The Hidden Wikipedia: How to Find Deleted Material about Nutritional Medicine

misterE wrote:

NrwgnKID wrote: do you know if there is done any studies on differences in eating habits among animals within the same specie in nature ?

Monkeys; are closest relative, feed on mostly fruits and vegetables, and in the winter months they eat nuts and seeds. I've never seen a pack of monkeys chasing down a animal and eating it. Have you?

As you can see, we are hunter/gatherers by default. The paleo diet makes perfect sense. The pain is only in the resistance.

Polluted wrote:As you can see, we are hunter/gatherers by default. The paleo diet makes perfect sense. The pain is only in the resistance.

I object.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/health/views/20essa.html?_r=2

http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/21/paleofantasies-of-the-perfect-diet-marlene-zuk-in-nytimes/

http://blogs.plos.org/neuroanthropology/2010/10/28/food-for-thought-cooking-in-human-evolution/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+plos%2Fblogs%2Fneuroanthropology+%28Blogs+-+Neuroanthropology%29

So MisterE your saying milk is bad no matter if its raw or pastuerized?

empty wrote:

Polluted wrote:As you can see, we are hunter/gatherers by default. The paleo diet makes perfect sense. The pain is only in the resistance.

I object.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/health/views/20essa.html?_r=2

http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/21/paleofantasies-of-the-perfect-diet-marlene-zuk-in-nytimes/

http://blogs.plos.org/neuroanthropology/2010/10/28/food-for-thought-cooking-in-human-evolution/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+plos%2Fblogs%2Fneuroanthropology+%28Blogs+-+Neuroanthropology%29

Lots of material out there tailored to suit the agenda of the meat haters.

This says it all... theres really is no debate here.

GreenPower wrote:So MisterE your saying milk is bad no matter if its raw or pastuerized?

Yes.

Polluted wrote:

empty wrote:

Polluted wrote:As you can see, we are hunter/gatherers by default. The paleo diet makes perfect sense. The pain is only in the resistance.

I object.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/health/views/20essa.html?_r=2

http://neuroanthropology.net/2009/01/21/paleofantasies-of-the-perfect-diet-marlene-zuk-in-nytimes/

http://blogs.plos.org/neuroanthropology/2010/10/28/food-for-thought-cooking-in-human-evolution/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+plos%2Fblogs%2Fneuroanthropology+%28Blogs+-+Neuroanthropology%29

Lots of material out there tailored to suit the agenda of the meat haters.

This says it all... theres really is no debate here.

No, those aren't meat haters. They just question the logic upon which those diets are based. Ultimately, the people who designed those diets don't know crap about the archaelogical record. They just made up this archetypal human hunter/gatherer to support their arguments. You clearly did not read the articles. These are the people who actually have an understanding of the record.

I'm not against these "diets," and nor are the anthropologists that wrote those articles. I actually prefer eating that way. I just think it's silly when people say "this is how we are supposed to eat because this is how we ate back in the day!" That's nonsense. While it's obvious we shouldn't eat certain foods (such as super processed goods), it's neither obvious nor simple what we ate in our early years.