Dog bites and rabies virus

I was recently bit by a dog. The doctor told me there was no need for a rabies vaccine as there hasnt been a case of it in the last 20 years in the city or 10 years in the county. Just curious if anyone has thoughts on this. I have been following the virus talk and curious how rabies comes into play. Thanks

bh1546 wrote:I was recently bit by a dog. The doctor told me there was no need for a rabies vaccine as there hasnt been a case of it in the last 20 years in the city or 10 years in the county. Just curious if anyone has thoughts on this. I have been following the virus talk and curious how rabies comes into play. Thanks

Personally, I've read a lot on rabies and am convinced it doesn't even exist.

More on Rabies here: https://viroliegy.com/2022/02/25/louis-pasteurs-unethical-rabies-fraud/

Here's some background from the book, Virus Mania (updated version)

"At this point, we encourage our readers to verify dominant virus theories
independently—as many people have done, among them Nobel laureates,
top microbiologists and researchers from other fields, serious journalists
and lay people alike. We’ve asked for evidence from important institutions
like World Health Organization (WHO), the American Centers for Disease
Control (CDC), or its German counterpart, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI)"

in Berlin. In the summer of 2005, for example, we contacted the RKI and
requested the following information:

1. Please name the studies that indisputably show that the SARS,
hepatitis C, Ebola, smallpox and polio viruses and the BSE causative
agent have been proven to exist (complete purification, isolation and
definition of biochemical properties plus electron micrographs).

2. Please name studies that indisputably show that the viruses named
above cause disease (and also that other factors like malnutrition,
toxins, etc. do not at least co-determine the course of disease).

3. Please name at least two studies that indisputably show that
vaccinations are effective and active.
Unfortunately, to date we have not (despite repeated questioning) yet had a
single study named to us.

Readers may wonder how it can be continually claimed that this or that
virus exists and has potential to trigger diseases through contagion. An
important aspect in this context is that some time ago, mainstream virus
science left the road of direct observation of nature, and decided instead to
go with so-called indirect “proof” with procedures such as antibody and
PCR tests.

In this book, we will often stray from the well-traveled road, but at this
point we must point out that these methods lead to results which have little
to no meaning. Antibody tests just prove the existence of antibodies—and
not the virus or particle itself to which the antibody tests react. That means:
as long as the virus or cell particle (antigen) has not been precisely defined
no one can say what these antibody tests are reacting to; they are thus
“unspecific” in medical lingo.

It is no different with PCR (polymerase chain reaction), which is used to
track down genetic sequences, little genetic snippets, and then replicate
them a million-fold. As with antibody tests, PCR probably has significance
because it displays a sort of immune reaction (as it is called in technical
terms) in the body; or, to put it more neutrally, some sort of disturbance or
activity on a cellular level. But a virus with indeterminate characteristics
cannot be proven by PCR any more than it can be determined by a little
antibody test.

Again, this is because the exact virus determination has not
been carried out. Even Robert Gallo conceded this in court in 2007.209
In terms of genetics, these short DNA or RNA pieces that are found using
the PCR do not even satisfy the definition of a gene (of which humans are
said to have 20,000 to 25,000).

But even if scientists assume that the
genetic sequences discovered in the laboratory belong to the viruses
mentioned, this is a long way from proving that the viruses are the causes of
the diseases in question, particularly when the patients or animals who have
been tested are not even sick, which, often enough is the case.

Another important question must be raised: even when a supposed virus
does kill cells in the test-tube (in vitro), or lets embryos in a chicken egg
culture die, can we safely conclude that these findings can be carried over to
a living organism (in vivo)? Many issues contradict this theory, such as that
the particles termed viruses stem from cell cultures (in vitro) whose
particles could be genetically degenerate because they have been
bombarded with chemical additives like growth factors or strongly
oxidizing substances A 2017 study shows this using antibiotics.

In 1995, the German news magazine Der Spiegel delved into this problem
(something that is worth noting, when one considers that this news
magazine usually runs only orthodox virus coverage), quoting researcher
Martin Markowitz from the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New
York: “The scientist [Markovitz] mauls his virus-infected cell cultures with
these poisons in all conceivable combinations to test which of them kill the
virus off most effectively. ‘Of course, we don’t know how far these cross
checks in a test-tube will bring us,’ says Markowitz. ‘What ultimately
counts is the patient.’ His clinical experience has taught him the difference
between test-tube and sick bed. He is more aware than most AIDS
researchers of how little the behavior of cultured virus stems in incubator
cells has to do with those that grow naturally in a network of hormones,
antibodies, scavenger and T cells of the immune system of a living
person.”

The chemist Andreas Meyerhans, when he was still working at the Institut
Pasteur in Paris, uses the phrase: “To culture is to disturb,” which basically
means that the results obtained in vitro only confuse.

“Unfortunately, the decade is characterized by climbing death rates, caused
by lung cancer, heart disease, traffic accidents and the indirect
consequences of alcoholism and drug addiction,“ wrote Sir Frank
Macfarlane Burnet, recipient of the Nobel Prize for Medicine, in his 1971
book Genes Dreams, and Realities: “The real challenge of the present day
is to find remedies for these diseases of civilization. But nothing that comes
out of the labs seems to be significant in this context; laboratory research’s
contribution has practically come to an end. For someone who is well on
the way to a career as a lab researcher in infectious disease and
immunology, these are not comforting words.”

To biomedical scientists and the readers of their papers, Burnet continued, it
may be exciting to hold forth on “the detail of a chemical structure from a
phage’s [viruses from simple organisms; see below] RNA, or the production
of antibody tests, which are typical of today’s biological research. But
modern fundamental research in medicine hardly has a direct significance to
the prevention of disease or the improvement of medical precautions.”

But mainstream medicine avoids this theory like the devil does holy water.
Instead, one tries to demonstrate the pathogenicity (ability to cause disease)
of these particles through experiments that could hardly be more arcane.

For instance, test substrates were injected directly into the brains of lab
animals. This was the procedure with BSE and polio, for example; and even
the famous Louis Pasteur had applied this method in his rabies experiments,
in which he injected diseased brain tissue into the heads of dogs (Pasteur
became famous through these experiments, and only years after his death
were these studies found to be pure put-on).

The industry now says that “direct injections into the brain” are unrealistic, and thus ultimately
provide no evidence of pathogenic effects.

Why not suppose that a virus, or what we term a virus, is a symptom—i.e. a
result—of a disease? Medical teaching is entrenched in Pasteur and Koch’s
picture of the enemy, and has neglected to pursue the thought that the
body’s cells could produce a virus on its own accord, for instance as a
reaction to stress factors. The experts discovered this a long time ago, and
speak of “endogenous viruses”—particles that form inside the body by the
cells themselves.

"And what about Pasteur’s purportedly highly successful experiments with a
rabies vaccine in 1885? Only much later did the research community learn
that they did not satisfy scientific standards at all, and were thus unfit to
back up the chorus of praise for his vaccine-mixture. Pasteur’s super
vaccine “might have caused rather than prevented rabies,” writes scientific
historian Horace Judson."

bh1546 wrote:I was recently bit by a dog. The doctor told me there was no need for a rabies vaccine as there hasnt been a case of it in the last 20 years in the city or 10 years in the county. Just curious if anyone has thoughts on this. I have been following the virus talk and curious how rabies comes into play. Thanks

Can you observe the animal for some time ? Because if nothing happens to the animal within a week then you are good.
I had rabies vaxx on 3 different occasions in my life and looking back, I don't think any of those were warranted. Two of those times I was too young(6 and 9) and it was my parents decision. I got one in 2014 and that was my decision and it was a bad decision. It was a scratch and I surely didn't need it. I just got paranoid because I used to be very scared of diseases, especially rabies for some reason.

2 weeks ago a young cat scratched and bit my hand(me and someone else were t rying to rescue it) and I said fuck it. Didn't get the rabies vaxx.

Nuada wrote:

bh1546 wrote:I was recently bit by a dog. The doctor told me there was no need for a rabies vaccine as there hasnt been a case of it in the last 20 years in the city or 10 years in the county. Just curious if anyone has thoughts on this. I have been following the virus talk and curious how rabies comes into play. Thanks

Can you observe the animal for some time ? Because if nothing happens to the animal within a week then you are good.
I had rabies vaxx on 3 different occasions in my life and looking back, I don't think any of those were warranted. Two of those times I was too young(6 and 9) and it was my parents decision. I got one in 2014 and that was my decision and it was a bad decision. It was a scratch and I surely didn't need it. I just got paranoid because I used to be very scared of diseases, especially rabies for some reason.

2 weeks ago a young cat scratched and bit my hand(me and someone else were t rying to rescue it) and I said fuck it. Didn't get the rabies vaxx.

Cat scratch fever - Cats are known to carry a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) in their feces, and if we accidentally come into contact with this parasite, it can cause an unpleasant condition known as toxoplasmosis."

Treatable with high-dose Vitamin C and/or oxidation therapies.

Mainstream uses disinformation and fear, keeping people scared and ignorant so they can rely on a profession that kills.

It's now more 'normal' to be sick than it is to be healthy. This is the food, the air, and water and the Quackcines at work.

Young people, indoctrinated by government schools all teaching mostly half-truths, to be invested into falsehoods.

So the past few weeks have been a bit of something. At the clinic I got the wound cleaned they basically forced me into taking the TDap booster which i kind of regret. Three to 4 days later I come down with flu like symptoms and left wondering..is this a vaccine reaction/some type of virus/bacteria from bite or even worse rabies cause i never got the shot.

The only the i got was fever and body aches which i am still dealing with. I have something nerve related in my legs where i got really stiff and if i stand too long its either muscle spasms or nerves pressure from inflammation i dunno. I feel better than yesterday but still concerned as i have never had this. Cs should I got get a vitamin c drip?

I drove by friday and the dog looks perfectly heathy. So theres hope in that.

bh1546 wrote:So the past few weeks have been a bit of something. At the clinic I got the wound cleaned they basically forced me into taking the TDap booster which i kind of regret. Three to 4 days later I come down with flu like symptoms and left wondering..is this a vaccine reaction/some type of virus/bacteria from bite or even worse rabies cause i never got the shot.

The only the i got was fever and body aches which i am still dealing with. I have something nerve related in my legs where i got really stiff and if i stand too long its either muscle spasms or nerves pressure from inflammation i dunno. I feel better than yesterday but still concerned as i have never had this. Cs should I got get a vitamin c drip?

I drove by friday and the dog looks perfectly heathy. So theres hope in that.

This \/@ccine is toxic, here are the ingredients:

https://vaccines.procon.org/vaccine-ingredients-and-manufacturer-information/#dtap

Heavy metal chelation and Vitamin C-Drip wouldn't be a bad idea.

CausticSymmetry wrote:

Nuada wrote:

bh1546 wrote:I was recently bit by a dog. The doctor told me there was no need for a rabies vaccine as there hasnt been a case of it in the last 20 years in the city or 10 years in the county. Just curious if anyone has thoughts on this. I have been following the virus talk and curious how rabies comes into play. Thanks

Can you observe the animal for some time ? Because if nothing happens to the animal within a week then you are good.
I had rabies vaxx on 3 different occasions in my life and looking back, I don't think any of those were warranted. Two of those times I was too young(6 and 9) and it was my parents decision. I got one in 2014 and that was my decision and it was a bad decision. It was a scratch and I surely didn't need it. I just got paranoid because I used to be very scared of diseases, especially rabies for some reason.

2 weeks ago a young cat scratched and bit my hand(me and someone else were t rying to rescue it) and I said fuck it. Didn't get the rabies vaxx.

Cat scratch fever - Cats are known to carry a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) in their feces, and if we accidentally come into contact with this parasite, it can cause an unpleasant condition known as toxoplasmosis."

Treatable with high-dose Vitamin C and/or oxidation therapies.

Mainstream uses disinformation and fear, keeping people scared and ignorant so they can rely on a profession that kills.

It's now more 'normal' to be sick than it is to be healthy. This is the food, the air, and water and the Quackcines at work.

Young people, indoctrinated by government schools all teaching mostly half-truths, to be invested into falsehoods.

Yeah I've heard about toxoplasmosis. I washed my wound with soap and alcohol applied some antiseptic tincture.