrote:

RisingFist wrote: Better to stop posting in here altogether. It's not worth arguing with ignorance.

No way. I wish there was more sceptical voices on this forum when I spent $$$ on the IH supps.

Same for me, nearly 700€. If it did anything, I have not not noticed it.